Recommended Posts

QFT!

T3 was pretty poor imo.

T3 was a great summer action movie but it can't be compared to J. Cameron's previous 2. Those 2 were the best action movie of it's time. 3 had a lot of explosions & action but it was missing Cameron's magic & Brad Fiedel's magnificent score.

BTW T4 is on the works for 2008.

Edited by Lqv2015
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/502124-terminator-2/#findComment-587950440
Share on other sites

after watching, T2 and T3, I went back to T1.. and I didn't really see the connection of why AHHHHnold is trying to kill Sarah Conner and then suddenly in T2 helping them. I assume that John Conner in the future somehow programmed AHHHHHnold in the future before coming to the past. and so that is why Skynet has sent a new generation in T2 and T3.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/502124-terminator-2/#findComment-587951444
Share on other sites

i have to agree, T2 is one of my favourite movies. i just love at the end when sarah conner (aka the T1000 as sarah conner) calling john. just the way she says it is great....i quote it sometimes for some random reasons. my brother does the same. lol.

"John!..." damn text, can't make it sound right. hehe.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/502124-terminator-2/#findComment-587951686
Share on other sites

after watching, T2 and T3, I went back to T1.. and I didn't really see the connection of why AHHHHnold is trying to kill Sarah Conner and then suddenly in T2 helping them. I assume that John Conner in the future somehow programmed AHHHHHnold in the future before coming to the past. and so that is why Skynet has sent a new generation in T2 and T3.

Every "arnold" terminator (T-101) is different. The "arnold"s in the first and the second movie were two diferrent machines from the future, they just look alike that's all.

In the first movie Skynet sent a T-101 model back to the past to eliminate Sarah Connor so that she doesnt give birth to future resistance leader John Connor.

And in T2, The FUTURE John Connor reprogrammed a T-101 and sent it back to present day to protect the PRESENT John Connor from the advanced T-1000 Liquid Metal model sent by Skynet.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/502124-terminator-2/#findComment-587952045
Share on other sites

Every "arnold" terminator (T-101) is different. The "arnold"s in the first and the second movie were two diferrent machines from the future, they just look alike that's all.

In the first movie Skynet sent a T-101 model back to the past to eliminate Sarah Connor so that she doesnt give birth to future resistance leader John Connor.

And in T2, The FUTURE John Connor reprogrammed a T-101 and sent it back to present day to protect the PRESENT John Connor from the advanced T-1000 Liquid Metal model sent by Skynet.

hmmm so I was right.. it makes me wonder why the Future John Conner didn't reprogram the T-1000 for T3.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/502124-terminator-2/#findComment-587952346
Share on other sites

hmmm so I was right.. it makes me wonder why the Future John Conner didn't reprogram the T-1000 for T3.

Well I'm not so into the details of the plot, but I would say it was because Future John only managed to get hold of the older and less advanced T-101 model. The newer models T-1000 (T2) and T-X (T3) were probably harder to get hold of/reprogram, and anyway the T-101 proved on two ocassions that old is still gold. :D

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/502124-terminator-2/#findComment-587954784
Share on other sites

T2 is defiantly one of the best action movies I've seen, its just a generally great movie, defiantly was the height of arnys movie career, lol

and i love the whole time paradox that the movies create, great fun trying to explain them to peoples.

Ive never seen T3 though, I've heard lots of people say it wasn't that good though.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/502124-terminator-2/#findComment-587958170
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!