Bill Gates: TV As We Know it, Obsolete in 10 years


Recommended Posts

I'm sure he's right about TV. Don't know about books though. I think they will be around for at least another 25-30 years until fully replaced.

Books will always be around just as postal mail will.

Some things are too important to leave in the hands of electricity and technology.

What if books became obsolete in 25 years and then an EMP bomb goes off?

Where are all your emergency telephone numbers and safety booklets now?

Bill Gates, the (false?) prophet. (yea, I remember when he said the same with the DVD)

Didnt he say that 64mb ram would be enough for everything ?

Anyway, I think he's right this time. TV is already changing... but on the DVR side. Having things such as tivo or windows media center... that's the future, imo. "Interactive tv" has been possible for like 5 years, and still hasn't kicked off

To me TV is already obsolete, but books ? never.

Books are not the same as digital media. Pictures express more than words. eBooks should take over and no books should be made :) Like 56K to DSL, I think books accually degrate us from advancing techology.

This of course is a personal opinion :)

Didnt he say that 64mb ram would be enough for everything ?
:rofl:

Read the thread. It was "640K". And that's "kilobytes", as in old-school computing. ;) Heck, there were even 4K consumer PCs back in the day, being sold in glossy magazine ads.

On top of that, there is no documented evidence that he ever even said that. Sort of an internet tale that refuses to fade away.

Theyre becomming more popular just slowly and if you ask me its a technical and price issue more than it is consumers being shy. I would LOVE to get a tablet instead of a laptop as it can do everything a laptop can and more but why would I get a tablet pc when an equivalently specced laptop is roughly 1/3 the price.

Origami is affordable but it also has its drawbacks. First the battery life sucks, we need a new battery tech and fast (and that applies to laptops, mp3 players ect too). It's also designed to run any windows app but to be honest it lacks the power to do alot of what people would want. Storage is also a huge issue last time I looked with the base models being 20GB. I havent looked for 6 months or so but.

Again its cheaper to get a base level laptop than an orgami and the laptop will be more powerful most likely too.

Agreed. They really need to get some of their prototypes to production, such as those using hydrogen or fuel cell batteries. Until then, I will stick with my notebook though I do like that the Windows XP Tablet PC Edition has improved from its first rendition, especially the handwriting recognition.

As for books, they will always be around no matter what new technology that comes around with the potential to replace it. I like reading a lot (my favourite writer is Agatha Christie) and I will always love the feel of a book in my hand. The only thing that really concerns me is the usage of paper, in which I hope that they use recycle paper to ensure the environment does not suffer from excessive use.

It's just like with internet. Soon we will go satalite, and may be even by electricty.

Err... ok :blink: . You have just made one of the most confounding and bewildering statement that I have ever read on this forum... :| .

Scirwode

Books will always be around just as postal mail will.

Some things are too important to leave in the hands of electricity and technology.

What if books became obsolete in 25 years and then an EMP bomb goes off?

Where are all your emergency telephone numbers and safety booklets now?

I have news for you. Someday everything will be in the hands of technology and electricity. It's just a matter of when. But you do have a good point about EMP bomb. But I'm sure by then we would figure something out.

I personally feel books will disappear. They just aren't convenient and are extremely fragile as a form of information. Now I don't think it will necessarily happen in our lifetime but mark my word it will happen.

I mean whats the sense in having a book when you can have a paper thin screen with 2 buttons, one to scroll to tne next page and one to go back. Considering that could store 100's of books it makes pure sense. It would also be cheaper for publishers since books wouldnt be manufactured as much as they are provided electronically.

Really I see no advantage to having a book when the right medium arrives for reading electonic documenets. ATM no such device exists that can be used say in bed but it'll happen. The only thing that would keep them going is people latching onto them because they arent ready to let go but im sure many people said records would never be replaced and look what happened.

Hell it may not be a sign but how often does software come with electronic documents now days as opposed to the few hundred page books wed get in the past. ALso digital books can be searched, bookmarked, blogged ect ect far easier.

But yeah, theyd need a hand held device to cater for their reading and no such device exists yet.

Yes thats what people are saying about children and how they should be using e-books on laptops instead of using paper books. So what will happen is that they will drop their laptops and break them, run out of battery life, play games when they should b estudying.

What I think is a little stupid about your view (no offense) is the idea that books have to be pitted against e-books in some all-or-nothing battle.

Books are easier to use in a lot of ways, different from how electronic media are. The idea that physical media (what books are, really) will become obsolete is silly. (Question: will painting and drawing become obselete as Adobe Photoshop advances? Will everyone use Newton-like sticky pads like in that SNL spoof?)

Its just that, the role of books will have to change and be narrowed. People will buy books, like they still buy CDs over downloading mp3s, because they want it on their shelf, because they're interested in it, and it isn't just some fad. Like music CDs will likely be packaged differently, come with more art,etc---books will either be more artful and more meaningful in structure or content, or not published, unless they need to be sold to low income people.

(First thing to die: thousands of boring cook books and travel books)

The reason that records don't exist much anymore, is because CDs are basically records, except smaller. They're just smaller records. e-books are not basically just books, in a lot of cases. But analog records actually are still published and used for smaller music scenes, where they find some value in them.

And personally even though I think networks should use digital signals, laws requiring digital only transmissions I think are dumb, because the whole embrace of digital over analog media is a little shaky. Digital things always need to be decoded, and there is some value in having a pure signal that doesn't need to be decoded, even if it degrades. I know, if for nothing else, it will be used for emergency broadcasts. But really there should be a structure in place for public use of analog tv signals. Even if that means analog broadcast is more like a public community medium, more like radio is, than the corporate structure tv has now.

Edited by brianshapiro

I have news for you. Someday everything will be in the hands of technology and electricity. It's just a matter of when.

Why? Just remember a couple of decades ago when everything was made of plastic, it was like the coolest thing back then.

Electronic devices (handhelds and the likes) are still new stuff, and it will take a while to realize where they fit and where they don't.

I dont think so, TV is here to stay. I watch alot of programs on my computer, but thats because I have downloaded them, as i missed something, or wanted to get something that no longer is on TV. But when something like a Doctor Who Christmas spesal is coming on. **** the computer. I wana watch it on a real TV. its just better, feels more write, and more fun. Even if I had a massive computer screen, still not the same.

eBooks should take over and no books should be made

I've got books over 100 years old. They don't need batteries or replacement hardware every so often. They might take up a bit more space than a piece of electronics that will be considered obsolete in the next 3 years, but I'd much rather have them, basically because I'm not going to repeatedly pay to read something.

If Bill Gates thinks he has to go to a museum when he's asked outside a record store what a record looks like, he's either been misquoted or is the richest retard in the history of the planet, possibly the universe.

Why? Just remember a couple of decades ago when everything was made of plastic, it was like the coolest thing back then.

Electronic devices (handhelds and the likes) are still new stuff, and it will take a while to realize where they fit and where they don't.

Technology grows exponentially. If you were to travel 50 years into the future, you would not recognize Earth.

Tv wont be totally alienated. The World of Standard Tv will have been fazed out by 2015, But Digital and HD Tv are Still like Beta Programs, There still not up to scratch. Computer to Tv Migration is getting more popular each day. Standard Tv cards will have to be fazed out due to all these changes but we see all these HD-cards coming out when there is hardly any support for these.

What are they going to do if people can't afford Digital nor HD-TV, we going to go back to the Radio Era....

If Bill Gates Want's to think this heh let him ;) atleast it will stop him from making a big fuss out of it all.

Electronic devices are the rage now, but they will become obsolete relatively soon.

And I'd bet books will still be there.

In some areas technology is already starting to slow down. People will find it very hard to find a reason to buy Windows Vista - despite it's new interface, new sound stack, networking features, etc.

People will find it even harder to find a reason to upgrade from their Blu Ray / HD DVD players to HVD...

At the moment, all were doing is merging devices, increasing quality, speeds and capacities -- reinventing the wheel basically. Better technologies will continue to come along for many years yet and eventually become very affordable, yet there will come a point when all that there is left to add is bloat. That is, unless a revolutionary new branch of technology is suddenly realised (nanotechnology, AI, quantum computing, etc.).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!