Recommended Posts

Yeah! Great news.

I had already taught my 5 year old that it wasn't a real planet anyway.

[Thread Moved from GD to SS]

heh, the end to our solar system is now uranus.

No, that would be Neptune. Although I can see how the other would be fitting.

We now have four rock/mantle planets (Earth being the largest) and four gas giants (Jupiter being the largest) and zero ice balls.

Why do they do this? Why re-write we have learned to be conventional thinking? Whot benefit is there to saying "Oh, this is no longer a planet"?

It deals with the process of understanding what nature is telling us, science builds on doubt. If science didn't doubt itself then we wouldn't be as intelligent of a species as we are, we'd still be riding horsedrawn buggies and telling mythological tales......oh wait.

what about that new planet they found (and recently named i think) beyound pluto?

Even one of the guys who found it doesn't think it should be considered a planet. If Pluto has been declassified then you can bet that our solar system has 8 planets and that will now never change.

Pluto and XB313 (aka Xena) will be called Plutons or Planetoids or something to that effect.

http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/ (from my sig)

We knew 9 planets was wrong. The only question was should be go with 8 or 10+?

I could say the same thing about Earth being flat, but luckily it was proved to be a sphere.

Not really the same. Flat and round are definite descriptions.

We classified it as a "Planet" and now it is a "Pluton" - explain how re-classifying it is the same...

Not really the same. Flat and round are definite descriptions.

We classified it as a "Planet" and now it is a "Pluton" - explain how re-classifying it is the same...

It has been given a different (and more accurate) description. The American who discovered it said that it was the size of earth which it clearly isn't. It is actually considerably smaller than our moon.

Wikipedia is quick:

Pluto was until recently considered the ninth and smallest of the traditional planets of the Solar system, but on August 24, 2006 it was 'demoted' and stripped of its planetary status by the International Astronomical Union at their Prague meeting.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto

Why do they do this? Why re-write we have learned to be conventional thinking? Whot benefit is there to saying "Oh, this is no longer a planet"?

Who said it should benefit anyone? what the hell are you saying? They came up for a definition of what a planet really is, and pluto doesn't fit this new description. Anyway, pluto's status was already a raging debate between astronomist. The majority of them now say it is an ejected mass from the Kuiper belt. Also, if it would've been accepted as a planet, then they would've had to include Xena, Sedna and Quaoar as planet also? They are other roaming ejected Kuiper belt object that revolves around the sun just like pluto.

The ONLY reason why it took so long to get pluto out of the selected few is because it's the only supposed "planet" that as been discovered by the Americans.. BWEEE, biiiig deal. Get over with it.

Now, they need to make the same things for moons... Jupiter now have a count of about 60 moons... lol!!! bull****. Most of them are asteroid who don't even have a mass big enough to be spherical that revolves around the planet. They are ASTEROIDS damn it. Call them orbiting asteroids I don't care, but please... I don't want to teach my kids the 60 moons of jupiters :p

I could say the same thing about Earth being flat, but luckily it was proved to be a sphere.

thank you, good example

heh, the end to our solar system is now uranus.

hmmm... Am I the first one to notice this comment or it's a joke or something?

hikkk..hehe

jupiter...... uranus..... NEPTUNE....! wake up!!

thank you, good example

hmmm... Am I the first one to notice this comment or it's a joke or something?

hikkk..hehe

jupiter...... uranus..... NEPTUNE....! wake up!!

Well, actually, the order is jupiter, SATURN, uranus, neptune. :shiftyninja:

So really, the phrase "planet" was without a coherrant definition, and even so we were technically wrong to have ever called it a planet?

This new schema just reinforces that?

If that's the case then fair enough I guess. At least there is a reason for it. I just hate re-learning things when nothing has changed.

Sounds like a good idea, makes much more sense to have 8 planets rather than 50+ :yes:

I always like Pluto, probably because it was discovered on my birthday (albeit 51 years before I was born lol).

I remember learning the order of the planets as a child, and saying them over and over to get them to stick in my head.

"Mercury - Venus - Earth - Mars - Jupiter - Saturn - Uranus - Neptune - Pluto".

Saying it now without Pluto at the end feels as though there is something missing (well there is), but its the sound of it that sentance that feels funny now too. I hope you lot know what I'm saying :p

Sounds like a good idea, makes much more sense to have 8 planets rather than 50+ :yes:

I always like Pluto, probably because it was discovered on my birthday (albeit 51 years before I was born lol).

I remember learning the order of the planets as a child, and saying them over and over to get them to stick in my head.

"Mercury - Venus - Earth - Mars - Jupiter - Saturn - Uranus - Neptune - Pluto".

Saying it now without Pluto at the end feels as though there is something missing (well there is), but its the sound of it that sentance that feels funny now too. I hope you lot know what I'm saying :p

It will sound better than:

"Mercury - Venus - Earth - Mars - Ceres -Jupiter - Saturn - Uranus - Neptune - Pluto - Charon - Xena".

Not to mention 40+ more that would likely have needed to be added over the next few decades.

It will sound better than:

"Mercury - Venus - Earth - Mars - Ceres -Jupiter - Saturn - Uranus - Neptune - Pluto - Charon - Xena".

Not to mention 40+ more that would likely have needed to be added over the next few decades.

Don't forget Gabriel, can't have Xena without her. :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I found that stability back then was really down to the motherboard manufacturer. Back then i stuck with Microstar motherboards and VIA chipsets as they were ultra reliable. Most stuff was done with jumpers and left little room for user created problems 👍
    • Yes, Scoop was created to promote Coreutils for Windows. You can still see early versions of their website on the Web Archive. It was a joke that nobody took seriously. Microsoft's implementation of Coreutils, however, are built in Rust.
    • Looks like EA's Star Wars Zero Company will be out this August by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Over a year ago, EA surprise announced that a team of former Firaxis members is working on a brand-new Star Wars game. Dubbed Zero Company, the title would have XCOM-like turn-based tactics gameplay as players manage a squad of professionals from all over the galaxy. Now, just ahead of an official announcement, it looks like the release date has leaked out. The upcoming Summer Game Fest presentation on Friday is when EA is supposed to show off the title's gameplay footage, with fans also expecting it to reveal a release date. However, the ever-reliable billbil-kun from Dealabs says they have already managed to find out when the game is coming out and what versions fans will have the option of purchasing. Per the leak, Star Wars Zero Company has an August 27, 2026, release date attached to it. The title is slated to release on PC, Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 with a $49.99 standard and $59.99 Deluxe edition. The leaker also adds that there won't be any early access perk attached to this special edition. Pre-orders could kick off alongside the official announcement this Friday, too. For those unfamiliar with the title, Bit Reactor is developing Star Wars Zero Company with help from Respawn Entertainment and Lucasfilm Games. The EA-published title is said to be set during the "twilight of the Clone Wars." We will have to wait and see if base building and management mechanics from the XCOM series will be present here, too. "You will step into the shoes of Hawks, a former Republic officer who leads Zero Company — an unconventional outfit of professionals for hire hailing from across the galaxy," reads the game description. "Hawks and Zero Company are recruited for an operation that pits them against an emerging threat that will consume the galaxy if left unchecked. To succeed, Hawks will lead a team of uneasy allies who must set aside their differences to overcome nearly impossible odds." You can catch the Star Wars Zero Company extended gameplay reveal at the Summer Game Fest showcase that's kicking off on Friday at 2 pm PT / 5 pm ET.
    • All their other games always had a new cast and new story, so that's not very surprising. The new dev is worrisome though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      233
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      78
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      68
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      58
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!