Neowin.net Xbox Community Leaderboards


Recommended Posts

I agree with Rookas, COD4 was much better than COD WAW.

Congrats Ji@nBing on Verteran. It was a joke in some places as your men only advanced upwards if you did so you were left with respawning enemies over and over again.

there's quite a lot of aimboting and wallhacking going on in COD4 on the 360, but by no means is that the majority of people. the less said about it the better - you don't want to dignify those juvenile idiots.

No there isn't, stop talking rubbish and learn to play the game properly. People can exploit a few selected map glitches but there is no way in hell you will be able to "wallhack" or use "aimbot" beside the weak aim-assist in the game. Proper use of sound and actually knowing how to aim is the key.

No there isn't, stop talking rubbish and learn to play the game properly. People can exploit a few selected map glitches but there is no way in hell you will be able to "wallhack" or use "aimbot" beside the weak aim-assist in the game. Proper use of sound and actually knowing how to aim is the key.

Google it. There actually ARE cheats for COD4 on 360. It's a modified ISO and you have to have a modded 360 to play it. I can see these people getting banned in the next ban wave though as obviously the ISO wouldn't be an exact copy of the original and MS should be able to detect it.

ignore him, he's trying to pick a fight. he's too young to realize the ramifications of what happens when someone decides to give it to you. at the end of the day, he always ends up quoting me - not the other way around.

as for WaW, i prefer the single player campaign - it was longer and had more variety to it. the game overall, including the MP, was also more mature - i like the fact it's the first COD to have the F word in it. But yes, overall COD4 is much more addictive and compelling.

hats off to you for doing that, on veteran those games are just silly hard. by the 100th grenade tossed my way, which was like five minutes into the campaign, i was "**** it".

True, theres also something else that ****es me off. Since CoD 2 (possibly since CoD 1 but i havent played that one) there are some parts in the games where if you dont move beyond a certain point the enemies just keep coming and coming indefinitely... it's so unrealistic and stupid.

Google it. There actually ARE cheats for COD4 on 360. It's a modified ISO and you have to have a modded 360 to play it. I can see these people getting banned in the next ban wave though as obviously the ISO wouldn't be an exact copy of the original and MS should be able to detect it.

I did and found nothing. I'm really interested in seeing a proper source for this because I have never heard or seen anything on this subject. I played Call of Duty 4 for a long time on the 360 and never, ever met a single cheater using aimbots, wallhacks or anything of that sort. Even that supposed "cheat" that lets you carry over the single-player unlockable cheats and use them in multiplayer, never seen that either, haven't even heard any of my friends report seeing it.

The people that complain about cheats are usually terrible at the game and fail to grasp the concept of 'skills', if you'd like to call it that.

EDIT: Some more goggling reveals posts like these on people wanting to try out a "Modified ISO" online;

modding the iso means you NEED to know the public and private RSA keys to even resign the map and thats if your doing a simple iso mod

if your going to mod the game off the hdd than you also need to know the PRIS/live keys to sign the con its in which no one knows

thus making your theory impossible

ignore him, he's trying to pick a fight. he's too young to realize the ramifications of what happens when someone decides to give it to you. at the end of the day, he always ends up quoting me - not the other way around.

"neoadorable", would you please stop acting so butthurt every time someone snaps you back to reality. You always talk about how young people are or how immature they are, yet you are the one that acts like a 5 year old.

There actually aren't infinite spawns in WAW, just a whole crapload of them. What I would do is move up to trigger the next spawn, then hang back a little bit and keep picking guys off with a rifle until they finally stop re-spawning. Then move up and take out the remaining guys with a machine gun while tossing back/dodging grenades. Repeat. Usually there is a specific route or piece of cover you have to use too, so it takes a lot of trial and error.

"sethos", i'm not passive-aggressive like you, if you want to go at it with me, i'll be happy to oblige - and not just on the forum if that's your thing. but to give you a quick life lesson, it's always "sethos" going out of its way to respond to my posts. never the other way around. someone's infatuated.

"sethos", i'm not passive-aggressive like you, if you want to go at it with me, i'll be happy to oblige - and not just on the forum if that's your thing. but to give you a quick life lesson, it's always "sethos" going out of its way to respond to my posts. never the other way around. someone's infatuated.

Lawl ok.

Now go practice some Call of Duty 4 ;)

it's not that important to me to be good, i'm not 17 - hopefully you make it to 18. at my age one's used to losing much more than a team deathmatch map. besides, i don't mind admitting that i do have my good games on COD4. why just yesterday on good old Bog with a couple of AH-64's and an air strike i ended up 30:9. first time i broke 30. of course the next map i was 8:12 or something like that. just goes to show you, in this life, you never know! oh what am i saying, forgot to take my pills again.

EDIT: sorry, guess "sethos" is 21 now. real aged. but since "sethos" came into this discussion with no other purpose than to cause trouble, and since "sethos" is such an accomplished, skilled gamer, maybe "sethos" can turn off privacy settings on that gamertag so the rest of us can take notes and improve so we don't have to whine about cheating. see, i really don't have anything better to do. thank goodness for the global recession.

Edited by neoadorable

you can say that again - some of the downloadable stuff is almost full price now but still only 20% of the gamerscore potential...well maybe that's an exaggeration, but still, it's probably time to go up to 500 GS for stuff like Shadow Complex and Battlefield 1943.

Got Mirror's Edge for $15 today. It's pretty cool. No more new games for a bit now though (I think/hope :p ). I still have Red Faction, Banjo, Dead Space, and Price of Persia (if I decide I ever want to play that game again, grrrr!!) that I need to finish before buying anymore new games.

I've got a bunch of stuff to play, but I just haven't had time. When I do have time to play I just feel like shooting people, so CoD is about all I've played for a while. I did get BF1943 but I'm not crazy about it, but it's decent for a $15 game. Once I missed my target of 50K by July I just stopped caring about my GS. Between 60 hours of work a week and the gf my gaming time is very very low. I'll have to do something soon or I'll drop out of the top 10, if I haven't already, need to check.

looks like mygc has gone haywire again.

rookas, sorry you missed your GS deadline, but there's always August. I hope to be at 45K by the end of the summer myself. of course COD4 is addictive, robbing us of much needed scoring time. but that's them shakes.

looks like mygc has gone haywire again.

rookas, sorry you missed your GS deadline, but there's always August. I hope to be at 45K by the end of the summer myself. of course COD4 is addictive, robbing us of much needed scoring time. but that's them shakes.

Yeah, COD4 needs to give out achievement points for every few hours played. It's a GS robber!! I've managed to resist it the past few weeks though. I've got too many games to catch up on.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!