Recommended Posts

Hey guys i need a tip from you, experienced digital cam users.

I want a new camera and ive been reading at dpreview alot. I resumed my choices to these 4 cameras below:

1st place

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2

(this one would be my favourite till now)

2nd place

Canon PowerShot SD900

(the latest addition)

3rd place

Fujifilm FinePix F30

(good reviews everywhere)

4th place

Canon PowerShot S3 IS

(not sure about this one, seems a bit big for me, so it would be the last choice)

From here i dunno which one to choose.

I had a Sony DSC-P200 (great one) and a Pentax Optio S7 (didnt like it and sold it already).

I want a pocketcam with lots of features, i like to play around with its fuctions.

I appreciate your help, i dont want to make another mistake and buy a bad camera again like i did when purchased the Pentax Optio S7.

:santa:

edit start here

I would like the camera to have 16:9.

And im open to other camera options too.

Edited by Krpano
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/509722-4-digital-cams-1-choice/
Share on other sites

1 and 2 are compacts and 3 and 4 are DSLR-Like (Bridge) so you cannot compare them all

If you want a pocket cam, then 3 and 4 are eliminated

Between your choices, I'd take the Lumix, bigger LCD screen

And why absolutely having a 10MP P&S? Damn marketing!! :(

Personally, I'd never buy higher than 7MP for a P&S. I am looking to buy a camera for my wife and this will be something 7MP and lower because of noise due to sensor size

Thanks for your input mate.

Actually i dont need necessarialy a 10MB...i just tend to get the new models because normally they are faster and have improved menus and etc.

Are you saying the 7MB cams create less noise than a 10 MB ?

The noise is directly related to the sensor size ?

Sry but im no expert......:)

Btw, which is the 7MB camera will you be getting to your wife ?

1 and 2 are compacts and 3 and 4 are DSLR-Like (Bridge) so you cannot compare them all

If you want a pocket cam, then 3 and 4 are eliminated

Between your choices, I'd take the Lumix, bigger LCD screen

And why absolutely having a 10MP P&S? Damn marketing!! :(

Personally, I'd never buy higher than 7MP for a P&S. I am looking to buy a camera for my wife and this will be something 7MP and lower because of noise due to sensor size

How exactly is the F30 a bridge camera? I always thought of it as a compact, obviously not as the canon model mentioned, but it certainly doesn't have the size of a super zoom like the S3

Thanks for your input mate.

Actually i dont need necessarialy a 10MB...i just tend to get the new models because normally they are faster and have improved menus and etc.

Are you saying the 7MB cams create less noise than a 10 MB ?

The noise is directly related to the sensor size ?

Sry but im no expert......:)

Btw, which is the 7MB camera will you be getting to your wife ?

You mean MegaPixels.

I would go for the Fuji Finepix F30... Best noise performance of all those you mentioned :)

And yes, Noise is directly related to sensor size, at least to "normal" CCD, unlike Fujis Super-CCD ( on the f30) which has the best noise performance in the "compact" area. Hence why I would chose the F30 over the others.

Click here for info on sensor sizes

And here...

Thanks for your input mate.

Actually i dont need necessarialy a 10MB...i just tend to get the new models because normally they are faster and have improved menus and etc.

Are you saying the 7MB cams create less noise than a 10 MB ?

The noise is directly related to the sensor size ?

Sry but im no expert...... :)

Btw, which is the 7MB camera will you be getting to your wife ?

Sensor size is more important than Megapixel. Pro 4MP camera will create way better image than some 10MP P&S camera. If I am not mistaken, P&S sensor is around 12x smaller than DSLR sensor! As the camera I want to buy to my wife, I still don't know as I didn't have a look at it. If I find something, I'll tell you.

@ maudit, yes it was a typo..i wanted to say MP....:)

and those sites are really helpful...thx.

The F30 indeed looks a good opponent, too bad they use their own media (as jordanspringer said)

But ill keep it on my list.

@ Pink Floyd

Ill keep one eye on the sensors size from now on.

Ill keep reading about it, because i must decide till next week. When i have to pick up one.

About the Panasonics, anyone here had/have used/owned one of these:

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2

They look such a nice cam but i read alot about the noise problem.

Is it true or ppl are just too picky ?

Im really concerned about the noise, specially because i like to take alot of night shots (indoor and outdoor)

@ maudit, yes it was a typo..i wanted to say MP....:)

and those sites are really helpful...thx.

The F30 indeed looks a good opponent, too bad they use their own media (as jordanspringer said)

But ill keep it on my list.

@ Pink Floyd

Ill keep one eye on the sensors size from now on.

Ill keep reading about it, because i must decide till next week. When i have to pick up one.

About the Panasonics, anyone here had/have used/owned one of these:

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2

They look such a nice cam but i read alot about the noise problem.

Is it true or ppl are just too picky ?

Im really concerned about the noise, specially because i like to take alot of night shots (indoor and outdoor)

Well on reviews on sites like dpreview, dcresource and stevedigicams, photographyblog, all point out that panasonics weakness with it's current cams, is noise.

I'm Guessing you have a couple of SD cards from your previous cams, So i'd say go with the SD900.

Actually, all 4 are compacts, well dpreview states that they are anyway. I would consider the first 3 as compacts and the Canon S3 IS an slr-like digital camera.

The F30 has the best sensor for ISO 400, 800, 1600, 3200 in a compact. It is excellent in low light. Choose this if you like to shoot a lot in low light. If not, then go for the Canons. Don't go with the Panasonic, it is TERRIBLE at high ISOs. All in all, I would choose a Canon first as they have better image quality overall.

I have:

  • Canon 400D (xti) Digital SLR
  • Canon Powershot A620

1 and 2 are compacts and 3 and 4 are DSLR-Like (Bridge) so you cannot compare them all

If you want a pocket cam, then 3 and 4 are eliminated

Between your choices, I'd take the Lumix, bigger LCD screen

And why absolutely having a 10MP P&S? Damn marketing!! :(

Personally, I'd never buy higher than 7MP for a P&S. I am looking to buy a camera for my wife and this will be something 7MP and lower because of noise due to sensor size

Thanks guys.

Ok, i resumed my choice to:

Fujitsu F30 (even tho i dont like much its design, but i do pretent to take lots of night shots)

Canon SD 900

About the DSLRs:

I see the N80 and 400D have no stabilizator with its basic kit, but the A100 has (builtin).

Does this make a big difference to the point of making you choose the Sony ?

Or is it possible to make clear photos with the Nikon and Canon even without that option ?

I shake alot normally, do i need a tripod all the time ?

Thanks guys.

Ok, i resumed my choice to:

Fujitsu F30 (even tho i dont like much its design, but i do pretent to take lots of night shots)

Canon SD 900

About the DSLRs:

I see the N80 and 400D have no stabilizator with its basic kit, but the A100 has (builtin).

Does this make a big difference to the point of making you choose the Sony ?

Or is it possible to make clear photos with the Nikon and Canon even without that option ?

I shake alot normally, do i need a tripod all the time ?

If you take a lot indoor shots, sunset shots or night shots the F30 is the way to go. I have the F30 and its really good. It takes a little while to get use to and it does tend to have purple fringe in some shots (these can easly be corrected with photoshop.)

Anyways

check this forum out to get the answers you want

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1012.

About the DSLRs:

I see the N80 and 400D have no stabilizator with its basic kit, but the A100 has (builtin).

Does this make a big difference to the point of making you choose the Sony ?

Or is it possible to make clear photos with the Nikon and Canon even without that option ?

I shake alot normally, do i need a tripod all the time ?

image stabilization is definitely not necessary. what do you think people have been doing on film for the past 3/4 of a century? canon does make image stabilized lenses (i don't know anything about nikon), but they generally double the cost of lenses. generally, if you shoot with enough light and use the correct shutter speed, then there should be no problems with clarity. in adverse conditions, you'll probably need a monopod or tripod regardless of image stabilization.

  • 2 weeks later...

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2

They look such a nice cam but i read alot about the noise problem.

Is it true or ppl are just too picky ?

Im really concerned about the noise, specially because i like to take alot of night shots (indoor and outdoor)

I can't say anything about TZ1 and LX2, but I got today Lumix FX01. Yes. Indor night pics are not so good as from the Canon cams, but It still almost the same (I have compared it to my first Canon IXUS40 (PowerShotSD400)).

The Lumix noise (at least on my FX50) is not that good... there is a lot of noise at any ISO higher than 200, and the way that it is removed by the camera engine is not great, as the entire picture becomes blotchy and blurry. If you are looking for a great low light in a point and shoot the Fuji will do the best. Canon is better then Panasonic, but not as good as Fuji. I personally think the S3 IS is a big waste of money because of how large it is, and how little it offers compared to a smaller camera. I used to own the Canon Powershot A85 and then the A520, and they offered great quality pictures. I have a dSLR now so I just bought the Lumix as a backup snapshot cam, and was looking more for style and design rather than the best picture quality (although it does take sharp photos, just not great at high ISO).

For a point and shoot, who cares about having the best ISO performance if the camera is too big to be handy and unnoticable... go with the smallest and best designed. I personally don't like the Pentax picture quality, Canon, Fuji, Panasonic are all acceptable with their own strengths. It's best to pick something you can hold easily... the cams with big screens often have not much room to hold the camera and it becomes awkward... the Panasonics in this right are great because they are wider than most cams (and not as tall) so you have more thumb room on the back without having to be avoiding buttons.

Congrats Krpano - not really a pocketsize camera tho? :D

Anyways, how do you identify the sensor size?

and what is P&S?

I own a Konica Minolta A200 - look-alike SLR :D (_not_ slr)

I thinking of buying a real one this time.

- sorry for bumping the topic

Hey guys, i appreciate all your help.

Today i finally decided to go get my digicam...and i got a Canon EOS 400D.

Im chargind the batt. and installing the softwares/drivers.

Im so happy.

My first SLR.

Yay for me !!!

:D

Excellent choice! I have one too! I bought an extra 1500mAh battery + Canon EF 50mm f1.8 lens!

i too have been looking for my first digital SLR and realised that i probably need to remortgage the house to get one :(

did you get a good deal on the Rebel ?

i have been advised to stay away from cameras that will only allow C size sensor lenses to be attached is this one of them ?

i too have been looking for my first digital SLR and realised that i probably need to remortgage the house to get one :(

did you get a good deal on the Rebel ?

i have been advised to stay away from cameras that will only allow C size sensor lenses to be attached is this one of them ?

No, the 400D can accept EF and EF-S Lenses.

EF = Designed for full frame sensors

EF-S = Designed for crop sensors, such as APS-C size

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Now comes with a money back guarantee instead of a replacement! Hah
    • Rufus 4.15.2391 Beta by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2391 Beta changelog: Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Media Player Classic - Home Cinema 2.7.3 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - Home Cinema (MPC-HC) is a free and open-source video and audio player for Windows. MPC-HC is based on the original Guliverkli project (which is no longer maintained) and contains many additional features and bug fixes. As the continuation of the original Media Player Classic, MPC-HC isn’t flashy but it works with nearly any media format. MPC-HC uses DXVA technology to pass decoding operations to your modern video card, enhancing your viewing experience. And MPC-HC supports both physical and software DVDs with menus, chapter navigation, and subtitles. Overview of features A lot of people seem to be unaware of some of the awesome features that have been added to MPC-HC in the past years. Here is a list of useful options and features that everyone should know about: Dark interface Menu > View > Dark Theme When using dark theme it is also possible to change the height of the seekbar and size of the toolbar buttons. Options > Advanced Video preview on the seekbar Options > Tweaks > Show preview on seek bar Adjust playback speed Menu > Play > Playback rate The buttons in the player that control playback rate take a 2x step by default. This can be customized to smaller values (like 10%): Options > Playback > Speed step Adjusting playback speed works best with the internal audio renderer. This also has automatic pitch correction. Options > Playback > Output > Audio Renderer MPC-HC can remember playback position, so you can resume from that point later Options > Player > History You can quickly seek through a video with Ctrl + Mouse Scrollwheel. You can jump to next/previous file in a folder by pressing PageUp/PageDown. You can perform automatic actions at end of file. For example to go to next file or close player. Options > Playback > After Playback (permanent setting) Menu > Play > After Playback (for current file only) A-B repeat - You can loop a segment of a video. Press [ and ] to set start and stop markers. You can rotate/flip/mirror/stretch/zoom the video Menu > View > Pan&Scan This is also easily done with hotkeys (see below). There are lots of keyboard hotkeys and mouse actions to control the player. They can be customized as well. Options > Player > Keys Tip: there is a search box above the table. You can stream videos directly from Youtube and many other video websites You can stream videos directly from Youtube and many other video websites Put yt-dlp.exe or youtube-dl.exe in the MPC-HC installation folder. Then you can open website URLs in the player: Menu > File > Open File/URL You can even download those videos: Menu > File > Save a copy Tip: to be able to download in best quality with yt-dlp/youtube-dl, it is recommended to also put ffmpeg.exe in the MPC-HC folder. Several YDL configuration options are found here: Options > Advanced This includes an option to specify the location of the .exe in case you don't want to put it in MPC-HC folder. Play HDR video This requires using madVR or MPC Video Renderer. After installation these renderers can be selected here: Options > Playback > Output Ability to search for and download subtitles, either automatically or manually (press D): Options > Subtitles > Misc Besides all these (new) features, there have also been many bugfixes and internal improvements in the player in the past years that give better performance and stability. It also has updated internal codecs. Support was added for CUE sheets, WebVTT subtitles, etc. Media Player Classic - Home Cinema 2.7.3 changelog: Updated LAV Filters to version 0.82 Updated MPC Video Renderer to version 0.10.4.2550 Updated MPC Audio Renderer A few crash fixes, bug fixes and small improvements. Download: MPC-HC 2.7.3 (x64) | Standalone | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-HC 2.7.3 (x86) | Standalone Links: MPC-HC Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft will finally let you sign in to Edge with a Google account by Usama Jawad As things currently stand, Microsoft Edge only allows you to sign in to the browser with a Microsoft Account (MSA). This allows you to sync your browser settings and other data across other devices, as long as you sign in with the same account. However, Microsoft is now modifying this mechanism in a way that will likely please many users. In an update to its Microsoft 365 Roadmap, Microsoft has indicated that it will soon let users sign into Edge using a Google account from the profile menu and the Edge sign-in screen. This will be in addition to the MSA login option, and it opens up new doors for people who prefer using Edge, but cannot be bothered to configure a Microsoft account. This brings several advantages such as the ability to sync your data across devices using just a Google account. It may even facilitate flexible single sign-on (SSO) experiences where you can quickly login to websites and services through a single Google account that is presented as the preferred sign-in option. Up until now, Microsoft allowed customers to indirectly use a Google account, by configuring a Google account as a Microsoft account, or by setting up a one-way sync option between Edge and Chrome. This is a rather interesting development, especially considering that Google Chrome still limits you to a Google account sign-in, but it will be interesting to see if the company reciprocates Microsoft's gesture in the future. This is not the only recent instance in which Microsoft has extended a handshake to Google via Edge. In April 2026, it began tracking the development of a work search banner for Google Search queries, just like the one present in Edge. However, if we go back almost seven years, to January 2020, Microsoft had emphasized that it had no plans to "integrate Google services into Microsoft Edge by default", in response to people requesting Google sign-in services on Edge. Fast-forward to today, and Microsoft is planning to release this feature in July 2026, with IT admins having the option to control its availability on Windows and macOS through the NonMicrosoftAccountSignInEnabled policy.
    • If they ever come out and say the AI is no longer accessible to the gen pop people aren't going to know how to tie their own shoelaces.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!