explorer folder background image


Recommended Posts

I've been searching for ever and found plenty and I mean plenty of info on how to give a folder a background image but I cant seem to find out how to make it a fixed image background rather than patterned. I've been messing around with the folder.ini and adding html(<BODY background="image.gif" bgproperties="fixed">) into folder.htt with no success. I guess I could just use a diffinitive answer right about now as Im :x of searching

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/492407-explorer-folder-background-image/
Share on other sites

can you add a background like this? http://virtualplastic.net/html/wv_main.html#background

Yeah I can make a patterned background display through desktop.ini easily but I can't get a web view background to work, I cant even get web view to work. I've tried adding the registry key's and values that are recommended on virtualplastic, tried downloading their templates, ran webview installer, made the folder have system attributes, to no avail. Can anyone else throw me a suggestion?

did you try background wizard or ieshwiz.exe?

Yeah I tried ieshwiz, also downloaded the example desktop.ini from virtualplastic. Is XP SP2 incompatible with custom webviews? If not can someone show me an example of a fixed background desktop.ini /w folder.htt?

I got around the tiling issue by making the image roughly 2x larger than the visible area, so the tiling would be WAY off-screen.

So this image:

post-156510-1157786587.jpg

Would display like this:

post-156510-1157786616.jpg

Of course, the visible area will go off-screen as you start scrolling, and the only time you'll see the "display area" again will be when scrolling thru a window with hundreds of files, like Windows\system32. If you want your image to display more often, just reduce the tiling area.

Hope that helps. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      213
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!