Recommended Posts

Windows Vista intensive installation

Being a technical beta tester for Windows Vista Pre-RC1 has it's up's and downs, although it can be very frustrating when you decide to test an operating system which is going to be the biggest change since Windows 2000 Professional, and the biggest upgrade for developers and software vendors ever. (well might not be ever; but it's pretty big)

I decided to put Windows Vista to the test and first of all run the upgrade through Windows XP Professional, and there was no surprise at the end of the installation it failed. Which was not disappointing at all because I had a strong feeling it would fail, considering it took an astonishing three hours to install.

I decided to run the upgrade for one reason, there are going to be people who will want to keep their existing files and programs because they do not have the facilities to backup their existing data and programs. Upgrading over Windows XP Home or Professional Edition is something I would not recommend anyway because it can cause instability and the OS can become unstable.

I then installed a fresh installation on the same partition as Windows XP, which again people are going to go ahead and perform this type of installation. Again this took a staggering 3hrs and 20mins to install the operating system.

What NOT to do when installing Windows Vista.

1. Do not upgrade over Windows XP Home or Professional (SP2 must be installed to perform upgrade).

2. Do not install on the same partition as Windows XP Home or Professional (SP2 must be installed).

3. Do not at any time turn off or disrupt the installation.

4. Do not assume that all your software is compatible with Windows Vista because software developers and vendors are working with Microsoft to make your software compatible. (well not all of them but the important ones are).

What YOU should do when installing Windows Vista.

1. Create a separate partition of around 12GB is enough, using Partition Magic and then call it VistaBeta (or whatever you want to call it). Windows Vista needs around 8.5Gb of HDD space to install.

2. Run the installation via Windows XP Home or Professional, when you have the option of which partition you want to install Windows Vista on, make sure you select the new partition you created in step one.

The installation should take approximately 45mins to install (this might be different on older machines). Below is a time list of my installation after my tests.

Installation:

Copying windows files 16:10sec

Expanding files 14:23sec

Installing features 5sec

Installing updates 2sec

Completing installation 37:33sec

To Desktop and finalizing installation 4:40sec

Loading to desktop for the fist time 6:36sec

Total time for installation: 48:09sec (which is a lot slower than Windows XP Professional, considering what is under the "hood" and what the capabilities are with Windows Vista. I can understand the size of the installation)

Rebooted machine and loading to desktop 2:36sec (OK... not bad)

Edited by Cornflake Addict

Actually if you're a tester, upgrading 2000/XPSP2 is encouraged. It's going to be the route regular Joe Schmoe will most likely use. I upgraded XP no prob, it's not too bad except it takes forever and a day to complete. Just thought I'd point that out ;).

Actually if you're a tester, upgrading 2000/XPSP2 is encouraged. It's going to be the route regular Joe Schmoe will most likely use. I upgraded XP no prob, it's not too bad except it takes forever and a day to complete. Just thought I'd point that out ;).

With 19 years experience behind me, I would never encourage anybody to upgrade an operating system ever. You are better off installing a freash installation on a new partition. Stability comes first.

I agree with what you're saying, and yes Joe Public will probably use the upgrade instead of a clean installation. but, what the point I have put to Microsoft... Is the length of time it takes to upgrade people are going to think their system has crashed or there is something not right with the upgrade and turn of their computers whilst installing the upgrade.

The upgrade installation should be made better or novice people are just either not going to bother upgrading or will complain they can not install it.

Upgrade Installtion:

Copying windows files 1hr:50min

Expanding files 1hr:23sec

Installing featurs 5sec

Installing updates 2sec

Completing installation 2hrs:10sec

To Desktop and finalizing installation 9:14sec

Loading to desktop for the fist time 8:01sec

Total time for installation: 5hrs:7:15sec (which is basically not exceptable, in my view.)

A clean installtion takes 45min to install and you're done.

it took you 48:09sec to install vista?

i am wondering if this is right or do you mean 48mins? i havent installed vista, probably cos my laptop is so slow! how do you install it so quick, what comp do you have?

and over 5hrs for an upgrade! that's just crazy!

(ps. it is spelt "acceptable")

The upgrade process has been notoriously slow... they're working on it; much better than the few hours it used to be :pinch:.

Could you list your specs please?

edit: Because I would really like to know why its slow for you.

it took you 48:09sec to install vista?

i am wondering if this is right or do you mean 48mins? i havent installed vista, probably cos my laptop is so slow! how do you install it so quick, what comp do you have?

and over 5hrs for an upgrade! that's just crazy!

(ps. it is spelt "acceptable")

48: is taken from my stopwatch which basically means minutes. 48 minues for the installation.

Could you list your specs please?

edit: Because I would really like to know why its slow for you.

I'm using a laptop as a testbed with the following spec, I have had feedback from MS with regards to the failed installation, so there is an initial problem somewhere.

- Intel? Pentium? 4 processor 3.0 GHz with HT Technology

- Microsoft? Windows? XP Home Edition

- 512 MB DDR RAM (upgraded to 1GB DDR RAM)

- 60GB Hard Disk Drive

- DVD-R/RW

- 15.4'' Wide View super fine TFT colour display

By 1:96sec do you mean 2:36?

Yeah I did, it was a long hard day thanks for pointing that out.

I'm surprised that you found the installation so slow but obviously there is a bug somewhere...

I put Vista pre-RC1 on my Mac Mini 1.66GHz Core Duo and it blasted on in about 30 mins from me first inserting the CD to being on a finished desktop...

I'm surprised that you found the installation so slow but obviously there is a bug somewhere...

I put Vista pre-RC1 on my Mac Mini 1.66GHz Core Duo and it blasted on in about 30 mins from me first inserting the CD to being on a finished desktop...

Yeah there is a bug I sent the setupact.log file to them and there is an issue somewhere when upgrading.

I upgraded 5472 to 5536. Never again, it took an hour and a half to complete and I immediately saw that it wasn't half as stable as everybody else was saying.

I have RC1 now and I'll be doing a clean install.

Btw, I had previously only clean installed. I wanted to test the upgrade in the previous case.

I upgraded 5472 to 5536. Never again, it took an hour and a half to complete and I immediately saw that it wasn't half as stable as everybody else was saying.

I have RC1 now and I'll be doing a clean install.

Btw, I had previously only clean installed. I wanted to test the upgrade in the previous case.

OMG it was dreadful running the upgrade I thought it would never end. I just run the installation on my main PC with a clean installation and it flew through the installation like a rocket in 38mins and when I got to the desktop and installed my ATI drivers for Vista. My jaw dropped to the floor and my eyes popped out.

Running Vista on a powerful machine is a must... you can not get the just of the power until you run Vista on a machine which can handle the power under the hood of Windows Vista.

:yes: Anybody who has a beast of a machine knows what I am talking about. The way the winodws open, the stile of the theme.

OMG awesome. :blush: :blush: :blush:

I always do and always will do fresh installs.

Latest 5536 took me about 30-40 mins from pressing any key to boot the CD to booting into the desktop. The first version of vista I ever tried, 5203 or something took about 2 hours to install and always took 3 mins or so to shutdown, this Pre RC1 takes only a few seconds.

Now I can use it a potentially fullspeed, vista is alot more appealing.

Now just for NVIDIA to get some updated drivers for it and I will be laughing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It use to be a nightmare, with LibreOffice supporting a newer draft ODF standard by default, and Microsoft Office supporting the older non-draft standard. Now that they both support the same version of ODF, they should be interoperable.
    • Brave Browser 1.91.171 by Razvan Serea Brave Browser is a lightning-fast, secure web browser that stands out from the competition with its focus on privacy, security, and speed. With features like HTTPS Everywhere and built-in tracker blocking, Brave keeps your online activities safe from prying eyes. Brave is one of the safest browsers on the market today. It blocks third-party data storage. It protects from browser fingerprinting. And it does all this by default. Speed - Brave is built on Chromium, the same technology that powers Google Chrome, and is optimized for speed, providing a fast and responsive browsing experience. Brave Browser also features Brave Rewards, a system that rewards users with Basic Attention Tokens (BAT) for viewing opt-in ads. This innovative system provides an alternative revenue model for content creators and a way to support the Brave community. SlimBrave Neo takes all the good things about Brave and makes them even better by keeping everything clean, light, and privacy-focused. It removes the extra clutter, turns off features you might not need, and cuts down on anything that could slow you down or collect unnecessary data. Because it relies on simple settings and policies instead of modifying the browser itself, you still get full Brave compatibility—just in a smoother, lighter, and more privacy-friendly package. Brave Browser 1.91.171 changelog: General Fixed Cardano not being disabled on upgrade to Brave Origin. Upgraded Chromium to 149.0.7827.103. Origin Removed “Survey Panelist” setting from brave://settings/privacy. Fixed P3A and usage ping under brave://settings/privacy being displayed on first launch on Linux. Upgraded Chromium to 149.0.7827.103. Download: Brave Browser 64-bit | 1.2 MB (Freeware) Download: Brave Browser 32-bit View: Brave Homepage | Offline Installers | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hi. As the title suggests, I can't access the forum on my phone. I'm using Edge on Android and when I try to navigate to the forum I get a "we value your privacy" popup and none of the buttons are clickable. It effectively stonewalls me from reading any forum content.
    • Honestly you're not wrong about AdGuard. Neowin frequently has lifetime license discounts for them and that's how I got my cheap family license a few years ago to run it on all my devices.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      197
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!