Tour de France winner Landis tests positive


Recommended Posts

I just found it funny that he almost collapsed on the last climb in stage 16 which dropped him more than 8 minutes back. Then the next stage he suddenly blew everyone away and closed to less than 30 seconds from the leader. I hope it isn't true, but if it is, he deservs to have the title stripped.

Edit: Also, the title is misleading, he is still champion as of right now.

They said that the doping would not have been the cause for his comeback. On the report I was watching on TV, they explained how doctors said it would take weeks for the effects to be noticeable, not hours.

Interesting article about the tests:

http://cbs.sportsline.com/cycling/story/9574621

Tour De France champion Floyd Landis' results on a urine test that spots elevated levels of performance-enhancing testosterone are a mystery and "don't add up," a leading doping expert said Thursday.

Landis' team revealed Thursday that his urine sample last week showed "an unusual level of testosterone/epitestosterone."

Testosterone creams, pills and injections can build muscle and strength and improve recovery time after exertion when used over a period of several weeks, according to Dr. Gary Wadler, a member of the World Anti-Doping Agency and a spokesman for the American College of Sports Medicine.

But if Landis had been a user, earlier urine tests during the Tour would have been affected, too, Wadler said. Landis' first reported abnormal result was last Thursday, after his amazing come-from-behind performance in stage 17 of the race.

One-time use of steroids could result in an abnormal test, but it would have no effect on performance and could not account for Landis' astounding feat Thursday, "so something's missing here," Wadler said. "It just doesn't add up."

... (cont)

Yeah his testosterone wasn't high it was the ratio to the epitestosterone, they said that could be off possibly due to the fact that he had cortisone shots in his hip or the fact that he kicked back a few the night before. If the B test comes out positive then you can point a finger and say he cheated.

Men, he took drugs....thats has been proved.

Few months ago a french laboratory did some tests with previous blood samples (they keep for future inspection, as you might know) and they identified syntetic hormones.

Of course this affair was covered, nobody wants to blur the Armstrong's almight career.

(ill not discuss this, i simply dont care....if you want more information, go get it)

Btw, pratically ALL top ciclists take drugs.

Its a well known fact.

The problem is that the identification methods are always few years behind the new products creation.

yeah, like thats a trustworthy source. lance was constantly tested, suprised all the time, for 7 years straight or whatever. if he was guilty, they would have caught him.

too bad about this landis guy though, but did anybody really care about this years TDF anyways?

Men, he took drugs....thats has been proved.

Few months ago a french laboratory did some tests with previous blood samples (they keep for future inspection, as you might know) and they identified syntetic hormones.

Of course this affair was covered, nobody wants to blur the Armstrong's almight career.

(ill not discuss this, i simply dont care....if you want more information, go get it)

Btw, pratically ALL top ciclists take drugs.

Its a well known fact.

The problem is that the identification methods are always few years behind the new products creation.

What, you mean this French laboratory?

The report, commissioned late last year by the International Cycling Union, cleared the record seven-time Tour de France champion of allegations that he used performance-enhancing drugs during his first win in 1999.

It said tests on urine samples were conducted improperly and fell so short of scientific standards that it was "completely irresponsible" to suggest they "constitute evidence of anything."

The investigation also concluded that the French laboratory that handled the samples and the World Anti-Doping Agency "violated applicable rules on athlete confidentiality by commenting publicly on the alleged positive findings."

The report recommended convening a tribunal to discuss possible legal and ethical violations by WADA, which is headed by Dick Pound, and to consider "appropriate sanctions to remedy the violations."

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • They already threw the Ultra 1st gen under the bus?
    • Right, Google... because that's who this is going to. Google, the company who's entire business model is geared around ad revenue and your personal data.
    • That is the natural course for regulations. First to protect the consumer. Then to protect the business/industry from upstart competition. There are countless examples across history.
    • I have never been a huge fan of libre, it feels really good but exactly when you need an advance feature for data wrangling it falls short every time or has bugs. I am all for euro office if they can deliver a good and usable alternative to MS office with backing of govt function.
    • Go on, I'll bite. How does windows (nice comment on an 'article' which doesn't actually involve it ) lock users out of their data then? Been using it since 3.1 back in 92 and not once have I been locked out of my data? Perhaps you mean Bitlocker? In which case the average user (who doesn't mess about) will have been forced to use a MSA, and in which case the recovery key would have been saved to said account..... If the user did happen to bodge around and not use an MSA then Bitlocker wouldn't have become live (as it cannot without a safe place to store the key) I want to point out Bitlocker and MSA are not connected and you can of course force it on without a safe place to store the key, but you do that with your eyes open. So your standard consumer who knows no better sets up an MSA, gets bitlocker and a recovery key stored off box, with a route to reset their password. All of this notwithstanding the fact, if your data is important, you back it up, no ifs, no buts, no-ones responsibility other than your own. Important data lives in at least two locations, one of which is offline and recovery is tested, otherwise that data wasn't really that important. Disks, fail, laptops get lost, phones end up down the toilet, tablets get stolen, if your only copy of data is on a single device you're doing it wrong.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      86
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!