Microsoft Announces IE7+ for Vista


Recommended Posts

In order to differentiate between Internet Explorer 7 on Windows XP and Vista, Microsoft on Friday announced "IE7+." The special branding is designed to highlight the additional features IE7 will receive in Vista, including Protected Mode, parental controls, and improved network diagnostics.

"There are no feature differences between IE7 and IE7+ beta 2 other than the ones I mentioned above; we have, however, fixed a bunch of bugs between the two releases," explained IE team member Tony Schreiner. "As always, I?d love to hear your feedback on this naming as well as the product. We?ll have more information on how to sign up for Windows Vista beta 2 with IE7+ shortly."

Link


Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/464661-microsoft-announces-ie7-for-vista/
Share on other sites

This may seem like a stupid question, and a bit off topic, but are Microsoft building IE7+ into Vista in the same way they built IE6 into Windows XP? Will IE7+ be able to be deleted without causing any problems?

IE7 will nolonger be intergraded into the operating system.

Do you mean that IE7 for XP is not integrated into the OS? Or just IE7 for Vista?

IE is stuck for the most part on the XP systems. Vista apparently allows the removal of this.

What I don't get is why they'd want to even call it IE7+. Might as well call it ****+. :yes:

--edit

So what, I can't say **** now? Goddamnit.. Well, it has to do with feces. :rofl:

What I don't get is why they'd want to even call it IE7+. Might as well call it ****+. :yes:

--edit

So what, I can't say **** now? Goddamnit.. Well, it has to do with feces. :rofl:

And what's wrong with it? I'm in the IE7 XP beta and, let me tell you, I'm very impressed with it. Or maybe you're just trolling cause it's IE and it's cool to hate IE.

IE is stuck for the most part on the XP systems. Vista apparently allows the removal of this.

What I don't get is why they'd want to even call it IE7+. Might as well call it ****+. :yes:

--edit

So what, I can't say **** now? Goddamnit.. Well, it has to do with feces. :rofl:

Yay! Cool little 16 year olds following the cool trend!

No one is looking forward to? Riiiiight.

Actually, nobody outside of "fans" of MSFT is excited about it. Ask your average Sys Admin and they will give you a "meh" and probably tell you that they will probably wait until they have no choice to deploy it. After the problems they had with XP SP2 deployment breaking older software including software from MSFT, they cannot see anything radically new to get excited about.

Vista is turning out to be a paid service pack for XP when compared with what MSFT hyped and promised at PDC 2003.

I remember a colleague of mine asked if I was running a mac theme when I logged into my machine at head office which had an XP MSStyle port of a Vista theme running on it. She had not been following the development of Vista and mistook the glass look for a copy of Aqua.

:laugh:

I think that should give you guys pause to think about what MSFT is really delivering and whether they are copying Apple once again. If a die hard windows user/developer that has not been following Vista development mistakes the Glass look for Aqua, what do you think the average consumer will think?

I remember a colleague of mine asked if I was running a mac theme when I logged into my machine at head office which had an XP MSStyle port of a Vista theme running on it. She had not been following the development of Vista and mistook the glass look for a copy of Aqua.

:laugh:

I think that should give you guys pause to think about what MSFT is really delivering and whether they are copying Apple once again. If a die hard windows user/developer that has not been following Vista development mistakes the Glass look for Aqua, what do you think the average consumer will think?

Uhh, I think there are deeper rooted issues at work there rather than Vista looking like OS X. In some sick literal sense, mistaking Vista for any OS X version is like mistaking black for white.

Anyone who mistakes a black glass theme for the white aqua theme is a little short handed in certain areas.

Vista is gaining ground and is going to be a big step in the right direction for security for the home user. The fact that IE7+ alone will run in a protected mode giving room between it and the rest of the system is a god send. UAC, while a bit misguided in it's current implementation, will also be a blessing in disguise once people get out of the habit of clicking "yes" to everything.

To say this is nothing but a service pack is short handed as the list of improvements go on and on. Hell, the fact that the amount of reboots needed, even for system updates, will be cut down drastically, will make many people, including sys admins very happy.

Actually, nobody outside of "fans" of MSFT is excited about it. Ask your average Sys Admin and they will give you a "meh" and probably tell you that they will probably wait until they have no choice to deploy it. After the problems they had with XP SP2 deployment breaking older software including software from MSFT, they cannot see anything radically new to get excited about.

Vista is turning out to be a paid service pack for XP when compared with what MSFT hyped and promised at PDC 2003.

I remember a colleague of mine asked if I was running a mac theme when I logged into my machine at head office which had an XP MSStyle port of a Vista theme running on it. She had not been following the development of Vista and mistook the glass look for a copy of Aqua.

:laugh:

I think that should give you guys pause to think about what MSFT is really delivering and whether they are copying Apple once again. If a die hard windows user/developer that has not been following Vista development mistakes the Glass look for Aqua, what do you think the average consumer will think?

I don't think the average consumer will give a damn.

I don't know what's everyone complaining about. If you don't like IE7+ then don't use it. It's not like you get a jail sentence from Microsoft if you don't use it or get a goodie bag for every positive comment. Why everyone wants to waste their breath about this I have no idea. And don't say because it's cool because I'll kick you all the way to Timbuktu for that comment.

Suffice to say, IE7 on XP has been very good for me especially QuickTabs and the Anti-Phising Filter. With IE7+ running in protected mode as bangbang023 has said, it will run in a much more secure environment, limiting the amount of damage of a certain attack if a user does something wrong. So enough with the IE7+ performing below expectations or that it's just a useless feature. Just be happy with whatever browser you're using as you're not getting paid for every bad comment about IE7+.

PSG22

Edited by PSG22

Anyone who mistakes a black glass theme for the white aqua theme is a little short handed in certain areas.

Vista is gaining ground and is going to be a big step in the right direction for security for the home user. The fact that IE7+ alone will run in a protected mode giving room between it and the rest of the system is a god send. UAC, while a bit misguided in it's current implementation, will also be a blessing in disguise once people get out of the habit of clicking "yes" to everything.

To say this is nothing but a service pack is short handed as the list of improvements go on and on. Hell, the fact that the amount of reboots needed, even for system updates, will be cut down drastically, will make many people, including sys admins very happy.

I don't think the average consumer will give a damn.

I dont think you can convince the average consumer to either 1) upgrade to vista, 2) buy a computer capable of vista or 3) believe that Vista is more secure than XP...most dont even care or know about computer security.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? The engine has all the tools a dev needs to optimize their game, Epic isn't gonna hold their hand to make sure they use them. Also, Epic isn't forcing anyone to use Lumen, Nanite or super high resolution meshes and textures. Just because Nanite can render meshes with millions of polygons doesn't mean you should use it like that, in fact, Epic recommends you avoid doing that. Most of the stuttering can easily be fixed by cutting down on unique shaders by using master materials and generating a PSO cache and compiling every shader before loading the game and also managing what must be loaded and unloaded at runtime, it's up to the developer to set all that up properly.
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!