Recommended Posts

As we all know, there is currently no WDDM driver for the most popular graphics card, the Intel 915. I have been trying the registry hacks in RC2 to see if I could force Aero Glass (Vista RC2 Business), but no luck. But, I have recently found out that Intel will be releasing a WDDM driver when Windows Vista is released (being a huge corporation, who knows if they are lying or not). This is odd how Micro$oft hasn't written a driver yet, as the Intel 915 supports everything that Aero requires (DirectX 9, Pixel Shader, 128 MB of Memory, 32-bit Support), we just need a WDDM driver. Please note that my system has an Intel Pentium M 1.73 GHz, 1 GB Memory, 80 GB Hitachi HDD, 8x Pioneer DVD-RW, 128 MB Mobile Intel 915 Graphics Card. I am currently running Windows XP on a 60 GB partition and Fedora Core 5 on a 20 GB partition, I used to run Windows Vista RC2 Business Edition.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/508350-aero-support-on-intel-915-cards/
Share on other sites

The Intel 915 is a motherboard chipset that uses the Intel GMA 900 video discrete logic. It isn't a true "video card" in the normal sense and it uses shared system memory.

If Intel releases a WDDM driver then it will likely be for overall system compatibility reasons. I wouldn't necessarily expect them to enable Aero on that hardware as it would probably not be very usable.

[Thread Moved from Windows Beta to Vista Beta]

The Intel 915 is a motherboard chipset that uses the Intel GMA 900 video discrete logic. It isn't a true "video card" in the normal sense and it uses shared system memory.

If Intel releases a WDDM driver then it will likely be for overall system compatibility reasons. I wouldn't necessarily expect them to enable Aero on that hardware as it would probably not be very usable.

[Thread Moved from Windows Beta to Vista Beta]

That is true, as the card relies on system memory. But, why does the Intel 945 support Glass, whereas the 915 may? There isn't a very high possibility that it could run Glass well, but it could run it (sure, it would make a Pentium III run faster than a Pentium M after that).

Edited by Fred Derf

This is odd how Micro$oft hasn't written a driver yet, as the Intel 915 supports everything that Aero requires (DirectX 9, Pixel Shader, 128 MB of Memory, 32-bit Support), we just need a WDDM driver.

I know you hate MS, but that doesn't mean you can blame them for not providing a driver. It's intel to blame for not including a WDDM driver for i915. In fact, their team is busy with i965.

But, I have recently found out that Intel will be releasing a WDDM driver when Windows Vista is released (being a huge corporation, who knows if they are lying or not).

Where did you hear this? Very recently on on the Intel forum, an Intel rep has said that there will be no WDDM drivers for the 915. In fact he said that it was not possible, though the explanation seemed a little sketchy to me.

Intel Forum

I was always under the impression that only the 945/950 card from Intel was going to be supported.

I've even made product purchase recommendations based on that very fact. (IE: People buy a computer with an ATI/nVidia card instead of an Intel 915 to support Aero)

I was always under the impression that only the 945/950 card from Intel was going to be supported.

I've even made product purchase recommendations based on that very fact. (IE: People buy a computer with an ATI/nVidia card instead of an Intel 915 to support Aero)

Well, I bought my laptop last year, prior to Microsoft shoving WDDM down our throats, but my systems are oriented towards being in a corporation, so we aren't worrying that much about Glass.

Where did you hear this? Very recently on on the Intel forum, an Intel rep has said that there will be no WDDM drivers for the 915. In fact he said that it was not possible, though the explanation seemed a little sketchy to me.

Intel Forum

Earlier this year some guy on an Intel forum said that there was eventually going to be a WDDM driver for the Intel 915. But, who knows.

I know you hate MS, but that doesn't mean you can blame them for not providing a driver. It's intel to blame for not including a WDDM driver for i915. In fact, their team is busy with i965.

But still, M$ has written drivers for devices before (ranging all the way back to Windows 95/NT4), so why not work on the more popular i915. If it never happens, I will transfer to Linux and stay with Linux for a while until I can afford to buy a MacBook.

Earlier this year some guy on an Intel forum said that there was eventually going to be a WDDM driver for the Intel 915. But, who knows.

it's probably the same guy "Chuck" we're talking about. He initially did say a driver was coming for the GMA900, but later corrected himself and said that only the GMA950 and up would be supported. This link I posted was his latest response to all the complaining in the Intel forum.

What 2D and 3D scores does a gma900 get in Vista RC2 anyway? It must be less than 2.0 and probably closer to 1.0

Windows Vista has its own built-in benchmarking utility, if you read the logs on a system with an i915 graphics card in it, or any card that doesn't have a WDDM driver, it will be limited to 1.9, and it got a 1.9, just like the 32 MB nVidia GeForce MX400.

i could not believe that intel wont support i915 (gma900). technically, this fits and the gma900 is fast enough to display aero smoothly. i think they will release a driver when vista is out for consumers.

Well, the card is not necessarily the best on the market (compared to the entry-level nVidia GeForce FX5200).

Intel may have a legal problem if they don't provide a WDDM driver, as many systems with GMA900 graphics were sold (and continue to be sold) as "Vista Ready" (not Vista Capable, but Vista Ready).

That is very true, but Microsoft has had exactly how many legal problems?

Intel may have a legal problem if they don't provide a WDDM driver, as many systems with GMA900 graphics were sold (and continue to be sold) as "Vista Ready" (not Vista Capable, but Vista Ready).

My Sony Vaio FS515B was sold as "Vista Capable" and has a GMA900 (i915) Chipset... but no aero

My Sony Vaio FS515B was sold as "Vista Capable" and has a GMA900 (i915) Chipset... but no aero

Vista Capable is different from VISTA PREMIUM READY....which is 1GB of RAM, 128 MB of Graphics card which supports Vista driver model(only these drivers support aero ui like flip3d,glass window etc!)..but i am not sure whether sony vaio is aero supported!

Intel may have a legal problem if they don't provide a WDDM driver, as many systems with GMA900 graphics were sold (and continue to be sold) as "Vista Ready" (not Vista Capable, but Vista Ready).

Just because is Vista ready doesn?t necessarily mean Aero ready. I think they are 2 separate thing, you can perfectly run Vista on a computer that doesnt supports Aero.

Vista Capable is different from VISTA PREMIUM READY....which is 1GB of RAM, 128 MB of Graphics card which supports Vista driver model(only these drivers support aero ui like flip3d,glass window etc!)..but i am not sure whether sony vaio is aero supported!

this sony vaio has centrino 1.7 ghz, 1024mb ram, integrated dx9 graphics with pixel shader 2.0 and 128mb of non dedicated ram. i hear that some people even with 64 mb graphic cards can run aero... would be angry if intel wont provide a wddm driver for i915.

this sony vaio has centrino 1.7 ghz, 1024mb ram, integrated dx9 graphics with pixel shader 2.0 and 128mb of non dedicated ram. i hear that some people even with 64 mb graphic cards can run aero... would be angry if intel wont provide a wddm driver for i915.

There is a slight problem, if you have 1 GB of Ram and the Intel 915 graphics card, it bumps the amount of memory down to 1016 MB from 1024 MB.

My Sony Vaio FS515B was sold as "Vista Capable" and has a GMA900 (i915) Chipset... but no aero

There is Vista Capable (it can run Vista, but without Aero) and there is Vista Premium Ready (it can run Vista, with Aero.

this sony vaio has centrino 1.7 ghz, 1024mb ram, integrated dx9 graphics with pixel shader 2.0 and 128mb of non dedicated ram. i hear that some people even with 64 mb graphic cards can run aero... would be angry if intel wont provide a wddm driver for i915.

Microsoft says in one of the Vista help files that if your resolution is 1280x1024 or lower, you can use a 64 MB WDDM compatible graphics card. If they were able to get Aero, they either had a 64 MB WDDM graphics adapter or used a registry hack (my laptop has an Intel 915 card and my desktop has an nVidia GeForce2 MX400 32 MB AGP running Linux and is working perfectly fine (see signature))

There is a slight problem, if you have 1 GB of Ram and the Intel 915 graphics card, it bumps the amount of memory down to 1016 MB from 1024 MB.

There is Vista Capable (it can run Vista, but without Aero) and there is Vista Premium Ready (it can run Vista, with Aero.

Microsoft says in one of the Vista help files that if your resolution is 1280x1024 or lower, you can use a 64 MB WDDM compatible graphics card. If they were able to get Aero, they either had a 64 MB WDDM graphics adapter or used a registry hack (my laptop has an Intel 915 card and my desktop has an nVidia GeForce2 MX400 32 MB AGP running Linux and is working perfectly fine (see signature))

okay, ive tried several registry hacks - with no result. the resolution is 1280x800x32bit. so i have to wait for an updated wddm driver (hopefully) or someone will post a regsitry hack which works for the rtm (hopefully) ;)

ive also added 512mb of ram - with no result. i cant believe that this could be the point... in fact i have 1 gig of ram... these little megabytes cutted by the i915... hmpf.... we will see in rtm.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • too bad the "backend" June 2026 ESD files are still at build 26200.8653 and not at the correct build 26200.8655 release. I'll avoid using the MCT for several weeks until late July 2026
    • Qualcomm's new Snapdragon Reality Elite chip brings on-device AI to Android XR devices by Pradeep Viswanathan Qualcomm has been delivering dedicated SoCs for mixed reality and spatial computing devices for several years. The journey started with the Snapdragon XR1, followed by the Snapdragon XR2 in 2019, the Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 in September 2023, and finally the Snapdragon XR2+ Gen 2 in 2024. Today, Qualcomm announced a major upgrade with the new Snapdragon Reality Elite Platform, which targets premium mixed reality and spatial computing devices. OEMs can use this SoC to power both all-in-one video-see-through headsets and lightweight, tethered optical-see-through glasses. Qualcomm highlighted that the Snapdragon Reality Elite will power the next wave of Android XR devices coming later this year. These wearables will offer better visuals, improved power efficiency, and deeper on-device AI integration compared to the previous generation. The Snapdragon Reality Elite can deliver up to 48 TOPS of AI performance, allowing large language models and large vision models to run directly on the device for the first time. In addition to enabling new spatial AI experiences, these new AI capabilities will improve head and hand tracking, as well as see-through features. On the performance side, the Snapdragon Reality Elite offers up to 60% higher GPU performance, up to 30% higher CPU performance, and up to 160% higher NPU performance compared to the previous generation. The platform supports visuals of up to 4.4K per eye at 90 frames per second for sharper images and smoother motion. Qualcomm is also claiming significant efficiency improvements. The Snapdragon Reality Elite can offer up to 20% longer battery life under the same workload. More importantly, the chipset can run up to 12 degrees Celsius cooler under load, making headsets more comfortable for users to wear for longer periods. The platform also includes improvements to video see-through, featuring lower latency and better image quality. Qualcomm states that its EVA hardware block helps accelerate demanding computer vision workloads, improving how digital content blends with the real world.
    • Umm... GitHub continues to use AWS. That's the story, that's the headline. There's no "new" news here. GitHub continues to require additional capacity beyond the originally-planned Azure allocations. There's nothing special about this; nothing noteworthy. They're still using AWS' infra until the cutover is complete.
    • Hello, Also known for https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/29/adware-internet.   Regards, Aryeh Goretsky    
    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!