AOL Testing 'Light' Version of AIM


Recommended Posts

blah.. its a good start but when I think of a light client I want the following only

  • Clean buddy list like ET has
  • Profiles, simple text and link only ones
  • smilie faces!
  • Ability to color text forground/background, and change my font
  • ability to view a profile like old AIM 4 had
  • Direct connect (IMAGE MESSAGEING ONLY! NOTHING ELSE)
  • Drop the themes! you want a real lite client? dont spend resources on a theme, let windows do the themeing, then at least it will match the OS

that's all I really need

this is a step in the right direction for us that hate AIM 6 though

  • 2 weeks later...

Just found this today and I'm very impressed, not everyone is hyped up about the theme but that's the last thing I worry about in an IM client. I've been using AIMExpress for years do the to the fact that all the AIM client's that I've used are always filles with ridiculous features that i'll never use. This is the only lite AIM client that actually uses the OSCAR protocol without problems.

I honestly can't think of any complaints, except one, and that's the native windows theme. Other than that this is great.

Wow, this is really nice.

It looks awesome, the simple animations make it look even better, it works awesome, and it has almost all the features that I would need in an AIM client. The only thing that I think it realy needs is buddy icon support and profile viewing.

I don't really care about memory usage regarding the theme, since 10MB isn't going to make much of a difference on the 2GB that I have.

lite2ua1.jpg

Just found this today and I'm very impressed, not everyone is hyped up about the theme but that's the last thing I worry about in an IM client. I've been using AIMExpress for years do the to the fact that all the AIM client's that I've used are always filles with ridiculous features that i'll never use. This is the only lite AIM client that actually uses the OSCAR protocol without problems.

I honestly can't think of any complaints, except one, and that's the native windows theme. Other than that this is great.

I agree. I think it's a great idea for the ones that wants a LIGHT AIM client. Everyone seems to think it's "too light". :huh: I think it will be just right if they throw in some of the basic emotions like :) :( :p :s :o .

What I hear it will get better. ;)

EDIT: They have released version 0.30.

We've just released Laim 0.30. As you'd expect we've added some of the more basic features, like:

-- Buddy List? management (yay!)

-- Friendly names

-- Basic custom away messages

-- Auto-hyperlinking

-- Filtering

-- Same minimalist design and low memory usage (improvements here and there)!

If you peek around you might find some really neat features we've snuck in.

Download from the official AIM Lite site.

Screen Shots:

lite1dc9.jpglite2ua1.jpg

Edited by MchWalte
It is extremely nice. This is wonderful.
I agree. I like AIM 6 as much as the next guy, but it's nice to have a light app running on your notebook or something similar.
I hate apps that are java based.
I wasn't aware that this was Java based.

I switched from AIM 5.5 w/ deadaim. The new features included:

Minimalistic interface

Aliases

Logging

Cloning

File Transfer Manager (Replaces Direct Connect)

are enough for me. No crazy fonts. No need to resize the IM window for obsessively large images sent throught DC. No stupid custom simlie faces. No BS text filling up the context menus.

It's a cleaner product overall. I can say that this is my new favorite messaging client, and it's from AOL!. I can't see any other aspect for which this client can be improved on, except for the ability to view profiles.

aim_light.jpg

It's still java based. There's other folders in there as well. Code in another folder is for the black theme. The xprt5.dll & xprt6.dll along with the coolcore46.dll have code in them that interpret java code.

Wrong thread? :rolleyes:

You might want to :rolleyes: at yourself there buddy. I merely stated that I don't like apps that are java based. This is certainly one of them.

Edited by MrCobra

aim_light.jpg

It's still java based. There's other folders in there as well. Code in another folder is for the black theme. The xprt5.dll & xprt6.dll along with the coolcore46.dll have code in them that interpret java code.

You might want to :rolleyes: at yourself there buddy. I merely stated that I don't like apps that are java based. This is certainly one of them.

erm :rolleyes:

i see some javaSCRIPT files but certainly no java

i think i'm entitled to another :rolleyes:

I like where this thing is going, all I need is profiles (simple black and white text only is fine).

We are continuing to work on building the AIM Lite experience. We take the feedback we get from you guys, and figure out how to implemented it without adding any significant hit to perf. Profiles for example require almost zero thought wrt perf. I think we have hit upon something really good here with AIM Lite, there are some hidden features in the client that are not "turned on" yet. Enjoy using it and as always keep the great feedback coming.

We are continuing to work on building the AIM Lite experience. We take the feedback we get from you guys, and figure out how to implemented it without adding any significant hit to perf. Profiles for example require almost zero thought wrt perf. I think we have hit upon something really good here with AIM Lite, there are some hidden features in the client that are not "turned on" yet. Enjoy using it and as always keep the great feedback coming.
This is one of the best products I've used in a long time. If AOL keeps going in this direction it'll be a complete turn around, customers may even come back =P.

On a serious note, The only things I'd like to see is a basic profile entry(black and white works perfectly), and native windows theming. I do however like the style of the theme now but it wouldn't hurt to have that option avaliable. You guys are doing godlike work with this. :cool:

Right now this is a very early product that only a small handful of developers are working on, some on their free time because they work on other projects. For sure, there are some essential features missing - profile support, sending typing indications (right now you can only see them), and better UI. Sounds are coming - but probably as a plug-in. AIM Lite is written on a new UI platform called Boxely, something which we released very recently (http://www.boxely.com). I have a small write up of AIM lite on my blog here:

http://algorizms.blogspot.com/2006/10/7-re...ck-out-aim.html

@MrCobra

AIM Lite is not Java based. Boxely uses a javascript back end, but as you know, JavaScript is not Java or even related to it.

Right now this is a very early product that only a small handful of developers are working on, some on their free time because they work on other projects. For sure, there are some essential features missing - profile support, sending typing indications (right now you can only see them), and better UI. Sounds are coming - but probably as a plug-in. AIM Lite is written on a new UI platform called Boxely, something which we released very recently (http://www.boxely.com). I have a small write up of AIM lite on my blog here:

http://algorizms.blogspot.com/2006/10/7-re...ck-out-aim.html

@MrCobra

AIM Lite is not Java based. Boxely uses a javascript back end, but as you know, JavaScript is not Java or even related to it.

Ah Rizwan Sattar to the rescue. :woot: The guy behind Boxely. Nice to see you here! Thanks for clearing up the Java issue. ;)

PS. Love your blog.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      262
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      86
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!