New version of starforce...


Recommended Posts

Not sure if this has already been posted, but here it is anyway...

This latest identified threat by Futuremark is one that relates to a driver being installed on your computer that gains RING0 access (the highest level of access to your computer). The installation requires Administrator level access to install the driver, which runs all of the time regardless of whether or not you're playing a game with Starforce DRM.

With such a high level of processor access (sharing the same levels the operating system enjoys), the Starforce driver can do anything to your computer at any time. This very ability is demonstrated, since the Starforce driver will force a reboot (not a shutdown) when it thinks it has discovered suspicious activity related to copying. The reboot occurs instantly, and any and all unsaved data could be lost.

In addition, Starforce removes the DPM readings (Data Protection Manager) which must be present on many other non-Starforce protected games, setting the stage for a chain of system events, which basically make it impossible to make even a usable backup copy of your favorite game. Starforce can also block access to some other drivers, requiring certain hardware devices to run in PIO mode (Programmed Input/Output), which results in a lot of overhead for the CPU and a slowing down of your system.

Source/Link:

http://www.techamok.com/?pid=297

Update:

Its been confirmed by futuremark that they have not carried out any investigations into starforce themselves, it appears that the information came from members of futuremarks forums.

More info here:

http://www.futuremark.com/news/?newsarticl...0603/2006032104

Edited by ReAnimation
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/444707-new-version-of-starforce/
Share on other sites

Nothing but pure Virus/Trojan

StarForce give us a break and go find another field of practice, cause you guys have no clue about computers.

I concur 100%

the makers of this crap should be disallowed to ever touch a computer again. I understand the problem of piracy but when that protection itself transcends into other areas of computing, causing instantaneous reboots, data loss, slowdowns, etc, it should be considered completely illegal. Its pathetic that they can do all this just to protect something.

If I was working on a big PHP project like i have been lately and it rebooted me and I lost all of my code (yes, I save often but you can't save constantly), i'm sure they'd be getting plenty of heat and possibly a personal visit from myself. I hate companies like this that focus on making someones computer a ticking timebomb :angry:

How the hell is this legal?

So what if it makes a mistake while you burn a dvd with files named like the games or something and it just reboots your PC and you lose a lot of important work? Would they compensate you?

It also blocks other drivers, doesn't Microsoft not like this sort of behaviour written into drivers? I'm sure I read a page about having to follow certain rules when writing drivers.

It'll just be cracked. Simple.

saying that, only need some idiot to find an exploit and make a virus and causes havok.

So true, a starforce patch aka ultimate virus :/

Starforce just needs to go away. if they only gave me ring0 acces to their stuff :shiftyninja:

i would delete everything

yeah, it will be cracked by the people who want to pirate games, and know how to.

For average Joe, who just wants to save his homework on a disc, something screwy will happen and his computer will reboot. So, he'll think he has a virus, and take the computer to the BestBuy geek squad who will charge him like $150 to fix it.

It is really getting out of hand. I dont believe that Piracy hurts game sales. The people who Pirate the game, were not going to buy it anyway. The same with music.

Millions of people probably downloaded stupid songs like "The Dukes of Hazard Theme Song". I feel confident that none of them were going to buy it. Ever

Starforce is very intrusive. I hope that Microsoft treats this the same as they did with Sony's rootkit thing

Someone is going to lose some of there computer data over some starforce mistake/hiccup, and sue the games company which has implemented starforce on there game, the games company will lose the suit and starforce will be avoided by every games company from then on.

Now we just have to wait for these chain of events to unfold. I hope its EA who get burned.

If they could 100% guarantee that it would not affect everyday use, then I wouldn't have an issue, as I dont pirate games.

But, one thing I have done (and love) is create a virtual drive that has battlefield 2 loaded on it. This allows me to play the game, with the disc. I have the disc, and a CD-Key. The game is mine, and I still have the receipt. I should be allowed to run the game however I want. I have many games, and on any given night, we coud play between 10 different games. I hate searching for discs.

I have trackmania, so I assume that Starforce is installed. This did not, however, affect my battlefield 2 game. But, i suspect that if I installed Starforce before making the game image, then it may not have worked.

So, I have issues with that.

I just took a swing around there forums and wow... lol there are literally hundreds of users all complaining of the same issues with StarForce.

Main problems from what I can see.

Non-working drives while/after using StarForce

Burning programs failing to burn any more

BSODS when trying to do the above ^

Devices reverting to PIO causing failed CD/DVD burns.

Games not working and telling people to use different [compatible] optical drives.

I am glad none of my games include this evasive copy protection.

I just took a swing around there forums and wow... lol there are literally hundreds of users all complaining of the same issues with StarForce.

Main problems from what I can see.

Non-working drives while/after using StarForce

Burning programs failing to burn any more

BSODS when trying to do the above ^

Devices reverting to PIO causing failed CD/DVD burns.

Games not working and telling people to use different [compatible] optical drives.

I am glad none of my games include this evasive copy protection.

Except for Trackmania Nations (IF) you have that.

It sounds terrible for the fact they are letting this Malware pour out onto your system to damage other hardware devices and BSODS. disgusting behaviour.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!