Software pirate gets record sentence


Recommended Posts

A U.S. judge on Friday sentenced the owner and operator of iBackups.net to 87 months in prison, the longest sentence ever given for software piracy, according to a software trade group.

Nathan Peterson, of Antelope Acres, California, also forfeited nearly all of his assets to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Alexandria, and he agreed to pay more than US$5.4 million in restitution, the Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA) said. Peterson pleaded guilty to two counts of criminal copyright infringement in December.

At that time, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) called Backups.net "the largest for-profit software piracy site ever shut down by law enforcement." The Web site illegally sold software that would have been worth $20 million on the retail market, the DOJ said.

Peterson will begin paying off the remaining $5 million in damages 60 days after his release from prison, at a rate of $200 per month.

In criminal piracy cases, the average damages resulting from pirated software are just over $9 million, or less than half of the $20 million caused by iBackups, SIIA said. The $5.4 million Peterson agreed to pay in restitution is eight times the average fine of $659,000, according to a SIIA study tracking U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation cases on software piracy reported since 2000.

Peterson's site used Google.com text ads to find customers, SIIA said. Buyers should be aware of the possibility that software being sold through text ads might not be legal, the trade group said.

Neither the prosecutor nor Peterson's attorney immediately returned calls seeking comment.

Source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/494694-software-pirate-gets-record-sentence/
Share on other sites

87 months = 7.25 years

That's a longer sentence than some manslaughter sentences. So I guess it's worse to pirate software than to kill someone.

Ahhh you love that sense of the justice system to, do you? :pinch:

I don't understand how they can give him a longer sentence than a murderer. It was a victimless crime afterall, he didn't steal anything in the traditional sense he never took a tangible object from someone who would be without something he just made copies and no one got hurt.

I think they should have shut down his operation made him pay a huge fine and give him several years of community service instead.

Ahhh you love that sense of the justice system to, do you? :pinch:

Considering the justice system is run by the Government it is really not surprising to me. Corporations lose money to pirates and that follows Government losing tax revenue from corporations. A person who is man slaughtered, on the other hand, doesn't really affect the Government unless it starts to become an issue and people start voting against those in office.

This is also a bit of a "backlash" affect that happens often when laws that were not previously enforced are now enforceable. The backlash is due to the huge amount of piracy that has occurred since the ~mid-nintees. It has hit a point where governments world-wide need to address the problem, and the first wave of convictions are for "making an example" and literally scaring people away from committing the crime. Piracy is a real problem, and convictions like this will no doubt lower the amount of offenders.

Eventually the sentences will lower to a more reasonable level. Just like how people busted for marijuana possession aren't in as bad of a position as they were if they were busted with it in the mid-eightees at the height of the war on drugs in america.

I'm not against our government system. In fact (from a standpoint of theory here) I love it. It's the fairest and best system, imo, that we have developed to date. Thats just the theory side.

Here's the proble. Reality. People are not always moral, Especially politicians. :laugh: The system from a theory standpoint works good, and in reality compared to other systems of our time and in history it does work pretty decent, no great shake but pretty decent. It's the corrupt officials of the system that make it suck. :yes:

Hey corporations aren't losing money if you kill someone.

Well yes. But if you expect corporations to listen you need to speak their talk. AKA Greed.

You don't say this: It's really horrible to murder somebody, it should have heavier penalties then Piracy.

You say this: What if that person killed the next Bill Gates? Think of all the money you would lose. We MUST discourage these citizens from potentially costing us billions.

Then you get a response. :(

two counts got him 87 months ???

as said above worse then murder WTF?

thats and uppercut to the nuts with a spiked glove

Manslaughter is not the same as murder. Manslaughter isn't intended (i.e. running someone over with your car while fleeing police) whereas murder has malicious intent.

Anyways, 7.25 years isn't really that long, and they're trying to set examples.

Manslaughter is not the same as murder. Manslaughter isn't intended (i.e. running someone over with your car while fleeing police) whereas murder has malicious intent.

Anyways, 7.25 years isn't really that long, and they're trying to set examples.

Uh Yeah actually 7.25 years is a LONG time. Think about how different of a person you were that long ago. Where were you in life. What has changed in the last 7.25 years?

Yeah that is a long time, even longer in prison. :(

i would file an appeal. thats is a BS sentence if i have ever seen one. hell, a lady who dumped her childed in the dumpster and left it for dead only got 4 years. This government is crap, and i hope it dies horribly soon. sure he was doing something illegal, but he didnt hurt 1 person at all. there was no physical or mental damage being done to any one. i say give him half a year of jail, followed by all the money had made has to go back to some charity. 7 years is a loooong time. hell, im only 24, so that would be 1/3rd of my life. thats like missing my childhood, or teen years.

Manslaughter is not the same as murder. Manslaughter isn't intended (i.e. running someone over with your car while fleeing police) whereas murder has malicious intent.

Anyways, 7.25 years isn't really that long, and they're trying to set examples.

Thanks for posting this, I was going to clear up my point, as well. Manslaughter does not equal murder.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In some countries the law has forced Microsoft to display a menu on a fresh install of Windows which asks which web browser you want and it will install that browser. This doesn't add any bloat to Windows. It simply an additional step when setting up a new PC.
    • Chrome is also a first party browser on Android and ChromeOS. And on those systems, Google is pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft does on Windows.
    • Unofficial script lets you install unreleased Windows 11 features without Microsoft Account by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily evolving the Windows Insider Program over the years, introducing new channels and testing paths that allow enthusiasts to experience upcoming and yet-to-be-released Windows features (some interesting hidden ones too) before they reach the public. However, one long-standing requirement has remained largely unchanged as users are generally expected to enroll in the Program and with a Microsoft account. That's where a third-party tool called "OfflineInsiderEnroll" can help. OfflineInsiderEnroll is said to be a lightweight script that enables access to Windows Insider Program builds on systems that are not signed in with a Microsoft account. Essentially the tool configures the necessary Insider settings locally and hence allows users to select and switch between available preview channels while continuing to receive builds through the normal Windows Update channel. If you are wondering how it manages to do so, it is made possible by a Registry value known as TestFlags. When configured to"0x20", Windows stops communicating with Microsoft's online Insider enrollment services thus preventing locally configured Insider settings from being overwritten. This allows the script to apply its own channel configuration directly through the Registry as Windows Update does not verify whether a device has been officially enrolled in the Insider Program or not. Previously the utility has had already supported the traditional Insider branches including Dev, Beta, and Release Preview. However following Microsoft’s recent restructuring of its preview channels, the script has now been updated. The latest OfflineInsiderEnroll version, 2.6.6, adds support for the newly introduced Insider channel lineup. As such, users can now choose from several Experimental channels in addition to Beta and Release Preview options. The update also retains tools for refreshing the Insider cache, resetting Insider settings, and completely stopping Insider enrollment when needed. Keep in mind though that will need elevated privileges when running the script (run as Admin). You can get the latest version of OfflineInsiderEnroll from this page on its official GitHub repo.
    • The "Classic" Outlook has done that for a few years as well. The option to even change that is really hidden away too... It really shouldn't be hard to respect user defaults. Sadly we are the product now, not Outlook. To change in the Classic Outlook: File > Options > Advanced > change "Open hyperlinks from Outlook in"
    • Get yo ass to space
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!