Recommended Posts

IBM said Wednesday that the company built 243 computers on the list of the world's top 500 supercomputers in the world. However, the bigger story may be AMD's continued rise in the rankings. While AMD processors are only in 81 supercomputers, that 's up dramatically from 25 last year.

Intel processor-based systems are down over the same period, from 333 to 301. Similarly, the Itanium processor has continued to become less relevant, falling from 79 last year to 37 systems as of the current report. Intel has been locked in a tight battle with AMD over the past year, and has seen its market share fall in desktops, laptops and now servers.

The world's most powerful supercomputer is the IBM Blue Gene/L, with a performance of 280.6 Teraflops. Two more IBM computers round out the list of the top three: the Blue Gene Watson at 91.29 teraflops, and the ASC Purple supercomputer at 75.76 teraflops.

IBM said that the company's low cost and flexible supercomputers were driving growth in the sector. "Whether we are talking about improving the accuracy of weather forecasts, designing better automobiles or improving disease research, we are seeing the advent of a new supercomputing age," Deep Computing vice president Dave Turek said.

Second to IBM is Hewlett Packard, with 154 systems. No other manufacturer had more than 5 percent of the list, or 25 systems. Even so, many smaller names were able to crack the top 10, including Silicon Graphics in fourth, Bull SA in fifth, Dell in sixth, and NEC/Sun in seventh, Cray in ninth, and NEC in tenth.

By operating system, Linux by far was the operating system of choice, covering 73 percent of the list. Unix was a distant second with 20 percent. Microsoft's Windows was only on two systems, with one of its computers based on Windows Compute Cluster Server 2003 reaching a performance of 6 teraflops, placing it 131st on the list.

Source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/474067-amd-moves-up-supercomputer-list/
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why should simply opening the Action Center ... require any significant amount of CPU cycles? Too many are ignoring the elephant in the room: today's CPUs may have similar clock frequencies to CPUs from a decade ago (~4 to 5 GHz), but they run with far higher performance per clock, even on the smallest E-cores. The Action Center is a static, minor desktop element. It ought to open instantly on any CPU made in the past 2.5 decades at even low clocks. Opening a program? Boost away. Unzipping a file? Boost to your heart's content. Right-clicking the notification area? This should be an ultra-efficient, low-impact event that opens instantly. Compare today's UI elements to Windows 7 UI elements. Today's UI elements hardly do anything more substantial or important or critical, yet now require modern-day processors to jump half a GHz to reduce their latency.
    • This is not an option lmao: it is part of the KB5094126 update, pushed to all users. There is no GUI to configure it. Reading the article should be required for commenting.
    • Can you recommend me a good Pixel 7 on eBay? Because some are saying Gen 1, and I don't think that's what I want, right?
    • Close, but it is for any application starting, not just during boot time. In fact, it probably will not improve boot time at all because during a boot, the CPU is already boosting, so a pre-boost wouldn't change anything. I agree that it isn't exciting (especially considering every other OS already does it), but it is a good thing, even if they are just playing catch up.
    • Any so called performance increase will be in milliseconds, which nobody will actually notice in real world usage.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!