AllofMP3 Fights Critics, Loses Visa


Recommended Posts

After months of being criticized both in the press and among music industry executives, Russian music service AllofMP3.com shot back Tuesday, saying its business is legitimate. It charged that it has attempted to compensate the record industry, but has been turned down.

AllofMP3's owner Mediaservices pays the Russian Multimedia and Internet Society a 15 percent cut of its sales, it claims. RMIS has attempted to pay the record companies the royalties, but the record companies have refused to take the money.

The record industry maintains that the licensing group has no right to collect or distribute royalties. However, AllofMP3 counters that by paying the group, the site operates within Russian laws. Typically, song downloads cost just pennies per track with full albums retailing for as little as $1 or less.

A slew of record industry organizations including the RIAA and IFPI claim that AllofMP3 is making millions by ripping off artists and consumers, who believe they are purchasing their music legitimately. Authorized services such as Apple's iTunes and Real Rhapsody charge at least 10 times as much for music downloads.

To fight these claims, Mediaservices held a press conference in Washington, D.C. Wednesday to publicly refute claims of piracy. Company Director Vadim Mamotin told reporters through a translator that "nothing could be further from the truth" when its critics call it a bastion for piracy.

Additionally, Mamotin rebuffed claims that his site is preventing Russia's entry into the World Trade Organization, although the U.S. Government has specifically fingered AllofMP3 as one of the reasons to hold up the country's entry into the trade body.

What still remains unclear is AllofMP3's profits or royalty payments. Officials refused to disclose that information at the press conference.

In related news, Visa said Wednesday that it was stripping AllofMP3 of the ability to take Visa credit cards. The company said its move was to comply with recent Russian legislation and international copyright law.

Source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/504544-allofmp3-fights-critics-loses-visa/
Share on other sites

Update: They're now planning on giving away free music and make money off advertising.

The AllofMP3.com soap opera takes another bizarre twist today with news that the site plans on giving its music away for free and supporting itself through advertising?just as Visa announces its intention to stop processing AllofMP3 payments.

The ad-supported model is exactly the sort of intriguing new initiative that one might announce in one's first-ever press conference, but AllofMP3 said nothing about it. Odd?but the company is still new at this, finally deciding to mount a public defense of its activities after years of attacks from the IFPI and (more recently) the US Trade Representative.

Rory Davenport of Qorvis Communications, who is now handling public relations for AllofMP3, tells Ars that the site's operators have been considering the ad idea for several weeks. The plan would be to offer two services: the current model in which people pay for access to non-DRMed songs, and a second model, where the songs would be free, but would come with DRM that would force consumers to view advertising. All of this would happen within a proprietary player, so burning to CD or syncing to a digital music player are both out of the question.

That plan looked a lot more important yesterday after the International Herald Tribune reported that Visa had finally pulled the plug on AllofMP3 and would not process any more payments from the site. Davenport was unable to confirm to Ars that this had in fact happened.

If true, it could be a death blow to the site. While the ad-supported model might attract some users, most are unlikely to be swayed by DRMed music that can't be moved to an iPod.

The timing of the move was interesting; AllofMP3 has been in business for years, but only had their credit card processing revoked the day that they held their first press conference. Neither Visa nor the IFPI responded to our inquiries by press time, but one certainly wonders whether the IFPI, with no luck petitioning the Russian government, finally found another way to create problems for AllofMP3.

The site still claims to accept credit cards, but we'll see how long this message lasts.

Source

If you want to use a Visa to buy through them, simply use the pre-paid iCard Click & Buy thing. :D

This is a smart move by allofmp3, though I'm not sure people will appreciate the DRM now. Then again, I don't mind one bit, DRM or not.

I don't like DRM, but I'll still be a fan of allofmp3.com

They are the only music sales place that is smart enough to offer many different encoding options, and one's much higher quality than the usual junk by the big name providers. No everyone has crappy headphones/speakers and can't hear how bad their 128KB AAC crap is.

You can get around DRM but there are few ways in which doing so doesn't lead to loss of audio quality. Even if you download high bitrate DRM'ed music, burn it to a CD, and then rip it you will lose the DRM but also lose additional fidelity. You would have to rip the CD or transcode the music to .flac (or another lossless codec) just to preserve the already lossy quality of the original music. It's a pain in the ass.

I never understood why anyone trusted an illegal Russian web site who is run by who knows who with their credit card information anyways.

People are so stupid it is unbelievable.

LOL, they are doing it for free now. Pretty lame about the DRM bit tho :(

I wonder if the RIAA are going to hack into the place and get there IP's of the server hosting the files and try and take it down. I reckon they would do that haha

Edited by bennett

I never understood why anyone trusted an illegal Russian web site who is run by who knows who with their credit card information anyways.

People are so stupid it is unbelievable.

This topic is not about people who lost something in a Russian site.

It seems that your statement is just a preconceived opinion.

Maybe you have access to all music with a fair price.

If I want something different I have to spend about U$60 to U$80 per CD. Is it fair?

The music industry doesn't care about it.

I also have lots of vinyl. Did the music industry offer a digital version? No, same songs but I had to buy them again.

All the "legal" download sites exist due the "illegal" sites and p2p. They forced the music industry to rethink the way they sell music.

The "illegal" factor is the success key to your 2G iPod nano (Black) - 8GB! ;)

Chrisgeleven, here we go again. The site is not illegal. It is operate legally and own all rights on its content, via related rights (like on radio stations). The thing is forbidden in USA, but legal and considered natural in many countries. And Russia has clearly noted that it will not be forbidden, because it will be unnatural. Everyone trust it simply because it's largest music provider in the world.

As of USA.

1. They just mad, because they have lost Russian market.

2. They are mad because allofmp3 and other Russian internet music markets applies prices to local purchasing power. $15 in USA = $5 in developed subjects of Russia = $0.5 in rural subjects Russia.

I never understood why anyone trusted an illegal Russian web site who is run by who knows who with their credit card information anyways.

People are so stupid it is unbelievable.

Allofmp3 is a Russian entity and has been upheld by the Russian courts as being legal.

America's DMCA law does NOT apply to the whole world. Nor does America's other absurd copyright provisions.

I thought I would try it out, you listen to a couple of tracks, if I find something I like 99% of the time I nip over to amazon and buy the album anyway.

As for the Rusky's pirating your cc details thats a bit underhanded as you can always do a charge back and tell the bank why if allofmp3 would do that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!