The Grand National

By saxondale.
in The Sporting Arena

 Share

Recommended Posts

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Anthropic trained its models on copyrighted books, US judge says it's fair use

      By JayZJay · Posted

      You make some good points, but some of your comments are nonsense such as 'deporting "illegal immigrants" from a land that was stolen to begin with'. How many countries and territories in the world are the result of one power being conquered by another and the power being conquered either surrendering their territory or having it outright taken? This has gone on since the beginning of this world. Systematic injustice is far too common in many countries around the world (sadly), not just in the U.S. [Side note: It is particularly hypocritical in the U.S. where the government and politicians talk about what the flag stands for, "Land of the free and home of the brave", and so on.]
    • Anthropic trained its models on copyrighted books, US judge says it's fair use

      By Astra.Xtreme · Posted

      Isn't AI a human creation though? AI isn't sentient and under it's own control. It's doing things that are purposely programmed and directed by humans.
    • Anthropic trained its models on copyrighted books, US judge says it's fair use

      By PWazzle · Posted

      I think Stack overflow bringing a case against them might not go the same way. Context windows currently inherently prevent an AI from replacing a book, but they can replace stuff like Stack Overflow, Reddit, and other Forums.
    • Anthropic trained its models on copyrighted books, US judge says it's fair use

      By PWazzle · Posted

      First of all, copyright infringement is not theft, or stealing, it's copyright infringement. You are not inherently deprived of anything when someone makes a copy of something or reads a piece of copyrighted material which means that it is not theft. That was true when Hollywood was locking people in prison for downloading cars and it's true now. Secondly, it's in the article, because the judge ruled that it's transformative. That's a core part of how copyright law works. Google can't exist without scraping the copyrighted information of millions of webpages and turning that into a search index. Just reading and processing copyrighted material is not copyright infringement if you don't republish the work or a replacement for it. The case of whether or not AI models are a replacement for the work they're scraping I don't think is as cut and try as this single case is. AI models are not particularly good replacements for books at the moment, but they are a good replacement for things like Stack overflow. I suspect they might have a stronger argument for AI training on them being infringing.
    • Nvidia announces RTX 5050 desktop graphics card for more affordable next-gen gaming

      By johnnyq3 · Posted

      Give us a 5010 Nvidia, 6 GB of GDDR6 RAM at 64bt, we need a 710 replacement. /s

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      DrRonSr earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Sharon dixon earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Parallax Abstraction earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      956400 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidfegan earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      619
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      228
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      169
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      167
    5. 5
      Som
      146
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!