Recommended Posts

I had a thread a few weeks ago about this. This time when I went out to the track I used full manual mode. I have a few questions, with motor sport, I am supposed to use the fastest shutter speed possible, but when I shot using anything faster than 1/1600 came out too dark. Also I was using f/5.6 for pretty much the whole day, because if I went for a higher number, it came out too dark.

Now at the moment I don?t understand too much about the aperture thing, but if the opening is smaller, shouldn?t that area still have light, where the outside of the photo is dark? Or does it not work like that?

Here are two photos from the weekend.

Photo 1

Photo 2

One more thing, what would be the advantages of shooting in RAW?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/466321-motorsport-photography/
Share on other sites

A smaller aperture will give you a bigger zone of sharpness (depth of field) while a larger aperture will make the zone of sharpness more shallow.

f/2.8 (large aperture) will give you a moderate and f/22 (tiny aperture) will give you a huge zone of sharpness.

Try different shutter speeds, 1/1600 is hella fast and I think you might want to try speeds like 1/250. Otherwise you might want to try cranking up the ISO.

About RAW, someone else might have to answer that one.

for fast moving sports, you want to have the fastest shutter speed, with the lowest DOF (usually) which means the smallest/fastest aperature (lower number). you don't want to go higher than f/5.6.

check out these shots:

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/405338

mostly shot at 1/800 at f/2.8.

With sports it depends on what results you want. Needing a fast shutterspeed is not correct in all cases. For moving bodies that are not static, for instance a runner or a cyclist, where the arms and legs are moving independent from the body or the object is moving up and down opposed to the surface its on , it is good to use a fast shutter so you can freeze the moment.

With car races for instance, where the whole body of the car is moving in the same direction, a slower shutterspeed adds alot to the shot. For instance, if you shoot a f1 car on a straight from the side with a very high shutter it would be as if the car is just standing still. If you lower the shutter, follow the car with the lens when he passes, then you'll get a nice feeling of speed. The background will be flying by while the car is nice and sharp. This does take some practice though! But since you're shooting digital practising is free.

I have a nice shot of a renault F1 car passing at 275 km/h and i used a shutter of 1/125th. My aperture was up at about 8 compensating for the light on a bright day. Aperture in this situation doesn't matter because the only thing sharp in the picture will be the object you were following with your lens.

With motocross you tend to use the biggest aperture (lower number) available and a higher shutter like the 2.8 aperture and 1/800th, because you want to freeze the bike and capture all the sand spraying up. I do have some nice shots at home (i'm in the office now) with a slow shutter but that is mostly on a flat straight so the bikes aren't jumping up and down when you follow them.

Good luck!

These are MUCH better than the your previous shots!

As Sjokkel mentioned, you should look up panning once you're comfortable with capturing the bikes at a high shutter speed. Getting a sharp shot while panning will take some practise, but once you master it, it'll give you some amazing shots.

Working in RAW lets you tweak the WB, Curves, Exposure etc. when you load the RAW file onto your computer. If you shoot in continuous mode (which you should), I recommend sticking with JPEG, because RAW files will fill up your buffer very quickly.

Motorcycle racing I use 1/100th or 1/500th and that is plenty fast and 400 or 800 ISO, and F/3.5 (or F/7 with 2x converter). But I use film and there is a lot more room for error. But try 1/1000th that is fast enough to freeze action. Anything slower then 1/250 you need to be good at panning. Also if you can, don't see into the sun, shoot in the general direction your shadow is pointing.

Nice supermotard pics (Y)

About time someone on here did photography like I did, lol. Motocross/supercross is my passion- The best lenses for high-speed/high-action (at least in my experience) are f/2.6 lenses and definitely at least 1/500 shutter speed. Here are some examples of my stuff:

Image #1 - Chad Reed

Image #2 - Amateur MX

Image #3 - Amateur MX #2

-Ian

Thanks guys. I didn't know how slow the shutter speed could get before it was 'too' slow.

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/405338

From this gallery, what's the best way about getting photos to turn out like that? With bright, clear colours and the background completely blurred/out of focus.

Thanks guys. I didn't know how slow the shutter speed could get before it was 'too' slow.

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/405338

From this gallery, what's the best way about getting photos to turn out like that? With bright, clear colours and the background completely blurred/out of focus.

An expensive, long telephot lens with a huge apature (F/1.8, 2.8, 4)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!