AllofMP3 Fights Critics, Loses Visa


Recommended Posts

After months of being criticized both in the press and among music industry executives, Russian music service AllofMP3.com shot back Tuesday, saying its business is legitimate. It charged that it has attempted to compensate the record industry, but has been turned down.

AllofMP3's owner Mediaservices pays the Russian Multimedia and Internet Society a 15 percent cut of its sales, it claims. RMIS has attempted to pay the record companies the royalties, but the record companies have refused to take the money.

The record industry maintains that the licensing group has no right to collect or distribute royalties. However, AllofMP3 counters that by paying the group, the site operates within Russian laws. Typically, song downloads cost just pennies per track with full albums retailing for as little as $1 or less.

A slew of record industry organizations including the RIAA and IFPI claim that AllofMP3 is making millions by ripping off artists and consumers, who believe they are purchasing their music legitimately. Authorized services such as Apple's iTunes and Real Rhapsody charge at least 10 times as much for music downloads.

To fight these claims, Mediaservices held a press conference in Washington, D.C. Wednesday to publicly refute claims of piracy. Company Director Vadim Mamotin told reporters through a translator that "nothing could be further from the truth" when its critics call it a bastion for piracy.

Additionally, Mamotin rebuffed claims that his site is preventing Russia's entry into the World Trade Organization, although the U.S. Government has specifically fingered AllofMP3 as one of the reasons to hold up the country's entry into the trade body.

What still remains unclear is AllofMP3's profits or royalty payments. Officials refused to disclose that information at the press conference.

In related news, Visa said Wednesday that it was stripping AllofMP3 of the ability to take Visa credit cards. The company said its move was to comply with recent Russian legislation and international copyright law.

Source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/504544-allofmp3-fights-critics-loses-visa/
Share on other sites

Update: They're now planning on giving away free music and make money off advertising.

The AllofMP3.com soap opera takes another bizarre twist today with news that the site plans on giving its music away for free and supporting itself through advertising?just as Visa announces its intention to stop processing AllofMP3 payments.

The ad-supported model is exactly the sort of intriguing new initiative that one might announce in one's first-ever press conference, but AllofMP3 said nothing about it. Odd?but the company is still new at this, finally deciding to mount a public defense of its activities after years of attacks from the IFPI and (more recently) the US Trade Representative.

Rory Davenport of Qorvis Communications, who is now handling public relations for AllofMP3, tells Ars that the site's operators have been considering the ad idea for several weeks. The plan would be to offer two services: the current model in which people pay for access to non-DRMed songs, and a second model, where the songs would be free, but would come with DRM that would force consumers to view advertising. All of this would happen within a proprietary player, so burning to CD or syncing to a digital music player are both out of the question.

That plan looked a lot more important yesterday after the International Herald Tribune reported that Visa had finally pulled the plug on AllofMP3 and would not process any more payments from the site. Davenport was unable to confirm to Ars that this had in fact happened.

If true, it could be a death blow to the site. While the ad-supported model might attract some users, most are unlikely to be swayed by DRMed music that can't be moved to an iPod.

The timing of the move was interesting; AllofMP3 has been in business for years, but only had their credit card processing revoked the day that they held their first press conference. Neither Visa nor the IFPI responded to our inquiries by press time, but one certainly wonders whether the IFPI, with no luck petitioning the Russian government, finally found another way to create problems for AllofMP3.

The site still claims to accept credit cards, but we'll see how long this message lasts.

Source

If you want to use a Visa to buy through them, simply use the pre-paid iCard Click & Buy thing. :D

This is a smart move by allofmp3, though I'm not sure people will appreciate the DRM now. Then again, I don't mind one bit, DRM or not.

I don't like DRM, but I'll still be a fan of allofmp3.com

They are the only music sales place that is smart enough to offer many different encoding options, and one's much higher quality than the usual junk by the big name providers. No everyone has crappy headphones/speakers and can't hear how bad their 128KB AAC crap is.

You can get around DRM but there are few ways in which doing so doesn't lead to loss of audio quality. Even if you download high bitrate DRM'ed music, burn it to a CD, and then rip it you will lose the DRM but also lose additional fidelity. You would have to rip the CD or transcode the music to .flac (or another lossless codec) just to preserve the already lossy quality of the original music. It's a pain in the ass.

I never understood why anyone trusted an illegal Russian web site who is run by who knows who with their credit card information anyways.

People are so stupid it is unbelievable.

LOL, they are doing it for free now. Pretty lame about the DRM bit tho :(

I wonder if the RIAA are going to hack into the place and get there IP's of the server hosting the files and try and take it down. I reckon they would do that haha

Edited by bennett

I never understood why anyone trusted an illegal Russian web site who is run by who knows who with their credit card information anyways.

People are so stupid it is unbelievable.

This topic is not about people who lost something in a Russian site.

It seems that your statement is just a preconceived opinion.

Maybe you have access to all music with a fair price.

If I want something different I have to spend about U$60 to U$80 per CD. Is it fair?

The music industry doesn't care about it.

I also have lots of vinyl. Did the music industry offer a digital version? No, same songs but I had to buy them again.

All the "legal" download sites exist due the "illegal" sites and p2p. They forced the music industry to rethink the way they sell music.

The "illegal" factor is the success key to your 2G iPod nano (Black) - 8GB! ;)

Chrisgeleven, here we go again. The site is not illegal. It is operate legally and own all rights on its content, via related rights (like on radio stations). The thing is forbidden in USA, but legal and considered natural in many countries. And Russia has clearly noted that it will not be forbidden, because it will be unnatural. Everyone trust it simply because it's largest music provider in the world.

As of USA.

1. They just mad, because they have lost Russian market.

2. They are mad because allofmp3 and other Russian internet music markets applies prices to local purchasing power. $15 in USA = $5 in developed subjects of Russia = $0.5 in rural subjects Russia.

I never understood why anyone trusted an illegal Russian web site who is run by who knows who with their credit card information anyways.

People are so stupid it is unbelievable.

Allofmp3 is a Russian entity and has been upheld by the Russian courts as being legal.

America's DMCA law does NOT apply to the whole world. Nor does America's other absurd copyright provisions.

I thought I would try it out, you listen to a couple of tracks, if I find something I like 99% of the time I nip over to amazon and buy the album anyway.

As for the Rusky's pirating your cc details thats a bit underhanded as you can always do a charge back and tell the bank why if allofmp3 would do that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!