Recommended Posts

I have collected some Windows 95/98/ME Alphas/Betas Screenshots and put in into the album called Windows 95/98/ME Alphas/Betas Screenshots Centre. Of course, Most of the screenshots were capped by me and some screenshots searched from internet.

Chicago: http://chicago.win95.googlepages.com/index.htm

Memphis: http://memphis.win98.googlepages.com/index.htm

Georgia: http://georgia.winme.googlepages.com/index.htm

3 sites had been browsed more than 2000 times (H)

Chicago Screenshots:

Preliminary Release Version:

Chicago Build 38

Chicago Build 40

Chicago Build 56

Chicago Build 58s

Chicago Build 73

Chicago Build 73g

Chicago Build 78

Chicago Build 81

Chicago Build 99

Beta Version:

Chicago Build 122 Beta 1

Chicago Build 189 Beta 1.4

Chicago Build 222 German Spanish Italian French Dutch Swedish

Chicago Build 224 Beta 2

Chicago Build 225 Chinese

Chicago Build 324 German

Chicago Build 347 English Spanish German Beta 3

Chicago Build 435 Chinese

Chicago Build 440

Chicago Build 450 Danish Finnish Norwegian

Chicago Build 456

Chicago Build 462 English Dutch Spanish French German Italian Swedish

Chicago Build 468

Release Candidate:

Chicago Build 480 English German

Chicago Build 481

Chicago Build 484

Chicago Build 490 English Portugese Spanish French German Italian

Chicago Build 499 German

Chicago Build 501

Chicago Build 502

Chicago Build 708 Chinese

Chicago Build 720 Chinese Japanese Korean

Chicago Build 852

Chicago Build 950r-2 Interim

Nashville Screenshots:

Nashville Build 999

Nashville Build 1265

Memphis Screenshots:

Alpha/Developer Release Version:

Memphis Build 1351

Memphis Build 1387

Memphis Build 1423

Beta Version:

Memphis Build 1400 Beta 1

Memphis Build 1488

Memphis Build 1511

Memphis Build 1525

Memphis Build 1532

Memphis Build 1546 Beta 2

Memphis Build 1569

Memphis Build 1577

Memphis Build 1588 Chinese Beta 3

Memphis Build 1593

Memphis Build 1602 Beta 2.1

Memphis Build 1619

Memphis Build 1629 Beta 3

Memphis Build 1650

Memphis Build 1658

Memphis Build 1681

Release Candidate Version:

Memphis Build 1691 RC0

Memphis Build 1723 RC2

Memphis Build 1900 RC4

OEM Service Release Beta Version:

98OSR Build 2106 OSR1

98OSR Build 2120

98OSR Build 2150.4 OSR2

98OSR Build 2150A

Windows 98 Second Edition Release Candidate Version:

98SE Build 2183A

98SE Build 2185A RC2

Famous Hacked Version of Windows 98:

Windows 98 Third Edition Chinese

Windows 99

Georgia/Millennium Screenshots:

Alpha Version:

Georgia/Millennium Build 2332.2

Georgia/Millennium Build 2348

Georgia/Millennium Build 2350.3

Georgia/Millennium Build 2358

Georgia/Millennium Build 2368

Beta Version:

Georgia/Millennium Build 2380.2

Georgia/Millennium Build 2394

Georgia/Millennium Build 2419

Georgia/Millennium Build 2452

Georgia/Millennium Build 2460

Georgia/Millennium Build 2470

Georgia/Millennium Build 2476

Georgia/Millennium Build 2481

Georgia/Millennium Build 2491

Georgia/Millennium Build 2499.3

Georgia/Millennium Build 2499.7 English Japanese German Korean

Release Candidate Version:

Georgia/Millennium Build 2509

Georgia/Millennium Build 2513

Georgia/Millennium Build 2516

Georgia/Millennium Build 2525.6

Other screenshots:

Windows 3.1 for workgroups codename Sparta Build 14e

Windows 3.1 codename Janus Build 61d

Windows 2000 Powered

Enjoy!! :lol:

Edited by Gillian

Ah, it does bring back some fond memories :cry: (and not so fond ones, I remember the media player in Windows 95 can sometimes crash and bring a BSOD when trying to play a media file :pinch: ).

PSG22™

Ah, it does bring back some fond memories :cry: (and not so fond ones, I remember the media player in Windows 95 can sometimes crash and bring a BSOD when trying to play a media file :pinch: ).

PSG22?

Haha! It is successful to use Windows Media Player 7.1 in Windows Chicago!

wmp71.gif

Well I'll be a monkey's uncle... I thought that MS had been tweaking and slowly improving this dialog from Windows 95 all the way to Server 2003, when they had it nearly perfect for Chicago Beta 1.

network.gif

If they had continued with that, and replaced those side buttons with an "Add..." and "Properties" button for each of the four sections, along with a similarly clear "Bindings" tab, it would've been done. I'll see how Vista is when it's done downloading, but I have every confidence that the networking setup won't be as intuitive as this could've been (unless you're fine with just install it + DHCP).

Well I'll be a monkey's uncle... I thought that MS had been tweaking and slowly improving this dialog from Windows 95 all the way to Server 2003, when they had it nearly perfect for Chicago Beta 1.

network.gif

If they had continued with that, and replaced those side buttons with an "Add..." and "Properties" button for each of the four sections, along with a similarly clear "Bindings" tab, it would've been done. I'll see how Vista is when it's done downloading, but I have every confidence that the networking setup won't be as intuitive as this could've been (unless you're fine with just install it + DHCP).

However, Chicago Beta 1 is not stable to test :whistle:

  • 4 weeks later...

Nice thats funky useful aswell :) strange enough Windows ME when was finally seems still act's a Beta :p lol if anyone has had ME would know what im on about lol. Blue screens of Death and kernal errors and the constant lag and the annoying Errors poping up all over the place :D seems like one big death trap lmao

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are they marketed as an entry into astronomy or astrophotography? I do astrophotography. With big rigs, lots of computers, cables and headaches. I love it. And by learning this ridiculously complex hobby, I’ve learned about the objects I’m shooting. Astronomy followed from photography.
    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
    • They said by this time everyone will have flying cars. WELL...
    • A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. Maybe not as we now know that time can flow backwards.
    • Of course. Simply reverse the polarity.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      577
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      183
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!