Macs: Where Everything Costs Money.


Recommended Posts

Is there a free alternative to Candybar? If I get a mac, I'd want to customize the icons.

Maybe, it is becuase you don't own a Mac right now. When you buy one, there won't be any applications problem. I am sure you can find almost free Mac apps online. As you mention P2P before!!! :D

I was wondering. Why do Engineering firms never use Mac?

edit: totally misread 'engineering' for 'enterprise'. Ignore.

(sod it, below are my enterprise related comments anyway)

---

Many reasons.

1) Cost. It takes a LOT to justify that extra expense

2) Support. Apple just don't seem to care about anything that isn't a home user or a school.

3) Enterprise level integration. Among many other problems Active Directory support is limited from a security angle.

4) In house applications. Most large corps don't want to have to re-write and re-test thousands of in house apps

5) User training. Argue it all you like, the simple fact is it will cost a lot of money.

Above all though, Apple's marketting department haven't targetted enterprise customers yet. I'm sure they could pull some childish, unsubstantiated, 'based on nothing but out dated rumours and myths' style adverts to argue against Novell, Microsoft etc when their product simply isn't up to the job.

Is there a free alternative to Candybar? If I get a mac, I'd want to customize the icons.

on a Mac you don't even need any extra software to put icons on. get any .png image you want (or any other format but .png with transparency is the best) use spotlight and type in Icon Composer it will come to the top of the list, open it and simply open the files you want to turn into icons.

then save the converted images (they will become .ico) go to the applications which icons you want to change ctrl + Click (Right click) and select "Show Package Contents" then find the applications .ico and replace it with the one you have created.

Candybar is an easier and faster way to do all this ^ But it's not required.

then save the converted images (they will become .ico) go to the applications which icons you want to change ctrl + Click (Right click) and select "Show Package Contents" then find the applications .ico and replace it with the one you have created.

Candybar is an easier and faster way to do all this ^ But it's not required.

There's even an easier solution to change a single icon. Select the icon in the finder, Apple+i and it brings the Info of the file, then Apple+c on the icon on the top. After that Apple+i on the application/folder/document you want to change the icon, and Apple+v on the icon on the top.

If you want to restore the original icon simple get info again, select the icon and press backspace. :)

There's even an easier solution to change a single icon. Select the icon in the finder, Apple+i and it brings the Info of the file, then Apple+c on the icon on the top. After that Apple+i on the application/folder/document you want to change the icon, and Apple+v on the icon on the top.

If you want to restore the original icon simple get info again, select the icon and press backspace. :)

That won't really do the trick when changing system icons. Unless you feel like changing every single folder manually. But it's perfect for changing individual files/folders of course.

The only thing I really objected to is being expected to pay ?20 to allow Quicktime to save files and go full screen. I know you can use VLC instead, but Quicktime is the default video player, it's OS X's equivilent of Windows Media Player, and it can't even play files full screen or save files without paying extra!

So far I've only felt a need to buy Quicktime Pro (despite the indignation, I do rather like it), and Panic's Unison newsreader... I haven't needed anything else that wasn't free!

Ps, after a little configuration, Adium is a superb IM Client!:DD

The only thing I really objected to is being expected to pay ?20 to allow Quicktime to save files and go full screen.

...

tell application "QuickTime Player"
	present front movie scale screen
end tell

Type that into script editor, save it somewhere (if you have the Script Menu enabled save it in ~/Library/Scripts/Applications/QuickTime Player), when it's run it makes the front most QuickTime window go full screen.:yes::

And saving from the QuickTime prospective is handled by the libraries (hence the reason iTunes can encode to AAC or MP3), but the QuickTime Player doesn't have the options (and it's encoding, not saving)

I am amazed people believe that MacOSX software costs money, i can tell you now that my ibook is the first time ive had a machine completly legit and i use it everyday,

i use openoffice for my office programs, i dont really care about changing themes and all that so i dont have to pay for that also i believe in windows you did as well.

i believe in windows you did as well.

No, it was free.

As for Mac, the problem lies in the fact that unlike free (as in beer) systems such as Linux you have a very limited selection of programs for tasks like playing various music formats. iTunes is absolutely horrendous and other equivalents are equally downright awful.

The only saving grace at the moment is that in the future, hopefully, more gracious people will port applications from Linux and other operating systems and put them up for free.

No, it was free.

As for Mac, the problem lies in the fact that unlike free (as in beer) systems such as Linux you have a very limited selection of programs for tasks like playing various music formats. iTunes is absolutely horrendous and other equivalents are equally downright awful.

I have to agree with you, there isn't that many good iTunes alternatives. I personally love iTunes and invested in 2xAirport Expresses and a few iPods just for iTunes.

I'm still bordering between the windows and apple realms for my next laptop. I've been going through some excellent apple applications, but I've noticed that practically every noticeable app on the mac costs money. Where are my expertly designed freebies? Where are the superb open source programs? On the PC, I have numerous free alternatives. Heck, when did P2P software start to cost money? On windows, I'd immediately assume that to be a scam. Going through the "Essential OSX Apps" thread, I realized that there isn't a single Free FTP Application. So I have to purchase just to use a more powerful FTP program?! Not so in windows. Even notepad-esque apps cost money on Mac!

So I ask, where can I find a list of excellent, free [if any] software programs for the Mac.

Thanks.

Guess its a good thing you can dual boot then isnt it! :p :laugh: :rofl:

This thread is more about the bigger picture of free software on Macs, but since it started with FTP clients, I've got to mention by favorite free FTP client for the Mac.

Fugu: http://rsug.itd.umich.edu/software/fugu

Fugu uses a two pane layout and has a Favorites feature which is good if you need to upload to multiple servers.

Hand on squibbles so your saying that windows doesnt cost more money for the better software umm lets see, microsoft office still costs money, the ftp clients still cost money? of course in 90% of the time the better software will cost more

Hand on squibbles so your saying that windows doesnt cost more money for the better software umm lets see, microsoft office still costs money, the ftp clients still cost money? of course in 90% of the time the better software will cost more

Yeah exactly. The situation isn't that different on Windows.

Windows XP Pro is ?240 (Amazon) while OS X is ?89.99 with the money saved from just upgrading the Mac you could buy some cool app:):)

You can get Windows XP OEM for 129€ here (89?) and as for buying OEM software, if you buy as much as a screw for your computer, you're eligible for OEM software.

typically more $$ means better/higher quality.. but that's not how i see it with macs, both hardware and software.

hardware-wise, macs have always been outrageously expensive, and with no good reason. are they pretty? absolutely. are they fast/efficient? absolutely NOT!. some may pose that the new craptel based macs changed that.. but it's still the exact same.. just now they moved to a slightly faster, dumbed up 32-bit processor, and to make that even worse.. it's an intel.

so.. you get to pay for prettiness/"bragging rights" (i wouldn't say bragging rights personally, more like a reason to say, "YAY! i paid 4x what i should have for a very pretty case!!"

software-wise, macs have fewer programs because smart people see through the propaganda and realize that it's not worth it to pay such a high premium for a degradation in performance over a regular PC, therefore there are less who will write for apple computers.. and then, going hand-in-hand with the hardware being much less efficient and a lot slower per $1, the programs that do get written are slower than their PC counterparts.

so to recap: The hardware aesthetics: beautiful.. the OS interface: beautiful.. the hardware performance: absolutely abysmal.. pricepoint: in no way justifiable for anyone who has even a small portion of a brain.. OS speed compared to Linux/Windows: horrible..

so, if you're looking for an e-penis among the other macboys, get a mac..

and when you do get that mac.. remember what you get:

-what some would call bragging rights

-crappy performance

-select range of software offerings

-much higher pricetag

-made fun of by those who have a even a hint of intelligence in knowing that something that is slower, -crappier, and has less options should NEVER cost nigh 3x as much as it should

-ignorance in thinking that somehow and someway you're justified in overspend for a piece of crap and simultaneously considering yourself above those unfortunate and deprived PC users

but everyone has their opinions, and everyone is entitled to act appropriately as per that opinion, but sometimes the best way to think of it is:

ignorance is (apple's)bliss

so, if you're looking for an e-penis among the other macboys, get a mac..

and when you do get that mac.. remember what you get:

-what some would call bragging rights

-crappy performance

-select range of software offerings

-much higher pricetag

-made fun of by those who have a even a hint of intelligence in knowing that something that is slower, -crappier, and has less options should NEVER cost nigh 3x as much as it should

-ignorance in thinking that somehow and someway you're justified in overspend for a piece of crap and simultaneously considering yourself above those unfortunate and deprived PC users

but everyone has their opinions, and everyone is entitled to act appropriately as per that opinion, but sometimes the best way to think of it is:

ignorance is (apple's)bliss

..... What planet are you from? I own 2 Macs several high performance Windows powered PC's. I guess I don't fit in any of your categories huh? ... I don't quite understand how any of your opinions hold water. "Crappy Performance" "Bragging Rights" "Made fun of by PC users".. These are all points you just slapped together. I hate to say it but that is one of the most hateful troll posts I've ever seen in the Mac forums. Congratulations.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!