AMD Preparing for Nov. '4x4' Launch


Recommended Posts

The Taiwanese electronics industry daily DigiTimes is citing motherboard manufacturers there as saying they're gearing up now for production of new models that will support three new AMD premium processors.

The new FX-70, -72, and -74 models, DigiTimes was told, will effectively launch AMD's new premium platform, currently code-named '4x4.' Motherboards supporting this platform will be unique because they'll feature two CPU sockets, not just one, with each Socket 1207 designed to support dual-core CPUs.

This is a connector design generally used for Opterons rather than Athlons, so manufacturers are warning this could drive the price of premium systems up even further.

But the very introduction could drive current FX-series processor prices, such as those for the FX-62 and FX-60, down, enabling AMD to argue they're more price competitive than comparable Intel models. A mid-November launch for '4x4' would be right in time with Intel's anticipated introduction of its first consumer-grade quad-core processor, the Core 2 Extreme QX6700.

AMD will have a difficult, though not impossible, case to make for its architectural strategy. A key design decision several years ago regarding its so-called crossbar connection enabled the company to adopt dual-processor/dual-core architecture today without having to radically change its fabrication processes.

Meanwhile, Intel is readying four cores on one die, and not with 90 nm lithography like AMD, but with 65 nm, reportedly with lower power consumption. Come November, AMD may have to prove its mettle with both high performance and compelling value.

AMD declined to comment on the report.

Source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/499108-amd-preparing-for-nov-4x4-launch/
Share on other sites

it's so hard to decide.. i just read intels new 80-core processor in 5 years, and they already have a prototype. i thought for sure, my next computer will be an intel, 4 core, but 2 dual-core processors are better then 1 with 4 cores. but 1 processor is cheaper then 2 :/

i guess something new will be out in 2 years that will cost even more, and be twice as good :)

AMD 4x4 means a motherboard with dual socket for 2 DualCore CPU??

A motherboard like that is likely to cost more than a single socket board? And with Intel pushing out QuadCore into 1 CPU.... What is to gain with AMD 4x4 ??

Another thing... 4x4 means : 4 core by 4 what?? Quad SLI? How much a PC like that is going to cost?

If AMD 4x4 is two dualcore CPUs, and Intel's Quadro is 4 cores in 1 CPU, how is AMD 4x4 better, as some people contend?

4x4 isn't quad core, it's two CPUs linked by HyperTransport!

Core 2 Quad = 2 Core 2 Duo on same chip. It's not a full Quadcore itself. By this way, the two dual cores die are linked by the FSB...

725_kentsfield.jpg

The most bigest reason why Intel still winner, the Core 2 Quadro should work on all high-end Core 2 Duo compatible board and even some mid-range i965P chipset. AMD will use overcosly dual Socket F (1207 Pins) boards. So at the end of the story, AMD is back at the era of the Sockets 754 and 940 when Flagship CPU and servers CPU was togeter and the rest on another socket. This is stupid, how do you think will feel all people that had buy the best mobos like DFI LanParty UT NF590-SLI-M2R or ASUS Crosshair when they will learn that thier top level mobo can't support higher than the FX 64?

This mean that the AM2 will NEVER beat the Core2Extreme X6800 :p

The most bigest reason why Intel still winner, the Core 2 Quadro should work on all high-end Core 2 Duo compatible board and even some mid-range i965P chipset. AMD will use overcosly dual Socket F (1207 Pins) boards. So at the end of the story, AMD is back at the era of the Sockets 754 and 940 when Flagship CPU and servers CPU was togeter and the rest on another socket. This is stupid, how do you think will feel all people that had buy the best mobos like DFI LanParty UT NF590-SLI-M2R or ASUS Crosshair when they will learn that thier top level mobo can't support higher than the FX 64?

This mean that the AM2 will NEVER beat the Core2Extreme X6800 :p

Surely a one-chip solution is cheaper to run than a two-chip solution, regardless of socket!

Two-chip solutions will require two HSFs while a one chip solution only requires one. Two sockets take up more space on the board, and introduce more circuitry.

AMD is really going nowhere fast. They'll putting out their blabber and bull... and promoting it as "lower power consumption" by comparing their 4x4 to the Paxville.

Guys, AMD 4x4 is a stop-gap solution to make sure that Intel doesn't completely rape them this winter. It's not MEANT to be upgraded to. Just go buy yourself an AM2 based system and wait for AM2/AM3 socketed native-Quad core chips, ok?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      262
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      86
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!