Recommended Posts

Yeah! Great news.

I had already taught my 5 year old that it wasn't a real planet anyway.

[Thread Moved from GD to SS]

heh, the end to our solar system is now uranus.

No, that would be Neptune. Although I can see how the other would be fitting.

We now have four rock/mantle planets (Earth being the largest) and four gas giants (Jupiter being the largest) and zero ice balls.

Why do they do this? Why re-write we have learned to be conventional thinking? Whot benefit is there to saying "Oh, this is no longer a planet"?

It deals with the process of understanding what nature is telling us, science builds on doubt. If science didn't doubt itself then we wouldn't be as intelligent of a species as we are, we'd still be riding horsedrawn buggies and telling mythological tales......oh wait.

what about that new planet they found (and recently named i think) beyound pluto?

Even one of the guys who found it doesn't think it should be considered a planet. If Pluto has been declassified then you can bet that our solar system has 8 planets and that will now never change.

Pluto and XB313 (aka Xena) will be called Plutons or Planetoids or something to that effect.

http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/ (from my sig)

We knew 9 planets was wrong. The only question was should be go with 8 or 10+?

I could say the same thing about Earth being flat, but luckily it was proved to be a sphere.

Not really the same. Flat and round are definite descriptions.

We classified it as a "Planet" and now it is a "Pluton" - explain how re-classifying it is the same...

Not really the same. Flat and round are definite descriptions.

We classified it as a "Planet" and now it is a "Pluton" - explain how re-classifying it is the same...

It has been given a different (and more accurate) description. The American who discovered it said that it was the size of earth which it clearly isn't. It is actually considerably smaller than our moon.

Wikipedia is quick:

Pluto was until recently considered the ninth and smallest of the traditional planets of the Solar system, but on August 24, 2006 it was 'demoted' and stripped of its planetary status by the International Astronomical Union at their Prague meeting.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto

Why do they do this? Why re-write we have learned to be conventional thinking? Whot benefit is there to saying "Oh, this is no longer a planet"?

Who said it should benefit anyone? what the hell are you saying? They came up for a definition of what a planet really is, and pluto doesn't fit this new description. Anyway, pluto's status was already a raging debate between astronomist. The majority of them now say it is an ejected mass from the Kuiper belt. Also, if it would've been accepted as a planet, then they would've had to include Xena, Sedna and Quaoar as planet also? They are other roaming ejected Kuiper belt object that revolves around the sun just like pluto.

The ONLY reason why it took so long to get pluto out of the selected few is because it's the only supposed "planet" that as been discovered by the Americans.. BWEEE, biiiig deal. Get over with it.

Now, they need to make the same things for moons... Jupiter now have a count of about 60 moons... lol!!! bull****. Most of them are asteroid who don't even have a mass big enough to be spherical that revolves around the planet. They are ASTEROIDS damn it. Call them orbiting asteroids I don't care, but please... I don't want to teach my kids the 60 moons of jupiters :p

I could say the same thing about Earth being flat, but luckily it was proved to be a sphere.

thank you, good example

heh, the end to our solar system is now uranus.

hmmm... Am I the first one to notice this comment or it's a joke or something?

hikkk..hehe

jupiter...... uranus..... NEPTUNE....! wake up!!

thank you, good example

hmmm... Am I the first one to notice this comment or it's a joke or something?

hikkk..hehe

jupiter...... uranus..... NEPTUNE....! wake up!!

Well, actually, the order is jupiter, SATURN, uranus, neptune. :shiftyninja:

So really, the phrase "planet" was without a coherrant definition, and even so we were technically wrong to have ever called it a planet?

This new schema just reinforces that?

If that's the case then fair enough I guess. At least there is a reason for it. I just hate re-learning things when nothing has changed.

Sounds like a good idea, makes much more sense to have 8 planets rather than 50+ :yes:

I always like Pluto, probably because it was discovered on my birthday (albeit 51 years before I was born lol).

I remember learning the order of the planets as a child, and saying them over and over to get them to stick in my head.

"Mercury - Venus - Earth - Mars - Jupiter - Saturn - Uranus - Neptune - Pluto".

Saying it now without Pluto at the end feels as though there is something missing (well there is), but its the sound of it that sentance that feels funny now too. I hope you lot know what I'm saying :p

Sounds like a good idea, makes much more sense to have 8 planets rather than 50+ :yes:

I always like Pluto, probably because it was discovered on my birthday (albeit 51 years before I was born lol).

I remember learning the order of the planets as a child, and saying them over and over to get them to stick in my head.

"Mercury - Venus - Earth - Mars - Jupiter - Saturn - Uranus - Neptune - Pluto".

Saying it now without Pluto at the end feels as though there is something missing (well there is), but its the sound of it that sentance that feels funny now too. I hope you lot know what I'm saying :p

It will sound better than:

"Mercury - Venus - Earth - Mars - Ceres -Jupiter - Saturn - Uranus - Neptune - Pluto - Charon - Xena".

Not to mention 40+ more that would likely have needed to be added over the next few decades.

It will sound better than:

"Mercury - Venus - Earth - Mars - Ceres -Jupiter - Saturn - Uranus - Neptune - Pluto - Charon - Xena".

Not to mention 40+ more that would likely have needed to be added over the next few decades.

Don't forget Gabriel, can't have Xena without her. :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google are hyprocrites for signing this. They have been pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft, only they do it on Android and ChromeOS.
    • In some countries the law has forced Microsoft to display a menu on a fresh install of Windows which asks which web browser you want and it will install that browser. This doesn't add any bloat to Windows. It simply an additional step when setting up a new PC.
    • Chrome is also a first party browser on Android and ChromeOS. And on those systems, Google is pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft does on Windows.
    • Unofficial script lets you install unreleased Windows 11 features without Microsoft Account by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily evolving the Windows Insider Program over the years, introducing new channels and testing paths that allow enthusiasts to experience upcoming and yet-to-be-released Windows features (some interesting hidden ones too) before they reach the public. However, one long-standing requirement has remained largely unchanged as users are generally expected to enroll in the Program and with a Microsoft account. That's where a third-party tool called "OfflineInsiderEnroll" can help. OfflineInsiderEnroll is said to be a lightweight script that enables access to Windows Insider Program builds on systems that are not signed in with a Microsoft account. Essentially the tool configures the necessary Insider settings locally and hence allows users to select and switch between available preview channels while continuing to receive builds through the normal Windows Update channel. If you are wondering how it manages to do so, it is made possible by a Registry value known as TestFlags. When configured to"0x20", Windows stops communicating with Microsoft's online Insider enrollment services thus preventing locally configured Insider settings from being overwritten. This allows the script to apply its own channel configuration directly through the Registry as Windows Update does not verify whether a device has been officially enrolled in the Insider Program or not. Previously the utility has had already supported the traditional Insider branches including Dev, Beta, and Release Preview. However following Microsoft’s recent restructuring of its preview channels, the script has now been updated. The latest OfflineInsiderEnroll version, 2.6.6, adds support for the newly introduced Insider channel lineup. As such, users can now choose from several Experimental channels in addition to Beta and Release Preview options. The update also retains tools for refreshing the Insider cache, resetting Insider settings, and completely stopping Insider enrollment when needed. Keep in mind though that will need elevated privileges when running the script (run as Admin). You can get the latest version of OfflineInsiderEnroll from this page on its official GitHub repo.
    • The "Classic" Outlook has done that for a few years as well. The option to even change that is really hidden away too... It really shouldn't be hard to respect user defaults. Sadly we are the product now, not Outlook. To change in the Classic Outlook: File > Options > Advanced > change "Open hyperlinks from Outlook in"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!