Recommended Posts

I don't know about the updates, but IE6 and WMP10 updates dependancy must be changed.

Could the problem with TweakUI .cpl finally be fixed? Everyone forgot about it.

To refresh the memory, .cpl isn't there (in Control Panel) because putting shortcut there is executed BEFORE installing TweakUI, so it's useless (putting, not TUI). It should be executed AFTER. It just needs to be put under TUI installation, like before April release. Now it's above and therefore it's executed after. Please fix it.

Man I really really hate the new interface. I went back and downloaded the full install from April to get rid of that crap interface. Than I installed the updates from there. The interface sucks. I can't easily see what modules are missing (I manually remove those I don't use in window updates like the DRM one), I can't easily select all updates under a category. Wish you made a full without that crappy bloated interface the new one is.

The way it was before prevented someone from installing TweakUI without installing the control panel shortcut.

Yes, I remember, but I don't remember who it was - never mind. I didn't mean under like IN it, i meant UNDER literally, simply under, otherwise (above) it's useless. :(

What you could do, guys, is have it set up similar to the way Windows Script is set up this month.

What do you mean? :unsure:

@xyz123

currently the tweakui and tweakui cpl addons are listed as seperate items in the addon section. what the_guy proposes is to do it like this:

-- addons

-- -- tweakui

-- -- -- tweakui 210

-- -- -- tweakui cpl

although thats neater and i'll certainly do it, the problem is that they both have the same priority and the cpl one is installing first. i didnt actually know this happened until you brought it up. it will be fixed next month.

@the_guy

Sorry for the confusion, my bad. By "IN it" I meant like this (this is a tree view):

Windows Addons

...

----Copy Profile View

----TweakUI

--------TweakUI .cpl

----PowerMenu 1.5.1

...

The situation was like this before April.

Now it's like this:

Windows Addons

...

----Copy Profile View

----TweakUI .cpl

----Tweak UI (misspelled)

----PowerMenu 1.5.1

...

I suggested like this:

Windows Addons

...

----Copy Profile View

----TweakUI

----TweakUI .cpl

----PowerMenu 1.5.1

...

But now I see that you're right - it should be like you said:

Windows Addons

...

----Copy Profile View

----TweakUI parent

--------TweakUI

--------TweakUI .cpl

----PowerMenu 1.5.1

...

P. s. Another small bug everyone forgot about is that EU Screensaver can't be installed from AP (i. e. AP doesn't install it when you select it and click Update) - it must be installed manually from C:\Program Files\AutoPatcher\modules\AddOns\Screensavers\.

There is a bug when installing WindowsInstaller 3.1 v2 from Autopatcher. All the installers that use it will fail to load. I tried on several computers (3) and on all of them the .msi packages or .exe self extracting with msi inside will not work (even some with InstallShield). Will give the "1607 error". I instaled on a fresh system autopatcher without the option checked and manualy download WindowsInstaller-KB893803-v2-x86.exe and works this way.

Thanks..

will this work with ryanvm's xp slipstreamer stuff as well? (he produces a file with all teh latest patches that can be slipstreamed into win xp cd)....so ,say, if i get ryans latest download today (jun 1st), and then in 2 months time i install a machine with it, and then use autopatcher for the remaining updates ...will it work???

cheers

kev

i apologise if you get this question alot, but why on earth do you no longer release FULL monthly updates for english versions of autopatcher? i'm baffled as to why the other languages get it but english (what the site primarily uses) does not have a FULL release, and instead we have to put on update after an update after an update?

thanx for fielding my question (if you do)!

ciao

i apologise if you get this question alot, but why on earth do you no longer release FULL monthly updates for english versions of autopatcher? i'm baffled as to why the other languages get it but english (what the site primarily uses) does not have a FULL release, and instead we have to put on update after an update after an update?

thanx for fielding my question (if you do)!

ciao

Each individual release is compiled by sombody different; The English one is done by theblazingangel.

The reason that there is no English Full is that it simply wastes bandwidth for us and our mirrors. We don't have the time to spend all day uploading the file, and then people would download the full release when they could just as well download an update release. This justs increase bandwidth costs for our mirrors - and not everyone can use services like rapidshare as there are huge problems for people who are on ISP-wide proxies.

Besides, how hard is it to just download the Update release? You're, in fact, downloading less, and the process is exactly the same for you if you already have a full or a lite release.

Each individual release is compiled by sombody different; The English one is done by theblazingangel.

The reason that there is no English Full is that it simply wastes bandwidth for us and our mirrors. We don't have the time to spend all day uploading the file, and then people would download the full release when they could just as well download an update release. This justs increase bandwidth costs for our mirrors - and not everyone can use services like rapidshare as there are huge problems for people who are on ISP-wide proxies.

Besides, how hard is it to just download the Update release? You're, in fact, downloading less, and the process is exactly the same for you if you already have a full or a lite release.

thankyou for replying! i had a feeling it would be something to do with bandwidth... if bandwidth is a problem why not use torrents and try and establish a bunch of people to seed? or perhaps a server such a filefront and only release full releases every 2 or 3 months.. just me making suggestions is probably annoying (especially considering my post-count <<<---) but today i formatted and installed an old full (february i believe) and then i had to install 3 updates, and wasnt able to install all the updates i know are available (i dont know why). it would just be lovely to have a full release at least once every 2 months or so, autopatcher is a GREAT piece of software that i love to use and its becomign a bit more dificult to use.

anyway i guess i should shutup, beggers cant be choosers! thanx for autopatcher and keep up the great work!!

We do have torrents (I'm the guy who maintains the tracker), but the initial seeding is a pain in the arse.

I think the update method is great, as long as there is a full release every few months

It saves us all a lot of time

There are, every 3-4 months.

I was excited when I saw the June Beta Full Version, and I have been using it for a few weeks now and I thought everything on it was working. Untill tonite, I have just bought a new desktop system and I installed the new BETA version tonite. I usually split the update in half or in bits. Critical and Important first, then I do Tweaks and all the rest. I notced that only the Critical Updates and the UNOFFICAL IMPORTANT updates were installed. I went back again and try to install the rest of the UPDATES and still nothing. Bits and pieces like the Windows Uptime Tool and Sun Java Update would be installed, but everything else like THEMES AND SCREENSAVERS and so on would not install I tried a few more times and NOTHING. I went back to my MAIN system and I noticed that only the CRITICAL updates were installed on that machine too. I dunno if this is a COMMON problem for the beta, but I just wanted to inform you guys about the ISSUE I am having

Any more questions about my issues you can reach me at [email protected] or [email protected]

Hi all,

Noob here & just wanna say kudos to all the good work u guys are doing. I did get the autopatcher May 2k6 but didn't really know how to work it. So now that I've found u guys u can expect to hear from me some stuff after the June/July 2k6 Full update is there. Btw would it also include the IE7 Beta3 or not? Thnx in advance.

No beta stuff is ever included, so WIE7 beta 3 will have to wait.

I would like it too, but it would do more damage than good.

Why?

1.) Beta can cause problems, and then the AP team would be accused for it, or at least the people wouldn't know where's the problem - that would cause confusion.

2.) WIE7 setup requests online validation, and that problem is yet to be solved before including it.

3.) The majority of people doesn't look what do they install, so... see 1.)

4.) It raises the download size of AP for more than 10 MB, and in return... see 1.)

Don't misunderstand me, when it gets out of beta, I will be among the strongest annoyers until it gets included... :devil:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!