Recommended Posts

I have collected some Windows 95/98/ME Alphas/Betas Screenshots and put in into the album called Windows 95/98/ME Alphas/Betas Screenshots Centre. Of course, Most of the screenshots were capped by me and some screenshots searched from internet.

Chicago: http://chicago.win95.googlepages.com/index.htm

Memphis: http://memphis.win98.googlepages.com/index.htm

Georgia: http://georgia.winme.googlepages.com/index.htm

3 sites had been browsed more than 2000 times (H)

Chicago Screenshots:

Preliminary Release Version:

Chicago Build 38

Chicago Build 40

Chicago Build 56

Chicago Build 58s

Chicago Build 73

Chicago Build 73g

Chicago Build 78

Chicago Build 81

Chicago Build 99

Beta Version:

Chicago Build 122 Beta 1

Chicago Build 189 Beta 1.4

Chicago Build 222 German Spanish Italian French Dutch Swedish

Chicago Build 224 Beta 2

Chicago Build 225 Chinese

Chicago Build 324 German

Chicago Build 347 English Spanish German Beta 3

Chicago Build 435 Chinese

Chicago Build 440

Chicago Build 450 Danish Finnish Norwegian

Chicago Build 456

Chicago Build 462 English Dutch Spanish French German Italian Swedish

Chicago Build 468

Release Candidate:

Chicago Build 480 English German

Chicago Build 481

Chicago Build 484

Chicago Build 490 English Portugese Spanish French German Italian

Chicago Build 499 German

Chicago Build 501

Chicago Build 502

Chicago Build 708 Chinese

Chicago Build 720 Chinese Japanese Korean

Chicago Build 852

Chicago Build 950r-2 Interim

Nashville Screenshots:

Nashville Build 999

Nashville Build 1265

Memphis Screenshots:

Alpha/Developer Release Version:

Memphis Build 1351

Memphis Build 1387

Memphis Build 1423

Beta Version:

Memphis Build 1400 Beta 1

Memphis Build 1488

Memphis Build 1511

Memphis Build 1525

Memphis Build 1532

Memphis Build 1546 Beta 2

Memphis Build 1569

Memphis Build 1577

Memphis Build 1588 Chinese Beta 3

Memphis Build 1593

Memphis Build 1602 Beta 2.1

Memphis Build 1619

Memphis Build 1629 Beta 3

Memphis Build 1650

Memphis Build 1658

Memphis Build 1681

Release Candidate Version:

Memphis Build 1691 RC0

Memphis Build 1723 RC2

Memphis Build 1900 RC4

OEM Service Release Beta Version:

98OSR Build 2106 OSR1

98OSR Build 2120

98OSR Build 2150.4 OSR2

98OSR Build 2150A

Windows 98 Second Edition Release Candidate Version:

98SE Build 2183A

98SE Build 2185A RC2

Famous Hacked Version of Windows 98:

Windows 98 Third Edition Chinese

Windows 99

Georgia/Millennium Screenshots:

Alpha Version:

Georgia/Millennium Build 2332.2

Georgia/Millennium Build 2348

Georgia/Millennium Build 2350.3

Georgia/Millennium Build 2358

Georgia/Millennium Build 2368

Beta Version:

Georgia/Millennium Build 2380.2

Georgia/Millennium Build 2394

Georgia/Millennium Build 2419

Georgia/Millennium Build 2452

Georgia/Millennium Build 2460

Georgia/Millennium Build 2470

Georgia/Millennium Build 2476

Georgia/Millennium Build 2481

Georgia/Millennium Build 2491

Georgia/Millennium Build 2499.3

Georgia/Millennium Build 2499.7 English Japanese German Korean

Release Candidate Version:

Georgia/Millennium Build 2509

Georgia/Millennium Build 2513

Georgia/Millennium Build 2516

Georgia/Millennium Build 2525.6

Other screenshots:

Windows 3.1 for workgroups codename Sparta Build 14e

Windows 3.1 codename Janus Build 61d

Windows 2000 Powered

Enjoy!! :lol:

Edited by Gillian

Ah, it does bring back some fond memories :cry: (and not so fond ones, I remember the media player in Windows 95 can sometimes crash and bring a BSOD when trying to play a media file :pinch: ).

PSG22™

Ah, it does bring back some fond memories :cry: (and not so fond ones, I remember the media player in Windows 95 can sometimes crash and bring a BSOD when trying to play a media file :pinch: ).

PSG22?

Haha! It is successful to use Windows Media Player 7.1 in Windows Chicago!

wmp71.gif

Well I'll be a monkey's uncle... I thought that MS had been tweaking and slowly improving this dialog from Windows 95 all the way to Server 2003, when they had it nearly perfect for Chicago Beta 1.

network.gif

If they had continued with that, and replaced those side buttons with an "Add..." and "Properties" button for each of the four sections, along with a similarly clear "Bindings" tab, it would've been done. I'll see how Vista is when it's done downloading, but I have every confidence that the networking setup won't be as intuitive as this could've been (unless you're fine with just install it + DHCP).

Well I'll be a monkey's uncle... I thought that MS had been tweaking and slowly improving this dialog from Windows 95 all the way to Server 2003, when they had it nearly perfect for Chicago Beta 1.

network.gif

If they had continued with that, and replaced those side buttons with an "Add..." and "Properties" button for each of the four sections, along with a similarly clear "Bindings" tab, it would've been done. I'll see how Vista is when it's done downloading, but I have every confidence that the networking setup won't be as intuitive as this could've been (unless you're fine with just install it + DHCP).

However, Chicago Beta 1 is not stable to test :whistle:

  • 4 weeks later...

Nice thats funky useful aswell :) strange enough Windows ME when was finally seems still act's a Beta :p lol if anyone has had ME would know what im on about lol. Blue screens of Death and kernal errors and the constant lag and the annoying Errors poping up all over the place :D seems like one big death trap lmao

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!