Recommended Posts

this sony vaio has centrino 1.7 ghz, 1024mb ram, integrated dx9 graphics with pixel shader 2.0 and 128mb of non dedicated ram. i hear that some people even with 64 mb graphic cards can run aero... would be angry if intel wont provide a wddm driver for i915.

64MB of dedicated video memory is better than 128mb of non-dedicated memory.

Why would Intel not make drivers? It can only increase their product popularity!?

The Intel 915 is close to not being sold anymore and is probably going to be replaced by Intel 945/955/965 chipsets.

64MB of dedicated video memory is better than 128mb of non-dedicated memory.

Very true, I have a 32 MB dedicated graphics card in my desktop with equal to the performance of my 128 MB i915 in my laptop.

Because they would rather sell you a new chipset and make a new "Vista Aero compatibility" a carrot for it too.

Typical CEO thought "Get Money!"

okay, ive tried several registry hacks - with no result. the resolution is 1280x800x32bit. so i have to wait for an updated wddm driver (hopefully) or someone will post a regsitry hack which works for the rtm (hopefully) ;)

ive also added 512mb of ram - with no result. i cant believe that this could be the point... in fact i have 1 gig of ram... these little megabytes cutted by the i915... hmpf.... we will see in rtm.

The registry hacks stopped working as of Windows Vista 5536.

Actually I thought video memory really didnt matter? Thats why going to a 512MB card does nothing vs a 256mb one

There is only a difference in resolution support (a 4 MB card can support 1280x1024x64k, but an 8 MB card can support 1600x1200x16.7M).

PLEASE DON'T REPLY OR ADD TO THIS ENTIRE THREAD BETWEEN NOVEMBER 1, 2006 AND NOVEMBER 30, 2006.

Edited by linuxfan

The registry hacks stopped working as of Windows Vista 5536.

There is only a difference in resolution support (a 4 MB card can support 1280x1024x64k, but an 8 MB card can support 1600x1200x16.7M).

so my 256MB card can handle like 190000x1080000

Actually I thought video memory really didnt matter? Thats why going to a 512MB card does nothing vs a 256mb one

Cards with more video memory can handle more resolutions or more polygons. They are capable of handling more complexity. Some games may eventually require 512MB video cards due to the resolutions and number of polygons/special effects used by the game.

My point, however, was that dedicated video memory (even if it is smaller) will always be preferable over shared (non-dedicated) memory.

Cards with more video memory can handle more resolutions or more polygons. They are capable of handling more complexity. Some games may eventually require 512MB video cards due to the resolutions and number of polygons/special effects used by the game.

My point, however, was that dedicated video memory (even if it is smaller) will always be preferable over shared (non-dedicated) memory.

Very true. I use my computers for corporate use, so I do not need a very high-end graphics card, I only need a 32 MB graphics card to do my work, also I find playing computer games very juvenile.

Cards with more video memory can handle more resolutions or more polygons. They are capable of handling more complexity. Some games may eventually require 512MB video cards due to the resolutions and number of polygons/special effects used by the game.

My point, however, was that dedicated video memory (even if it is smaller) will always be preferable over shared (non-dedicated) memory.

It always is preferred to have an AGP card with 64 MB of memory than an integrated with 128 MB.

  • 3 weeks later...

Here is the official Intel statement

http://www.intel.com/support/graphics/sb/cs-023606.htm#5

Q5: Why doesn't the Intel 915 Express chipset family support Windows Vista Aero?

A: The overall graphics architecture and design of the 915 Express chipset family (with Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 900 graphics engine) was finalized prior to Microsoft releasing details and specifications around the Windows Display Driver Model driver and running the Aero interface. Given this, there are hardware limitations that would limit graphics performance and memory capabilities when attempting to run WDDM on Vista with the 915 Express chipset architecture. Intel addressed these hardware limitations with the desktop and mobile Intel 945 Express chipset families, so Intel provides support for WDDM drivers beginning with the Intel 945 Express chipset family and beyond.

Frankly, this is VERY surprising. My "Mobile Intel® 915GM/GMS,910GML Express Chipset Family" display adapter can run World of Warcraft in 1920x1200 with satisfying performance and Intel is telling that it can't display a few transparent windows ?... Could someone provide a more detailed explanation here ?

Intel has simply chosen not to release 915 drivers, as the first poster mentioned, the specs of the 915 to the 945 are almost the same, i think the only difference is the amount of shared memory that it can use.

In fact when we still believed vista to make its appearance sometimes in 2005, the 915 was supposed to be able to do glass, and i in fact recommended to people buying notebooks, that it would be ok, granted, for the most part at the time, it was the only thing that was available.

as a previous poster mentioned, Intel just wants to push their 945/965 chipsets, i really don't know how we can get them to make a wddm driver for the 915 chipset.

Here is the official Intel statement

http://www.intel.com/support/graphics/sb/cs-023606.htm#5

Q5: Why doesn't the Intel 915 Express chipset family support Windows Vista Aero?

A: The overall graphics architecture and design of the 915 Express chipset family (with Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 900 graphics engine) was finalized prior to Microsoft releasing details and specifications around the Windows Display Driver Model driver and running the Aero interface. Given this, there are hardware limitations that would limit graphics performance and memory capabilities when attempting to run WDDM on Vista with the 915 Express chipset architecture. Intel addressed these hardware limitations with the desktop and mobile Intel 945 Express chipset families, so Intel provides support for WDDM drivers beginning with the Intel 945 Express chipset family and beyond.

Frankly, this is VERY surprising. My "Mobile Intel? 915GM/GMS,910GML Express Chipset Family" display adapter can run World of Warcraft in 1920x1200 with satisfying performance and Intel is telling that it can't display a few transparent windows ?... Could someone provide a more detailed explanation here ?

This really bugs me. If it weren't for this crappy integrated graphics, my system would be getting a 3.9 on the Windows Experience Index. As it is, with my GMA 900, I'm getting a 1.0. Just sad.

The Vista Basic theme looks butt ugly. Since there aren't any third-party visual styles available yet, I'm considering switching to Windows Standard until a half-decent third-party theme is released.

This really bugs me. If it weren't for this crappy integrated graphics, my system would be getting a 3.9 on the Windows Experience Index. As it is, with my GMA 900, I'm getting a 1.0. Just sad.

The Vista Basic theme looks butt ugly. Since there aren't any third-party visual styles available yet, I'm considering switching to Windows Standard until a half-decent third-party theme is released.

Yep, same here. You should sign this: http://www.petitiononline.com/intel915/petition.html

Cheers

try this guys hope this would help

Ensure that two registry values are set:

a. HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\DWM\Composition set to 1 (32-bit DWORD)

b. HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\DWM\CompositionPolicy set to 2 (32-bit DWORD)

Note: You may need to create the DWM key and the two values if they do not exist.

2. Restart the Desktop Windows Manager Session Manager service:

a. Open a command prompt with administrative privileges.

b. Type the following lines, pressing ENTER after you type each line:

net stop uxsms

net start uxsms

  • 1 month later...

The lakeport drivers are the 945 drivers (but nobody calls them that...)

but they dont work with the RTM version.

I started the petition... sent emails to both intel and microsoft and nothing! I even sent it to most major US newspapers and zero... but please sign it.

BTW, I moved to Ubuntu linux yesterday.

I got tired of this crap.

It still isn't officially supported. Intel seems pretty clear that they only care about i945 users and up (at least with respect to Aero).

Q: Is Intel providing support for WDDM drivers for Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 900 (Intel GMA 900) on Intel? 915 Express chipset-based platforms?>

A: Intel will provide support for WDDM drivers beginning with the Intel? 945 Express chipset family and beyond.

Windows Vista is supported on the Intel? 845G, 865G, 915G Express desktop chipsets and 852/855GM mobile chipsets running XP drivers for Intel graphics. Windows Vista will install on these platforms, but advanced features such as Windows Aero will not be enabled as Vista drivers using WDDM are required for Windows Aero.

http://www.intel.com/support/graphics/sb/CS-023606.htm#3

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!