ATI Tells NVIDIA "Writing is on the Wall"


Recommended Posts

That's the funniest thing I have read all day. Perhaps they make quality hardware, but there drivers sure suck. :x

Only if your using linux they suck. ATI loves microsoft and has way better driver support. Even with vista coming up that will be even more aparent.

Here's the way I see this whole thing.

ATI needed to hook up with AMD in order to look at Nvidia and start running it's mouth even more than before. It's pretty childish on ATI's side honestly.

It'll be funny when Intel hooks up with Nvidia in some kind of partnership. You know there's got to be some kind of talking going on between Intel and Nvidia since this has happened. I hope they partner up and look at AMD and ATI and say "Now what? Your move ;) "

I have two old systems that I just rebuilt for my nephews that now live with me. One is a 533mhz AMD With 3DNow, an 8mb ATI video card and 128mb's of ram. The other is a 333mhz Pentium 2, 4mb Nvidia Riva 128 video card and 128mb's of ram.

Nothing special, old parts I had laying around. Just something for them to play games on the internet (pogo, runescape) or some old PC games.

The 333mhz Intel Pentium 2/4mb Nvidia system blows away the 533mhz AMD/8mb ATI system.

The Intel system runs Quake 3 Arena pretty decently (that 4mb nvidia card was pretty good for it's day) and the other system gets as far as the game menu and crashes. I had to go get a couple patches for that game to run at all on the AMD system. It was a joke.

I will always hate AMD and ATI. Especially ATI because you really do need patches to run a lot of things it seems like. The only reason I even had anything made by them was because it was a friends old PC that he didn't want anymore and I never got around to doing anything with it and completely forgot I had it in the basement.

^ That's some serious BS mate. Do you know nothing about history? Yes AMD had some bad chips MANY years ago, then they made better chips than Intel for YEARS with much better price/performance ratio than Intel. Now Intel has managed to make something better than Intel again but AMD will top them again at some point.

That's how the PC market has been going for years just as ATi and nVIDIA kept trading places for the performance leader in the graphics cards. Did you not remember 3dfx used to be the leader in graphics cards? How times can change.

I assure you ATi will dominate the next generation of graphics cards, being in their second generation of unified shader architecture while nVIDIA won't even touch that yet. That means ATi will be the only company offering true DirectX 10 cards in the early life of Vista.

I will always hate AMD and ATI. Especially ATI because you really do need patches to run a lot of things it seems like. The only reason I even had anything made by them was because it was a friends old PC that he didn't want anymore and I never got around to doing anything with it and completely forgot I had it in the basement.

Oh really? A lot of patches? Ok one of the latest important small fix was Half-Life 2, Doom 3 also I think... Half LIfe 2 I don't even remember one but yeah they might of released one for it I can't say.

Am I the only blind **** here?

ATI doesn't release a game-specific patch at every driver release this is fanboyism at its best. And when they do, people complain? How can you complain when a company fixes a problem? Since when are patches a bad thing? They don't release patches at an alarming rate at which you get ****ed at by saying "OMG ANOTHER PATCH WHY WHY CAn"T THEY STOP SO MANY PATCHES 0mg0mg SPLAT!". If you're bitching about ATI releasing a patch once in a blue moon then I wonder how much you're bitching about Windows patching up every week.

In the end what do we care as customers? We want the best piece of hardware for the best price. I don't care if its Intel or AMD but yeah you can continue hating AMD and ATI all you want. **** man you're complaining about gaming performance on your old computers and you're what? ignoring at the same time that since the beginning of the AMD K7's, AMD has been very competitive in the gaming market and dominating with the Athlon64's until now when Finally Intel delivers something to kick AMD's ass?

BLablablalbal :wacko:

AMD should have bought nVidia, now THAT would make a good team.

I don't think that's how it would have been or could have been as we can see now. AMD and nVIDIA don't mix... I remember when Windows XP first came out, MS had to pump out a lot of patches for AMD processor.

I don't think they could afford it

Yeah my thoughts exactly. I don't think AMD can afford nVIDIA.

Here's the way I see this whole thing.

ATI needed to hook up with AMD in order to look at Nvidia and start running it's mouth even more than before. It's pretty childish on ATI's side honestly.

It'll be funny when Intel hooks up with Nvidia in some kind of partnership. You know there's got to be some kind of talking going on between Intel and Nvidia since this has happened. I hope they partner up and look at AMD and ATI and say "Now what? Your move ;) "

I have two old systems that I just rebuilt for my nephews that now live with me. One is a 533mhz AMD With 3DNow, an 8mb ATI video card and 128mb's of ram. The other is a 333mhz Pentium 2, 4mb Nvidia Riva 128 video card and 128mb's of ram.

Nothing special, old parts I had laying around. Just something for them to play games on the internet (pogo, runescape) or some old PC games.

The 333mhz Intel Pentium 2/4mb Nvidia system blows away the 533mhz AMD/8mb ATI system.

The Intel system runs Quake 3 Arena pretty decently (that 4mb nvidia card was pretty good for it's day) and the other system gets as far as the game menu and crashes. I had to go get a couple patches for that game to run at all on the AMD system. It was a joke.

I will always hate AMD and ATI. Especially ATI because you really do need patches to run a lot of things it seems like. The only reason I even had anything made by them was because it was a friends old PC that he didn't want anymore and I never got around to doing anything with it and completely forgot I had it in the basement.

I'm with you on everything you said...

Well ATI was complete crap up until the 8500(which was still flaky. The 9700 Pro was great, the 2.x series drivers were great, and here I am in 2006 loathing the 6.x series again, love the cycle with ATI. ATI has gotten sloppy again, while I think their hardware is fine their drivers are turning to crap again very fast. They're still a contender, they haven't quite degressed to pre-8500 era drivers, but I am dissapointed. To be fair though I've had problems with Nvidia before as well, so while problems do occur with everything, I think ATI's list of driver issues keeps getting bigger and bigger now, they've lost the high ground and have a serious problem in prioritizing in my opinion. If AMD could maybe point the team in the right direction all could be well again, they have the talent, they've done it before, just for some reason they're losing it.

AMD I think was alot more cinsistent, the K6 was a good step up but yeah the P2 and P3 were way better, the K7 however was even better, and the K8 is no slouch either. They've never really stumbled since they've decided to take on Intel, they don't always hold the speed crown but they've never really just floundered or released crap. I think they've got a good handle on the situation and their ultimate goals. In recent memory I'd say Intel was infinitely more reckless and silly than AMD, with the whole Netburst architecture, Rambus memory, switching to DDR-II when it was infact slower.

I think this will be an interesting time, hopefully good stuff comes out of this.

Forgot to remind NightmarE D nVIDIA is constantly patching games with new and new driver releases and many of them break compatibility or cause slowdowns for example in videos so nVIDIA isn't perfect in that aspect either.

I wouldnt bother wasting any time on him. :whistle:

Oh really? A lot of patches? Ok one of the latest important small fix was Half-Life 2, Doom 3 also I think... Half LIfe 2 I don't even remember one but yeah they might of released one for it I can't say.

Am I the only blind **** here?

ATI doesn't release a game-specific patch at every driver release this is fanboyism at its best. And when they do, people complain? How can you complain when a company fixes a problem? Since when are patches a bad thing? They don't release patches at an alarming rate at which you get ****ed at by saying "OMG ANOTHER PATCH WHY WHY CAn"T THEY STOP SO MANY PATCHES 0mg0mg SPLAT!". If you're bitching about ATI releasing a patch once in a blue moon then I wonder how much you're bitching about Windows patching up every week.

In the end what do we care as customers? We want the best piece of hardware for the best price. I don't care if its Intel or AMD but yeah you can continue hating AMD and ATI all you want. **** man you're complaining about gaming performance on your old computers and you're what? ignoring at the same time that since the beginning of the AMD K7's, AMD has been very competitive in the gaming market and dominating with the Athlon64's until now when Finally Intel delivers something to kick AMD's ass?

BLablablalbal :wacko:

ati got the **** owned out of them because of half life 2....works best on ATI yeh sure, ATI users couldnt even get to the game menu.

Microsoft does not release a patch every week. And also, microsoft patches AREN'T NECCESSARY all the time. ATI patches on the other hand are.

And also, Intel extreme owns the **** out of amd.

Forgot to remind NightmarE D nVIDIA is constantly patching games with new and new driver releases and many of them break compatibility or cause slowdowns for example in videos so nVIDIA isn't perfect in that aspect either.

bull****, i havent had any problems with nvidia since i got one about 6 years ago. ATI has way more problem.

Edited by mAcOdIn

Wow, ATI users couldn't get to the game menu? I've had HL 2 forever on my 9700 Pro and it ran great on that, I had no problem with the menu. Maybe if someone was trying to play it on a pre-8500 class card with shaders maybe. And don't call people names, this is your warning.

ati got the **** owned out of them because of half life 2....works best on ATI yeh sure, ATI users couldnt even get to the game menu.

What on Earth are you talking about? I pre-ordered Half-Life 2 - I installed it straight away and it ran perfectly on my ATi card. I have not even heard of the problems you describe, despite hanging around the Steam forums.

ATi used to have dreadful drivers but that changed with the 8500 series, though early drivers for it still had the tendency to BSOD. However, it was only a few years before that when nVidia reference drivers would produce the same results, relying on OEMs to pump out custom drivers (often arriving months late, it at all). ATi continued to improve, though they couldn't compete with the huge performance increases nVidia would manage. However, nVidia drivers went downhill and their nForce drivers were just dreadful - boot time trebled and system performance would often reduce (something to do with the IDE drivers), not to mention the nightmare I've had trying to get onboard LAN to work (I had to install a network card as several motherboards, nForce 1,2 and 4 have all had problems). Then there were the dozens of beta release nVidia would push out for graphics, fixing a problem with several games but screwing up another - not to mention the PureVideo problems they had. However, it wasn't long till ATi added the CCC and brought responsiveness crashing - it still takes ages to load up. There's no denying that ATi drivers have been very unimpressive recently but nVidia hasn't been winning any fans either.

Both ATi and nVidia have their problems. nVidia seem to win when it comes to sheer performance but when you start cranking up the AA/AF ATi come into their own - HDR + AA still isn't possible for nVidia (demonstrated most notably by Oblivion), yet ATi manages just fine thanks to their flexible and programmable architecture. However, SLI is infinitely better than Crossfire and has better support (and performance) when it comes to motherboards. Then there is ATi's dreadful Linux support, an area where nVidia does particularly well.

There are plenty of pros and cons on either side. A fan of ATi can produce a good arguement for their superiority as much as an nVidia fan. I personally side with ATi because I am more interested in image quality and, despite a few hiccups in the past, has been consistently better, though I have no loyalty. I do hope ATi's drivers improve, though with Vista there will be less flexibility and there should be less room for drivers to cause problems.

Its always interesting to see how blindly loyal people are to brands like little marketing goats. Baaaaa!

As long as technology continues to progress and be competitive, it's good for us as consumers. Whatever is best price/performance when I buy, that's what I get. The name is irrelevant. It could be a blow-me CPU with a you-suck GPU and 2 GB of pink-daisy ram, as long as it is the best deal I can get for my dollar, that's what I'm going to buy.

My 2c.

I know i'm out of touch with this whole ATi vs nVidia scene.

But i keep hearing about ATi Drivers arn't working properly, they are quite 'crap' or plain sucks. I've had ATi the last 2 years and i never, ever

had a single ATi driver problem ... Am i just lucky or can't people configure their drivers?

And also, Intel extreme owns the **** out of amd.

Maybe now they do, but before intel got their act together AMD was running past them in terms of performance. Thats how it works if you didn't know. Do you think intel would have put so much effort into their new core processors if they were not facing competition in the performance area?

Oh, and my 9600Pro always played HL2 just fine. I have also never had any driver problems with ATI. The only problem i can remember is some old 5.XX driver that made the BF2 textures turn black. I have had much more problems with my nForce3 chipset drivers.

I know i'm out of touch with this whole ATi vs nVidia scene.

But i keep hearing about ATi Drivers arn't working properly, they are quite 'crap' or plain sucks. I've had ATi the last 2 years and i never, ever

had a single ATi driver problem ... Am i just lucky or can't people configure their drivers?

Depends on what games you play. Way I see it with ATI's driver problems(outside of the CCC which isn't really a bug just a pain in the butt) is that they're almast always a problem on something niche, not used by most people. Like MoH; the spearhead expansion, how many people are still playing that right now and are they going to put the same work into fixing MoH:spearhead as opposed to say a Battlefield 2 problem? How long was CoH broken for ATI?

The problem I have with ATI's drivers now is that the problems they create stay on the list for months in some cases for over a year, which is what happened for some of their TV out functions. Of course this is still something that could happen with Nvidia but since they don't have a list of known issues it's harder to track this stuff, so it's easier to attack ATI because they hand you the ammunition. When you're Nvidia and you never acknowledge a problem and it persists across drivers it's annoying, when you're ATI and you acknowledge the problem and it persists it's like a slap in the face. That's the key difference, both Nvidia and ATI let bugs in their drivers pass through, both of them choose something else to focus on rather than fixing some of these bugs, but only with ATI do you actually get written confirmation that yes they're ignoring it. With Nvidia you can claim ignorance, with ATI it's negligence, and that's aggrevating. Then to see the list of driver additions and to see that they've tweaked the CCC and increased a benchmark score while not touching the bug that affects a game you can not physically run, it's just aggrevating.

My last Nvidia card was a geforce 3 card, great card although once the XP driver 28.XX series came out I got instant bluescreens until their next official driver, so that was an annoying wait that was a few months, it's not an ATI only occurance.

But yes, I have a huge problem with ATI's drivers right now. The last 2 releases flat out do not install on my system while everything prior to them worked, I've tried formatting, and man has Microsofts call in activation service gotten worse with their stupid say aloud your activation number to the computer than repeat the process to the person who finally picks up. And after a format they want me to clean my drivers? Use the Driver Uninstall feature of a driverset that doesn't install? I hate tech support. Why don't they ask me if the surge protecter is turned on next. It's so obvious that they changed something in 6.5 up that just doesn't work on my system and they tell me to use a driver cleaner or increase my AGP transfer rate when I'm using Pci-express, and all that I need for them to do is ask me for something, a log or some crap that I can send them, not to go off on some lame script.

Although i don't think this was a good move on either ATi's or AMD's part, I hope they both learn allot of things off each other, and lets all hope it starts a GPU price war :D

About this HL2 & ATi thing....if anyone remembers, game shops started selling the game 2 days earlier than they were meant too....so I had the game installed and running the minute Steam decrypted the files.....and my 9800Pro had no problems with it at all, so i don't know what people are smokin :)

nVidia won't be defeated easily, I'm sure.

I had one ATi card, and it kept taking me out of games, and displaying a message a long the lines of "The GPU has encountered an error and has been reset". Took it back to the store, changed it for my current nVidia which is still going strong. I'm always very wary of trying a product again, after there has been a fault like that - I would understand if it did it after a year of use or something, but not on something brand new.

My only comment regarding support of games between nVidia and ATi, is that I have noticed a lot of FAQS (for games I play) that have several items stating compatibility issues with ATi cards. Not normally something that makes the game unplayable, usually something like a certain effect makes the graphics scrambled so it has to be disabled.

....

The problem I have with ATI's drivers now is that the problems they create stay on the list for months in some cases for over a year, which is what happened for some of their TV out functions. Of course this is still something that could happen with Nvidia but since they don't have a list of known issues it's harder to track this stuff, so it's easier to attack ATI because they hand you the ammunition. When you're Nvidia and you never acknowledge a problem and it persists across drivers it's annoying, when you're ATI and you acknowledge the problem and it persists it's like a slap in the face. That's the key difference, both Nvidia and ATI let bugs in their drivers pass through, both of them choose something else to focus on rather than fixing some of these bugs, but only with ATI do you actually get written confirmation that yes they're ignoring it. With Nvidia you can claim ignorance, with ATI it's negligence, and that's aggrevating. Then to see the list of driver additions and to see that they've tweaked the CCC and increased a benchmark score while not touching the bug that affects a game you can not physically run, it's just aggrevating.

....

Contrary to what you think, nVidia does list the open issues with their drivers on every release. The details can always be found in the corresponding release notes for each driver, and have done so for as long as I can remember (IIRC, release notes during the Geforce 2 era had issues listed).

But the disparity is that many times you don't get an official release, you'd go months without a real driver and in those months be playing with unsupported and undocumented drivers from the board makers like Asus and the like.

Edit This might have changed post 9700 Pro era as that's when I jumped ship, but in the past new official Nvidia drivers were pretty rare.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
    • Welcome to Neowin! Enjoy your stay!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      272
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      74
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!