Macs: Where Everything Costs Money.


Recommended Posts

I'm still bordering between the windows and apple realms for my next laptop. I've been going through some excellent apple applications, but I've noticed that practically every noticeable app on the mac costs money. Where are my expertly designed freebies? Where are the superb open source programs? On the PC, I have numerous free alternatives. Heck, when did P2P software start to cost money? On windows, I'd immediately assume that to be a scam. Going through the "Essential OSX Apps" thread, I realized that there isn't a single Free FTP Application. So I have to purchase just to use a more powerful FTP program?! Not so in windows. Even notepad-esque apps cost money on Mac!

So I ask, where can I find a list of excellent, free [if any] software programs for the Mac.

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/465696-macs-where-everything-costs-money/
Share on other sites

Well here is a great free ftp program for Mac: http://cyberduck.ch - I personally bought Transmit and love it but Cyberduck is good and I know people who is it. I wouldn't rely on the "Essential OSX Apps" topic here, since it is not updated that much if I recall and plus there is so much software out there to even be able to constantly list/update. I personally do not mind having to purchase software for my mac but also I have found a lot of freeware programs for mac, so that leads me to think you are really not searching for free alternatives to software you want on the mac. You could also make a topic/ask someone for an alternative to such and such program if you are having a hard time finding one, if exists.

Here's a good site you can go to, to find free mac applications: http://www.versiontracker.com/macosx/ just click on the Updates by Category and look through different programs in there. Make sure to look under Freeware license programs as that site does list Shareware and such program licenses as well.

Edited by mistical

Well obviously [then again, not really], I was invoking those as examples. It still remains that most good programs on mac cost money. It's hard to beat something like this.

I can do just about everything (except for programs that fix Windows problems of course) in that list with either free Applications, Applications Apple includes for free or with functionality built right into Mac OS X. List some things from that list you want to be able to do in OS X.

Oh, I'm sure it can. I'm not bashing functionality. I'm debasing variety.

I do have one question though: How would you organize pictures from two different cameras? For example in windows I just create two different folders, one for each camera, and then upload pictures into their respective folder. How would I go about doing this on the mac? Wouldn't iPhoto pop up automatically syncing both cameras? I want to keep each camera's photos separate.

There are great free apps for almost any task. If you search for an app at VersionTracker or MacUpdate, they will tell you whether it's free or not right on the search results screen.

But, you are right, there are some very talented people out there that make amazing software and they deserve to get paid for it. Some of us just like to pay a premium to get a premium product.

Squibbles, there is more software available for the Windows platform than the Mac. But at the same time, you can do pretty much anything on a Mac once you find the software, and there is almost always a freeware alternative. You just won't find the same amount of options as on Windows but usually what is there is very good quality.

Also, soon you will start seeing that applications will be cross platform without much effort, when Universal builds run on Windows automatically and vice versa. The two platforms are much more compatible now, there is only going to be more and more software coming up I think

Thanks for all the replies.

It's greatly helping in my decision.

Anyways, I still have this question: I do have one question though: How would you organize pictures from two different cameras? For example in windows I just create two different folders, one for each camera, and then upload pictures into their respective folder. How would I go about doing this on the mac? Wouldn't iPhoto pop up automatically syncing both cameras? I want to keep each camera's photos separate.

Thanks for all the replies.

It's greatly helping in my decision.

Anyways, I still have this question: I do have one question though: How would you organize pictures from two different cameras? For example in windows I just create two different folders, one for each camera, and then upload pictures into their respective folder. How would I go about doing this on the mac? Wouldn't iPhoto pop up automatically syncing both cameras? I want to keep each camera's photos separate.

Just Create Two Seperate Smart Albums in your Source Screen in iPhoto. A list should appear that houses all the previously connected models. From there, after created the denoted albums, you not only have one big library, but two folders that'll not only organize them by roll, but by which camera they came from.

File > New Smart Album > Sort by Camera Model

Just Like This

Edited by varekai2

Just Create Two Seperate Smart Albums in your Source Screen in iPhoto. A list should appear that houses all the previously connected models. From there, after created the denoted albums, you not only have one big library, but two folders that'll not only organize them by roll, but by which camera they came from.

File > New Smart Album > Sort by Camera Model

Just Like This

And then is it possible to burn only one camera's pictures onto a CD?

Thanks for all the replies.

It's greatly helping in my decision.

Anyways, I still have this question: I do have one question though: How would you organize pictures from two different cameras? For example in windows I just create two different folders, one for each camera, and then upload pictures into their respective folder. How would I go about doing this on the mac? Wouldn't iPhoto pop up automatically syncing both cameras? I want to keep each camera's photos separate.

I would actually just recommend using the Image Capture application (comes with OS X) and selecting the photos you want to download off of the given camera and then telling it where to place them. No iPhoto involved at all.

And then is it possible to burn only one camera's pictures onto a CD?

Yes you can.

If you want to do iPhoto, that is the best method, and it's pretty slick.

But if you don't want to use iPhoto at all and just organize your pictures into folders as you did on Windows, then ImageCapture will work great for you. It's actually a really nice app.

As for your original question as well, if you just mention here in the thread what tasks you are specifically looking to do, we can all suggest good free alternatives.

I got my mac in January 05, when I first started looking for things I was shocked, everything I had to pay for. So, like you I started looking for free alternatives ... I used cyberduck ... and used Transmit. I bought Transmit, nothing compares to it. Though, Cyberduck is nice. I tried a bunch of RSS readers, and ended up buying NewsFire, nothing else worked quite like it did. I think I've spent more money on anything computer related since I got my mac, and I feel good about it. Maybe we will keep getting these quality apps if people continue to support the devs.

AFAIK CAD software only tends to be available for more well known UNIX type systems such as Solaris / SGI IRIX or Windows NT/2000 - certainly in my limited experience with Pro/ENGINEER that was the case! Windows or UNIX only!

And then is it possible to burn only one camera's pictures onto a CD?

Another Way I find easier:

Within iPhoto -

First select your smart folder with the pictures that relate to your camera of choice.

From there, you can go to the Share tab on the Menu Bar and select "Burn".

This will burn to your media of choice.

I think you'd be pleasantly surprised by the number of high-quality free and/or open-source apps available for Mac.

As mentioned, VersionTracker and MacUpdate are incredibly handy websites for Mac users that will reveal many apps available for OS X.

Most of the apps on my system, aside from Apple?made/bundeled ones, are free and/or open-source.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!