Macs: Where Everything Costs Money.


Recommended Posts

I'm still bordering between the windows and apple realms for my next laptop. I've been going through some excellent apple applications, but I've noticed that practically every noticeable app on the mac costs money. Where are my expertly designed freebies? Where are the superb open source programs? On the PC, I have numerous free alternatives. Heck, when did P2P software start to cost money? On windows, I'd immediately assume that to be a scam. Going through the "Essential OSX Apps" thread, I realized that there isn't a single Free FTP Application. So I have to purchase just to use a more powerful FTP program?! Not so in windows. Even notepad-esque apps cost money on Mac!

So I ask, where can I find a list of excellent, free [if any] software programs for the Mac.

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/465696-macs-where-everything-costs-money/
Share on other sites

Well here is a great free ftp program for Mac: http://cyberduck.ch - I personally bought Transmit and love it but Cyberduck is good and I know people who is it. I wouldn't rely on the "Essential OSX Apps" topic here, since it is not updated that much if I recall and plus there is so much software out there to even be able to constantly list/update. I personally do not mind having to purchase software for my mac but also I have found a lot of freeware programs for mac, so that leads me to think you are really not searching for free alternatives to software you want on the mac. You could also make a topic/ask someone for an alternative to such and such program if you are having a hard time finding one, if exists.

Here's a good site you can go to, to find free mac applications: http://www.versiontracker.com/macosx/ just click on the Updates by Category and look through different programs in there. Make sure to look under Freeware license programs as that site does list Shareware and such program licenses as well.

Edited by mistical

Well obviously [then again, not really], I was invoking those as examples. It still remains that most good programs on mac cost money. It's hard to beat something like this.

I can do just about everything (except for programs that fix Windows problems of course) in that list with either free Applications, Applications Apple includes for free or with functionality built right into Mac OS X. List some things from that list you want to be able to do in OS X.

Oh, I'm sure it can. I'm not bashing functionality. I'm debasing variety.

I do have one question though: How would you organize pictures from two different cameras? For example in windows I just create two different folders, one for each camera, and then upload pictures into their respective folder. How would I go about doing this on the mac? Wouldn't iPhoto pop up automatically syncing both cameras? I want to keep each camera's photos separate.

There are great free apps for almost any task. If you search for an app at VersionTracker or MacUpdate, they will tell you whether it's free or not right on the search results screen.

But, you are right, there are some very talented people out there that make amazing software and they deserve to get paid for it. Some of us just like to pay a premium to get a premium product.

Squibbles, there is more software available for the Windows platform than the Mac. But at the same time, you can do pretty much anything on a Mac once you find the software, and there is almost always a freeware alternative. You just won't find the same amount of options as on Windows but usually what is there is very good quality.

Also, soon you will start seeing that applications will be cross platform without much effort, when Universal builds run on Windows automatically and vice versa. The two platforms are much more compatible now, there is only going to be more and more software coming up I think

Thanks for all the replies.

It's greatly helping in my decision.

Anyways, I still have this question: I do have one question though: How would you organize pictures from two different cameras? For example in windows I just create two different folders, one for each camera, and then upload pictures into their respective folder. How would I go about doing this on the mac? Wouldn't iPhoto pop up automatically syncing both cameras? I want to keep each camera's photos separate.

Thanks for all the replies.

It's greatly helping in my decision.

Anyways, I still have this question: I do have one question though: How would you organize pictures from two different cameras? For example in windows I just create two different folders, one for each camera, and then upload pictures into their respective folder. How would I go about doing this on the mac? Wouldn't iPhoto pop up automatically syncing both cameras? I want to keep each camera's photos separate.

Just Create Two Seperate Smart Albums in your Source Screen in iPhoto. A list should appear that houses all the previously connected models. From there, after created the denoted albums, you not only have one big library, but two folders that'll not only organize them by roll, but by which camera they came from.

File > New Smart Album > Sort by Camera Model

Just Like This

Edited by varekai2

Just Create Two Seperate Smart Albums in your Source Screen in iPhoto. A list should appear that houses all the previously connected models. From there, after created the denoted albums, you not only have one big library, but two folders that'll not only organize them by roll, but by which camera they came from.

File > New Smart Album > Sort by Camera Model

Just Like This

And then is it possible to burn only one camera's pictures onto a CD?

Thanks for all the replies.

It's greatly helping in my decision.

Anyways, I still have this question: I do have one question though: How would you organize pictures from two different cameras? For example in windows I just create two different folders, one for each camera, and then upload pictures into their respective folder. How would I go about doing this on the mac? Wouldn't iPhoto pop up automatically syncing both cameras? I want to keep each camera's photos separate.

I would actually just recommend using the Image Capture application (comes with OS X) and selecting the photos you want to download off of the given camera and then telling it where to place them. No iPhoto involved at all.

And then is it possible to burn only one camera's pictures onto a CD?

Yes you can.

If you want to do iPhoto, that is the best method, and it's pretty slick.

But if you don't want to use iPhoto at all and just organize your pictures into folders as you did on Windows, then ImageCapture will work great for you. It's actually a really nice app.

As for your original question as well, if you just mention here in the thread what tasks you are specifically looking to do, we can all suggest good free alternatives.

I got my mac in January 05, when I first started looking for things I was shocked, everything I had to pay for. So, like you I started looking for free alternatives ... I used cyberduck ... and used Transmit. I bought Transmit, nothing compares to it. Though, Cyberduck is nice. I tried a bunch of RSS readers, and ended up buying NewsFire, nothing else worked quite like it did. I think I've spent more money on anything computer related since I got my mac, and I feel good about it. Maybe we will keep getting these quality apps if people continue to support the devs.

AFAIK CAD software only tends to be available for more well known UNIX type systems such as Solaris / SGI IRIX or Windows NT/2000 - certainly in my limited experience with Pro/ENGINEER that was the case! Windows or UNIX only!

And then is it possible to burn only one camera's pictures onto a CD?

Another Way I find easier:

Within iPhoto -

First select your smart folder with the pictures that relate to your camera of choice.

From there, you can go to the Share tab on the Menu Bar and select "Burn".

This will burn to your media of choice.

I think you'd be pleasantly surprised by the number of high-quality free and/or open-source apps available for Mac.

As mentioned, VersionTracker and MacUpdate are incredibly handy websites for Mac users that will reveal many apps available for OS X.

Most of the apps on my system, aside from Apple?made/bundeled ones, are free and/or open-source.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!