Recommended Posts

I have collected some Windows 95/98/ME Alphas/Betas Screenshots and put in into the album called Windows 95/98/ME Alphas/Betas Screenshots Centre. Of course, Most of the screenshots were capped by me and some screenshots searched from internet.

Chicago: http://chicago.win95.googlepages.com/index.htm

Memphis: http://memphis.win98.googlepages.com/index.htm

Georgia: http://georgia.winme.googlepages.com/index.htm

3 sites had been browsed more than 2000 times (H)

Chicago Screenshots:

Preliminary Release Version:

Chicago Build 38

Chicago Build 40

Chicago Build 56

Chicago Build 58s

Chicago Build 73

Chicago Build 73g

Chicago Build 78

Chicago Build 81

Chicago Build 99

Beta Version:

Chicago Build 122 Beta 1

Chicago Build 189 Beta 1.4

Chicago Build 222 German Spanish Italian French Dutch Swedish

Chicago Build 224 Beta 2

Chicago Build 225 Chinese

Chicago Build 324 German

Chicago Build 347 English Spanish German Beta 3

Chicago Build 435 Chinese

Chicago Build 440

Chicago Build 450 Danish Finnish Norwegian

Chicago Build 456

Chicago Build 462 English Dutch Spanish French German Italian Swedish

Chicago Build 468

Release Candidate:

Chicago Build 480 English German

Chicago Build 481

Chicago Build 484

Chicago Build 490 English Portugese Spanish French German Italian

Chicago Build 499 German

Chicago Build 501

Chicago Build 502

Chicago Build 708 Chinese

Chicago Build 720 Chinese Japanese Korean

Chicago Build 852

Chicago Build 950r-2 Interim

Nashville Screenshots:

Nashville Build 999

Nashville Build 1265

Memphis Screenshots:

Alpha/Developer Release Version:

Memphis Build 1351

Memphis Build 1387

Memphis Build 1423

Beta Version:

Memphis Build 1400 Beta 1

Memphis Build 1488

Memphis Build 1511

Memphis Build 1525

Memphis Build 1532

Memphis Build 1546 Beta 2

Memphis Build 1569

Memphis Build 1577

Memphis Build 1588 Chinese Beta 3

Memphis Build 1593

Memphis Build 1602 Beta 2.1

Memphis Build 1619

Memphis Build 1629 Beta 3

Memphis Build 1650

Memphis Build 1658

Memphis Build 1681

Release Candidate Version:

Memphis Build 1691 RC0

Memphis Build 1723 RC2

Memphis Build 1900 RC4

OEM Service Release Beta Version:

98OSR Build 2106 OSR1

98OSR Build 2120

98OSR Build 2150.4 OSR2

98OSR Build 2150A

Windows 98 Second Edition Release Candidate Version:

98SE Build 2183A

98SE Build 2185A RC2

Famous Hacked Version of Windows 98:

Windows 98 Third Edition Chinese

Windows 99

Georgia/Millennium Screenshots:

Alpha Version:

Georgia/Millennium Build 2332.2

Georgia/Millennium Build 2348

Georgia/Millennium Build 2350.3

Georgia/Millennium Build 2358

Georgia/Millennium Build 2368

Beta Version:

Georgia/Millennium Build 2380.2

Georgia/Millennium Build 2394

Georgia/Millennium Build 2419

Georgia/Millennium Build 2452

Georgia/Millennium Build 2460

Georgia/Millennium Build 2470

Georgia/Millennium Build 2476

Georgia/Millennium Build 2481

Georgia/Millennium Build 2491

Georgia/Millennium Build 2499.3

Georgia/Millennium Build 2499.7 English Japanese German Korean

Release Candidate Version:

Georgia/Millennium Build 2509

Georgia/Millennium Build 2513

Georgia/Millennium Build 2516

Georgia/Millennium Build 2525.6

Other screenshots:

Windows 3.1 for workgroups codename Sparta Build 14e

Windows 3.1 codename Janus Build 61d

Windows 2000 Powered

Enjoy!! :lol:

Edited by Gillian

Ah, it does bring back some fond memories :cry: (and not so fond ones, I remember the media player in Windows 95 can sometimes crash and bring a BSOD when trying to play a media file :pinch: ).

PSG22™

Ah, it does bring back some fond memories :cry: (and not so fond ones, I remember the media player in Windows 95 can sometimes crash and bring a BSOD when trying to play a media file :pinch: ).

PSG22?

Haha! It is successful to use Windows Media Player 7.1 in Windows Chicago!

wmp71.gif

Well I'll be a monkey's uncle... I thought that MS had been tweaking and slowly improving this dialog from Windows 95 all the way to Server 2003, when they had it nearly perfect for Chicago Beta 1.

network.gif

If they had continued with that, and replaced those side buttons with an "Add..." and "Properties" button for each of the four sections, along with a similarly clear "Bindings" tab, it would've been done. I'll see how Vista is when it's done downloading, but I have every confidence that the networking setup won't be as intuitive as this could've been (unless you're fine with just install it + DHCP).

Well I'll be a monkey's uncle... I thought that MS had been tweaking and slowly improving this dialog from Windows 95 all the way to Server 2003, when they had it nearly perfect for Chicago Beta 1.

network.gif

If they had continued with that, and replaced those side buttons with an "Add..." and "Properties" button for each of the four sections, along with a similarly clear "Bindings" tab, it would've been done. I'll see how Vista is when it's done downloading, but I have every confidence that the networking setup won't be as intuitive as this could've been (unless you're fine with just install it + DHCP).

However, Chicago Beta 1 is not stable to test :whistle:

  • 4 weeks later...

Nice thats funky useful aswell :) strange enough Windows ME when was finally seems still act's a Beta :p lol if anyone has had ME would know what im on about lol. Blue screens of Death and kernal errors and the constant lag and the annoying Errors poping up all over the place :D seems like one big death trap lmao

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Too soon, I'm still not over this death!
    • Normally, I admit when a title is clickbait (unfortunately, it's become somewhat necessary in AI-dominated news sections today), but in this case, all supported versions is implied and doesn't need to be spelled out in the title. Of course, I'm covering a Patch Tuesday update but that is only available to supported Windows SKUs. All our coverage relates to supported Windows software and SKUs only unless we expressly state that it's "unsupported", "unofficial", or "third-party". I'm sorry, but supported/official SKUs don't need to be spelled out as such in every Neowin headline.
    • ALL versions or ALL SUPPORTED versions? Neowin does it again.
    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      586
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!