List Your Overclocks..

[Nissel]

my toaster is overclocked.. burns bread twice as fast..

[Caspar]

Well here?s my OC. Please check sig for details...

My cpu normally idles at 26-28C, thank god for watercooling.

[Sandor]

hardly, you appear to be blind or stupid or both...

why?

hes on a superior processor and higher speeds

[Samoa]

hardly, you appear to be blind or stupid or both...

why?

hes on a superior processor and higher speeds

585396047[/snapback]

:pinch: I was wrong. his is better....my mistake....oh well, life goes on... :blush:

Edited February 1, 2005 by Samoa

[Chaoserver]

2.73ghz, hopefully 2.8 or 2.9 whenever I get a new power supply :)

[blik]

who is on a superior processor to whom? with higher speeds?

if you are referring to the s939 3000 to my s754 3000, you better think again. Sisoft is clearly showing mine killing his. :p

585396210[/snapback]

Drop your memory to my speed and you'll see I'm neither stupid or blind. My RAM is the only thing keeping my MIPS score lower... And as for "killing" mine, I think you are blind, can you see my MFLOPS?

[Cyrilix]

3000+ Amd64 (S754) @ 2.5ghz 500FSB, 1000HTT (Y)

Kicks the 939 versions ass  :yes: why spend more money for less performance?  :p

585392670[/snapback]

Doesn't kick 939 ass at all...you got a decent overclock, but I've seen tons and tons of Winchesters that have done better.

[Neolink]

[j.r.l.]

Its really an Athlon 2400+... It thinks its a 2700 because of the MHz. I get good benchmarks (better then Athlon 3200+ s!). I managed to do this on 1:1 on PC2100 ram. Its all stable.

Nice overclock for a 2400+ tbred

Very nice temps. Ambiant temp is 31?C (heater is on) CPU runs at 34? when ambiant temp is normal.

[j.r.l.]

OK, I managed to reach as high as 154FSB (~2076GHz) on PC2100 but I was recommended to take it back to 148MHz... I could reach higher with my PC2100 ram (I know its insane) but this is where I'm stopping, until I can afford some better ram (and a mobile athlon 2600+)

[Samoa]

3000amd64 (s754) @ 2.6ghz 520FSB, 1040HTT, 1.67v, 2.8vdimm, 2.5-3-3-7

[Jackalope]

3000amd64 (s754) @ 2.6ghz 520FSB, 1040HTT, 1.67v, 2.8vdimm, 2.5-3-3-7

585436635[/snapback]

Simple system, but runs like a dream ... haven't had a lick of problems with anything, and haven't even tried any new cooling options. The SuperTalent memory is reasonably priced, and runs neck in neck with Kingston's best on the benchmarks. May try for something a little faster, but am pretty damn satisfied at the moment. Am thinking about building another system, and running with the new nVidia 4 chipsets and a PCI slot, but with the AGP version of the 6600GT running like it is, well ... :whistle:

[Samoa]

Simple system, but runs like a dream ... haven't had a lick of problems with anything, and haven't even tried any new cooling options.  The SuperTalent memory is reasonably priced, and runs neck in neck with Kingston's best on the benchmarks.  May try for something a little faster, but am pretty damn satisfied at the moment.  Am thinking about building another system, and running with the new nVidia 4 chipsets and a PCI slot, but with the AGP version of the 6600GT running like it is, well ... :whistle:

585438153[/snapback]

probably serves you well then...(Y)

[spikey_richie]

AMD 64 754 3000+ running at 2.3 (up from 2.009) just by increasing FSB from 200mhz to 233mhz. No voltage changes or multiplier changes.

[Samoa]

AMD 64 754 3000+ running at 2.3 (up from 2.009) just by increasing FSB from 200mhz to 233mhz. No voltage changes or multiplier changes.

585440063[/snapback]

It's really dependant on your system. Likely due to all the stuff I have hooked up, it requires more vcore to do well. But 1.45 to 1.67 isn't a lot to acheive 600mhz, 120FSB OC. :cool:

[xxdesmus]

;) stock cooling

[darkhooda]

Just a note, different versions of Sisoft Sandra have different benchmarking. On that version seen used by Samoa and Jackalope (probably 2004), the things are higher.

Edited February 10, 2005 by darkhooda

[Samoa]

Just a note, different versions of Sisoft Sandra have different benchmarking. On that version seen used by Samoa and Jackalope (probably 2004), the things are higher.

585443238[/snapback]

Gee just single me out... :p

FYI, 2004 runs 32bit tests higher than 2005 version. 2004 runs 64bit lower than 2005. So there is some discrepancy in the scoring yes. Is that my fault? no. Are my benchmarks note worthy, yes. Should you care, probably not. To me, it's about measuring how well your own system compares to things you do to it. It's nice to have a guide, basic comparisons of other types and similar sytems.

[Visentinel]

Had another session with my Overclocks

Everytime i tried to pass 2.65ghz my bios would clear itself >_< !!!

and the extra voltage to hit 2.65 wasnt worth it =\

My winchester mustn have very good stepping coz i need 1.5vcore to use 2.5ghz, 1.45 works fine but i get pops in winamp.. infact i get artifacts in games and errors in anything that uses Floating point.

[IK47]

*Latest as of Feb 11th

9800XT stock

454.50 / 384.75

completely stable

Idles at 58 degrees , works at 64 degrees

[Samoa]

Had another session with my Overclocks

Everytime i tried to pass 2.65ghz my bios would clear itself >_< !!!

and the extra voltage to hit 2.65 wasnt worth it =\

My winchester mustn have very good stepping coz i need 1.5vcore to use 2.5ghz, 1.45 works fine but i get pops in winamp.. infact i get artifacts in games and errors in anything that uses Floating point.

585449063[/snapback]

mine can do 2.5ghz @ 1.55ghz, 2.6ghz @ 1.65v

[whitedragon]

My locked Barton 2800+ can do 2.311 GHz.

[Visentinel]

This is the best my Winchester can do -_-

Really dissapointed, some peoples winchesters can reach 2.8ghz with this kind of Vcore >_>

500mhz oc and this kind of performance is still something to dance about lol :D

There was a time i was happy about having PC2700... i so need money, really must have ddr550.. and a 6800gt ..

Benchmarks and passes Super PI

I could boot and play with 2.6ghz with 1.65 but can u pass super PI ?

Its all about passing Super PI Samoa.. if it doesnt, you have errors in your chip, those errors may never cuase u problems, but its just better if those errors arent there. In my case trying to pass 2.65ghz can cuase so many errors my bios cant complete a CMOS burn and when my pc goes to POST it CMOS checksum Invalid.

Edited February 11, 2005 by Visentinel

[neocyber_16]

Just got an XPM2500 running at 12X200

[Samoa]

:rolleyes:

:sleep:

For all those interested in the difference WindowsXP x64 edition makes....