FCC Chieft agrees to limit access to Google or pay


Recommended Posts

FCC Chief Kevin Martin yesterday gave his support to AT&T and other telcos who want to be able to limit bandwidth to sites like Google, unless those sites pay extortion fees. Martin made it clear in a speech yesterday that he supports such a a "tiered" Internet.

- source

got this info all from digg.com

Title is abit misleading I know but it's to gets people attention. anyways...

No, it's not an attack on the bill of rights. You can always say what you want(within reason) but you never had the right to do it on someone elses dime. The internet is the first beast of it's kind so it's hard to compare it to something but I guess it'd be akin to paying a flat fee on a printing press then taking up a huge majority of it making them have to build more machines to serve their other customers.

Obviousely, the ones actually delivering the bandwidth deserve and need to make money, they have to keep laying more and more and it'll never stop, we'll always be needing more bandwidth.

But I still don't like the idea of them charging extra fees to the websites, it'd throw everything upside down. I don't know though, I'd have to find out more about their current profits and income and all that before I decide on this. Maybe we're getting off to well as the consumer with our unlimited usage packages, or maybe web sites are getting off to cheaply, or maybe the companies involved already make enough money in this segment and just want more. I don't know. But the idea of them being able to charge for their usage is not wrong.

The customer pays a monthly cost that is to cover network maintenance and the bandwidth that they use.

When a customer connects to a Google server, it is purely opt-in, Google doesn't force anyone to use AT&Ts bandwidth to access Google servers. If Google were using AT&T lines to sent unsolicited data that is using network resources, fair enough, but they are not. Google shouldn't pay them, and AT&T customers that were unsatisfied with the speed when they access their most used websites (Google) will soon leave because they are not getting the speed that they paid for.

The customer pays a monthly cost that is to cover network maintenance and the bandwidth that they use.

When a customer connects to a Google server, it is purely opt-in, Google doesn't force anyone to use AT&Ts bandwidth to access Google servers. If Google were using AT&T lines to sent unsolicited data that is using network resources, fair enough, but they are not. Google shouldn't pay them, and AT&T customers that were unsatisfied with the speed when they access their most used websites (Google) will soon leave because they are not getting the speed that they paid for.

I agree, this sounds like a bad idea to me. (N)

Sounds like a very bad idea. It will stop small sites from rising up, as stated in the article.

Apart from that, we are paying the ISPs to give us access to the internet. Not their selection of preferred sites and services. Please forgive me if this last bit doesn't sound relevant, as I may be misunderstanding it a bit.

I dont see there being any upside to a "tiered" internet for customers. Is there something I'm overlooking or is this just another way to make more money and destroy small businesses in the process?

It's basically an easy way for them to charge more for the same service your currently getting, they limit your speed for certain sites and protocol's, then force you to pay more (and the sites) if you want to use the full extent of your bandwidth for those things (e.g. limiting BitTorrent to 1/3rd of your total bandwidth, then charging you so they allow full speed)

Im not really worried about this because I dont think it will come to fruition. Nobody is for this except for the phone companies, and that moron whose in charge of the FCC. If they really do try and go through with this id imagine theyll be held up in legal battles for along time.

how will this work. Say google uses a verizon internet line like verizon fiber. How will at&t block google?

Wouldn't at&t have to make a deal with verizon to block googles traffic? Wouldn't verizon who serves google be screwing their customer (google)

ps this was just an example.

Does this mean I can ask my ISP for a discount if they block any AT&T related sites? Or ad's that are hosted on their servers? Wouldn't this help out with my own ISP's bandwidth issues? With this, the little guy could help out the bigger guy!

On second thought, I might be willing to play a one time small fee for just this...

This is just plain stupid. I mean google and others are already paying for bandwidth, why should they have to pay for it again. It's just a money grabbing scheme, and I can't believe the FCC agreed.

Another question though, I'm guessing this only apply's to services in the US, so a European company can't be charged??

I don't see why they should be charging search engines myself, but since when does the FCC rule correctly dealing with the internet? Regardless of the commissioner, they make rules and laws that are outright ridiculous and make no sense. I guess that's what lobbying does in the long run :whistle:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • VS Code 1.123 introduces massive upgrades for persistent AI developer workflows by Paul Hill Microsoft has just released Visual Studio Code 1.123 alongside its annual developer conference, Build 2026. This release, as always, has a heavy focus on advanced AI agent integration and making the built-in browser more robust. Notably, this update brings big sync changes that keep your AI agents persistent across sessions. With this update, VS Code now supports cross-machine syncing for chat histories, touched files, repository contexts, and related PRs via GitHub accounts, tying users even more into Microsoft’s developer ecosystem. This update also introduces the new /chronicle command that allows you to query past sessions using natural language, generate instant standup reports, and get personal productivity insights. Microsoft has also made some improvements to network-dependent operations, it explains: “When a terminal command that is run by a local agent requires access to domains that are not configured as allowed domains, the command is automatically retried inside the sandbox with unrestricted network access. After that, if it still fails, it falls back to unsandboxed execution. This allows network-dependent operations such as git fetch to finish, while keeping filesystem protections in place.” Microsoft has not stopped there; in this update, it also allows developers to drag, drop, and pin multiple agent sessions side-by-side for easy code comparisons in real-time. It also introduces the Research Agent, accessible via /research. This is a read-only, depth-optimized tool that gets data from the web, local codebase, and GitHub to give you a Markdown report on complex APIs or unfamiliar code. Now, let’s talk about the integrated browser and some security enhancements. VS Code 1.123 features enhanced screenshot capture tools that allow for targeted Area Screenshots and Full Page Screenshots to send layout context instantly to AI chat. The address bar has also been revamped, supporting favorite pages and tab management. Finally, on the security front, this update introduces a safety-first two-hour delay on third-party extension auto-updates to safeguard against compromised or buggy releases. This release is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux. If you have VS Code, keep an eye out for the update availability notification. If you still don’t have VS Code, you can get it here.
    • I'm hoping with the Surface Pro 12, I can use either USB-C for my Xreal One Pro glasses. With my Surface Pro 11 OLED X Elite, I have to plug them into the top port. The bottom port will power it, but nothing shows on the screen. Maybe it's my setting. When I plug in the glasses, I have it output only to the glasses. So maybe I need to turn on both displays with it in the top port, then switch the glasses to the bottom port and set it to output only to the glasses. And then hopefully Windows remembers the settings for either the top port and bottom port (one of the awesome features of Windows where it remembers the exact configuration when plugging in external monitors.
    • Forgive my ignorance, but the only difference I see here is that a USB-A is now a USB-C, so there are two of them. For the modern age (and I'd argue since 2020), most products would now come with USB-C as an option, if not the default. Display, charging, devices, etc on TWO connectors, sometimes all combined! So having 2 of those powerful ports is great for something this size! Meanwhile my Surface Pro (5) has a single USB-A port which I cannot even get display out to, instead relying on some Surface Connect dock which I don't have. That is a poor experience, not to mention expensive and not compatible with other devices. Thank God USB-C is mainstream!
    • wow. that color finally comes to Surface Pro. was always a little jelly when a friend had the sandstone Surface Laptop. I wonder how different this dune is from the sandstone. I'll be getting the dune version. always thought black and platinum were a little boring. I'll still have access to my blue Surface Pro 11 as it'll be a hand-me-down.
    • Looks a very subjective aren't they!? I like its simple design. I love the way Apple designs their products with function over form, minimalization, and simplicity over cluttered complex designs. Many, not all, of their products follow this trend, and the device becomes a tool rather than dominating the space. I do not however like their OS. I have never bought a Apple product, and while I'd consider the Neo for my wife, I am hoping there are better alternatives out there when her failing MacBook Pro 2017 finally stops. Fischer-Price is famously plastic, garish, and poorly made. Basically you're describing the Window Laptops the Neo competes against! This is how product design should be, and what Apple have often followed in recent years: https://tenprinciples.design/
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      482
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      227
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      Nick H.
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!