Firefox 2.0 Beta 1 (Nightly) New Icons


Recommended Posts

my ui tweaker extension can remove that

Can your UI Tweaker prevent the Bookmarks Sidebar from pushing all the tabs across the page and instead actually present itself below the tabs? I'd really like an extension to do this.

Thanks mod for adjusting the title btw.

Nevermind the icons, are there any reasons to update besides that? I'm using 2.0 beta 1. I understand this is a nightly build but I'm just curious if anything else changed? Like I assume there have been some key bugfixes, or is it just icons? Let me know! Thanks!

Edited by mancode20
Nevermind the icons, are there any reasons to update besides that? I'm using 2.0 beta 1. I understand this is a nightly build but I'm just curious if anything else changed? Like I assume there have been some key bugfixes, or is it just icons? Let me know! Thanks!
The nightly was still listed as a Beta 1 release. I'd just wait for Beta 2 to come out, since that will likely have the full style change, and not just the icons. ;)

With firefox you can change pref to have one tab on the right (old style), close button on each tab, or a close button on the active tab (what your referring to as invisible close buttons).

Just the default is one close on every tab.

And how exactly do you do that? I don't see that under the tab options in tools -> options.

And how exactly do you do that? I don't see that under the tab options in tools -> options.

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser.tabs.closeButtons

Same as all the other nightlies :)

By the way, and I know it's still early supernova so I'm not saying it's finished or anything, but I'm glad they finally got preliminary favicon-in-the-menu support in here.

What do you mean? Like the favicons showing up when you bookmark a site and not after the first visit after clicking the bookmark?

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser.tabs.closeButtons

What do you mean? Like the favicons showing up when you bookmark a site and not after the first visit after clicking the bookmark?

I mean the favicons showing up at all. This is the first time where the OS X version actually shows favicons I know I didn't say OS X specifically in the post, but I was playing off the screenshot provided my previous post/screenshot about OS X :D)

It's okay, fits in nicely with Windows XP's Royale.

Can't get away from Safari tho, haven't seen a browser to date that beats it's way of displaying RSS feeds. :cool: And of course the small detail that Firefox isn't a native browser on Mac OS X but a port instead. :(

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Too soon, I'm still not over this death!
    • Normally, I admit when a title is clickbait (unfortunately, it's become somewhat necessary in AI-dominated news sections today), but in this case, all supported versions is implied and doesn't need to be spelled out in the title. Of course, I'm covering a Patch Tuesday update but that is only available to supported Windows SKUs. All our coverage relates to supported Windows software and SKUs only unless we expressly state that it's "unsupported", "unofficial", or "third-party". I'm sorry, but supported/official SKUs don't need to be spelled out as such in every Neowin headline.
    • ALL versions or ALL SUPPORTED versions? Neowin does it again.
    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      586
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!