First details of Office 2007 for Mac


Recommended Posts

Microsoft?s next-gen Office suite for the Mac is being given a top-to-toe refit in readiness for its debut in the third quarter of 2007.

On the surface is a revised interface which borrows ideas from the Office 2007 for Windows ?ribbon? and has already been radically changed due to user feedback. The new versions of Word, Excel and PowerPoint will all adopt the native XML file formats of their Windows siblings.

And, the program is of course being rebuilt as an Intel-friendly Universal Binary application.

As is convention for the Office family, at this early stage the product is known only by its version number as ?Office 12′. ?That won?t be the name it goes to market with ? we?ll have something brilliant, like the year it launches, as the name!? laughs Mary Starman, group product manager for Microsoft?s Macintosh Business Unit (MacBU).

?Typically we release about 6-8 months after Windows Office, and they?ve announced general availability in the January timeframe, so we would be 6-8 months after that.? If her timetable holds firm, the program that will likely be christened as ?Office 2007′ will touch down between July and September of 2007 ? around three and a half years since the arrival of Office 2004 in March of that year.

Microsoft?s 130-odd Mac developers have already reached the halfway mark in their marathon march, Last month, they completed the transition to Apple?s Xcode, which forms the basis for the Universal binaries that are compatible with new Intel-based Macs as well as older PowerPC machines.

?This was a huge milestone for us? Starman says with equal parts pride and relief. ?We had to move from the CodeWare compiler, we were dealing with millions of lines of code and we still had old code that was written in Assembly, so it?s been a long process to switch everything over and for our developers to learn the new tools. Everyone has been working very hard on the transition, it?s been literally all hands on deck?.

Being able to sidestep the Rosetta translation layer which enables Power PC applications to run under the Intel architecture should in itself deliver a significant speed boost to Office 12. ?We haven?t been able to do any benchmark tests because we?re not at code complete, so it?s pretty hard to do performance tuning yet, but it should end up being quite a bit faster? Starman predicts.

The next milestone in the road to Office 12 will be when the new UI and features are finally baked into the suite and it?s declared ?code complete?, which Starman says is ?normally about six months before release?.

While Office 12 will likely see three major beta releases there are currently no plans for a widespread public beta program as has been done with Office 2007 for Windows.

?Being such a small group we tend to do a smaller beta program with just a handful of corporate customers around the world. We?ll usually refresh the build they have about three times, but it?s not likely for this release that we?ll do a broad public beta where everyone can go and muck around.?

Of course, Mac users are already having their say about the next version of Office. ?We get a lot of people asking ?Are you going to do that ribbon thing??? says Starman, in relation to the innovative yet controversial ribbon interface of Office 2007 for Windows, which was aimed at removing the reliance on deeply-nested menus and making existing features more ?discoverable?.

?We will be doing a UI refresh? Starman confirms, ?but it won?t be exactly like you see in Office 2007. It just wouldn?t make sense. Apple has got their own very specific set of user interface guidelines and we try to first and foremost to follow those guidelines. If we can innovate on top of that and do some interesting things to make sure that the interface is really discoverable for the Mac user, then we?ll look at doing that. We can get some ideas (from the ribbon) but it still has to fit within Apple?s UI guideline, that?s what a Mac user wants to see? Starman says.

?There?s also a lot of speculation in the Apple developer community about the UI changes that will come in Leopard, too, and what are we all going to have do when we see those changes.?

Design and usability testing on the Office 12 interface is already underway in the MacBU labs at Redmond and Cupertino, and the team has already made one trip back to the drawing board based on user feedback.

?We have usability experts and usability labs at both of our campuses, and we?re spending a lot of time bringing people through for each iteration of the UI. That?s part of why it?s changing so much right now? explains Starman.

?We had what we thought was going to be this perfect UI solution, and the first time we put it in the labs, no-one understood it! It was so different they were completely confused! We just finished up another round of usability testing on the new UI yesterday, and the program manager said the difference is like night and day?.

Perhaps the most vital issue for any version of Office is compatibility with previous editions. This holds doubly true on the Mac platform, where people sharing files with Windows users expect total fidelity in formatting, formula and other document deal-breakers.

?One of the big things we?re working on for the next version of Office is picking up the new XML file formats of Office 2007 for windows? says Starman. ?As (the Office for Windows team) get through chunks we port things over, but we won?t be able to do our final testing on file formats and compatibility until they release office 2007″ she offers to account in part for the long wait to the next Mac release of Office.

However, the Mac team isn?t concerned that the ability of Intel-based Macs to run Windows, and thus the Windows version of Office, might eat into their market. ?Mac customers would prefer to run a native version of Office on their Mac? says Sheridan Jones, Lead Marketing Manager for the MacBU ?We don?t expect and I don?t think Apple expects lots of their customers and our customers to be running the Windows version of Office on their Mac.?

?But BootCamp and Parallels open up a lot of opportunities for people to run some of the applications that we?re not able to port over, if they need Access or Project for example.?

Source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/496673-first-details-of-office-2007-for-mac/
Share on other sites

Great news. :) I'm glad they're doing a UI refresh - I don't really like the 2004 UI. It would also be nice if they could integrate all the toolbars and palettes together, so we don't have several extra little windows floating around the desktop.

It would also be nice if they could integrate all the toolbars and palettes together, so we don't have several extra little windows floating around the desktop.

That's what the 'ribbon' is for (Y)

Microsoft?s next-gen Office suite for the Mac is being given a top-to-toe refit in readiness for its debut in the third quarter of 2007.

On the surface is a revised interface which borrows ideas from the Office 2007 for Windows ?ribbon? and has already been radically changed due to user feedback. The new versions of Word, Excel and PowerPoint will all adopt the native XML file formats of their Windows siblings.

And, the program is of course being rebuilt as an Intel-friendly Universal Binary application.

souricon.gifhttp://www.apcstart.com/site/dflynn/2006/0...-mac-all-new-ui

Yup when I heard about this I was jumping for joy. Unfortunately I read about the expected release date and so I proceeded to shed a little tear.

I understand their reasoning but that just means I won't be able to use a Universal binary of Word (and any Word document in the new format from Windows) on my Mac until about a month into the next year of school. It's a shame, but what can ya do.

Other than that, I'm looking forward to this. I have this odd feeling that the Mac division at Microsoft has a sly and sarcastic dislike towards the Windows division. ;)

i was hoping for a bit sooner than July since i will be done school by then....i guess i wont really get a chance to use it

Yeah the expect ETA of the next Microsoft Office version is a bit disappointing. I wonder how the new interface will turn out.

i sure hope they'll find a way to integrate it nicely to the osx interface

i was hoping for a bit sooner than July since i will be done school by then....i guess i wont really get a chance to use it

i sure hope they'll find a way to integrate it nicely to the osx interface

Hopefully it will match Mac OS X Leopard's Aqua interface instead of the one used by Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger or 10.3 Panther. ;)

I can't wait for this. It could be the thing to finally push me over the edge and make me buy a Macbook. A UI redesign would be really nice, I really like the ribbon, and any attempt they make at porting it to Os X should be a good one. What they talk about here seems like some pretty innovative stuff.

Off-topic: Radish™, that has to be one of the best sigs I've seen in a while.

1 year from now...

Microsoft Office 2007, formerly known as Office 12 in the initial stages of its beta cycle, is scheduled to be released in November 2006 for volume licensing customers and in the beginning of 2007 in retail.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft%20Office%202007

Topic title: Office 2007 for Mac. ;)

“Typically we release about 6-8 months after Windows Office, and they’ve announced general availability in the January timeframe, so we would be 6-8 months after that.” If her timetable holds firm, the program that will likely be christened as ‘Office 2007′ will touch down between July and September of 2007 — around three and a half years since the arrival of Office 2004 in March of that year.

It'd be interesting to see how the UI turns out. How would the OS X menu bar factor into the applications... or will the menus be turned into menu-like ribbons?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!