Bill Gates: TV As We Know it, Obsolete in 10 years


Recommended Posts

I'm sure he's right about TV. Don't know about books though. I think they will be around for at least another 25-30 years until fully replaced.

Books will always be around just as postal mail will.

Some things are too important to leave in the hands of electricity and technology.

What if books became obsolete in 25 years and then an EMP bomb goes off?

Where are all your emergency telephone numbers and safety booklets now?

Bill Gates, the (false?) prophet. (yea, I remember when he said the same with the DVD)

Didnt he say that 64mb ram would be enough for everything ?

Anyway, I think he's right this time. TV is already changing... but on the DVR side. Having things such as tivo or windows media center... that's the future, imo. "Interactive tv" has been possible for like 5 years, and still hasn't kicked off

To me TV is already obsolete, but books ? never.

Books are not the same as digital media. Pictures express more than words. eBooks should take over and no books should be made :) Like 56K to DSL, I think books accually degrate us from advancing techology.

This of course is a personal opinion :)

Didnt he say that 64mb ram would be enough for everything ?
:rofl:

Read the thread. It was "640K". And that's "kilobytes", as in old-school computing. ;) Heck, there were even 4K consumer PCs back in the day, being sold in glossy magazine ads.

On top of that, there is no documented evidence that he ever even said that. Sort of an internet tale that refuses to fade away.

Theyre becomming more popular just slowly and if you ask me its a technical and price issue more than it is consumers being shy. I would LOVE to get a tablet instead of a laptop as it can do everything a laptop can and more but why would I get a tablet pc when an equivalently specced laptop is roughly 1/3 the price.

Origami is affordable but it also has its drawbacks. First the battery life sucks, we need a new battery tech and fast (and that applies to laptops, mp3 players ect too). It's also designed to run any windows app but to be honest it lacks the power to do alot of what people would want. Storage is also a huge issue last time I looked with the base models being 20GB. I havent looked for 6 months or so but.

Again its cheaper to get a base level laptop than an orgami and the laptop will be more powerful most likely too.

Agreed. They really need to get some of their prototypes to production, such as those using hydrogen or fuel cell batteries. Until then, I will stick with my notebook though I do like that the Windows XP Tablet PC Edition has improved from its first rendition, especially the handwriting recognition.

As for books, they will always be around no matter what new technology that comes around with the potential to replace it. I like reading a lot (my favourite writer is Agatha Christie) and I will always love the feel of a book in my hand. The only thing that really concerns me is the usage of paper, in which I hope that they use recycle paper to ensure the environment does not suffer from excessive use.

It's just like with internet. Soon we will go satalite, and may be even by electricty.

Err... ok :blink: . You have just made one of the most confounding and bewildering statement that I have ever read on this forum... :| .

Scirwode

Books will always be around just as postal mail will.

Some things are too important to leave in the hands of electricity and technology.

What if books became obsolete in 25 years and then an EMP bomb goes off?

Where are all your emergency telephone numbers and safety booklets now?

I have news for you. Someday everything will be in the hands of technology and electricity. It's just a matter of when. But you do have a good point about EMP bomb. But I'm sure by then we would figure something out.

I personally feel books will disappear. They just aren't convenient and are extremely fragile as a form of information. Now I don't think it will necessarily happen in our lifetime but mark my word it will happen.

I mean whats the sense in having a book when you can have a paper thin screen with 2 buttons, one to scroll to tne next page and one to go back. Considering that could store 100's of books it makes pure sense. It would also be cheaper for publishers since books wouldnt be manufactured as much as they are provided electronically.

Really I see no advantage to having a book when the right medium arrives for reading electonic documenets. ATM no such device exists that can be used say in bed but it'll happen. The only thing that would keep them going is people latching onto them because they arent ready to let go but im sure many people said records would never be replaced and look what happened.

Hell it may not be a sign but how often does software come with electronic documents now days as opposed to the few hundred page books wed get in the past. ALso digital books can be searched, bookmarked, blogged ect ect far easier.

But yeah, theyd need a hand held device to cater for their reading and no such device exists yet.

Yes thats what people are saying about children and how they should be using e-books on laptops instead of using paper books. So what will happen is that they will drop their laptops and break them, run out of battery life, play games when they should b estudying.

What I think is a little stupid about your view (no offense) is the idea that books have to be pitted against e-books in some all-or-nothing battle.

Books are easier to use in a lot of ways, different from how electronic media are. The idea that physical media (what books are, really) will become obsolete is silly. (Question: will painting and drawing become obselete as Adobe Photoshop advances? Will everyone use Newton-like sticky pads like in that SNL spoof?)

Its just that, the role of books will have to change and be narrowed. People will buy books, like they still buy CDs over downloading mp3s, because they want it on their shelf, because they're interested in it, and it isn't just some fad. Like music CDs will likely be packaged differently, come with more art,etc---books will either be more artful and more meaningful in structure or content, or not published, unless they need to be sold to low income people.

(First thing to die: thousands of boring cook books and travel books)

The reason that records don't exist much anymore, is because CDs are basically records, except smaller. They're just smaller records. e-books are not basically just books, in a lot of cases. But analog records actually are still published and used for smaller music scenes, where they find some value in them.

And personally even though I think networks should use digital signals, laws requiring digital only transmissions I think are dumb, because the whole embrace of digital over analog media is a little shaky. Digital things always need to be decoded, and there is some value in having a pure signal that doesn't need to be decoded, even if it degrades. I know, if for nothing else, it will be used for emergency broadcasts. But really there should be a structure in place for public use of analog tv signals. Even if that means analog broadcast is more like a public community medium, more like radio is, than the corporate structure tv has now.

Edited by brianshapiro

I have news for you. Someday everything will be in the hands of technology and electricity. It's just a matter of when.

Why? Just remember a couple of decades ago when everything was made of plastic, it was like the coolest thing back then.

Electronic devices (handhelds and the likes) are still new stuff, and it will take a while to realize where they fit and where they don't.

I dont think so, TV is here to stay. I watch alot of programs on my computer, but thats because I have downloaded them, as i missed something, or wanted to get something that no longer is on TV. But when something like a Doctor Who Christmas spesal is coming on. **** the computer. I wana watch it on a real TV. its just better, feels more write, and more fun. Even if I had a massive computer screen, still not the same.

eBooks should take over and no books should be made

I've got books over 100 years old. They don't need batteries or replacement hardware every so often. They might take up a bit more space than a piece of electronics that will be considered obsolete in the next 3 years, but I'd much rather have them, basically because I'm not going to repeatedly pay to read something.

If Bill Gates thinks he has to go to a museum when he's asked outside a record store what a record looks like, he's either been misquoted or is the richest retard in the history of the planet, possibly the universe.

Why? Just remember a couple of decades ago when everything was made of plastic, it was like the coolest thing back then.

Electronic devices (handhelds and the likes) are still new stuff, and it will take a while to realize where they fit and where they don't.

Technology grows exponentially. If you were to travel 50 years into the future, you would not recognize Earth.

Tv wont be totally alienated. The World of Standard Tv will have been fazed out by 2015, But Digital and HD Tv are Still like Beta Programs, There still not up to scratch. Computer to Tv Migration is getting more popular each day. Standard Tv cards will have to be fazed out due to all these changes but we see all these HD-cards coming out when there is hardly any support for these.

What are they going to do if people can't afford Digital nor HD-TV, we going to go back to the Radio Era....

If Bill Gates Want's to think this heh let him ;) atleast it will stop him from making a big fuss out of it all.

Electronic devices are the rage now, but they will become obsolete relatively soon.

And I'd bet books will still be there.

In some areas technology is already starting to slow down. People will find it very hard to find a reason to buy Windows Vista - despite it's new interface, new sound stack, networking features, etc.

People will find it even harder to find a reason to upgrade from their Blu Ray / HD DVD players to HVD...

At the moment, all were doing is merging devices, increasing quality, speeds and capacities -- reinventing the wheel basically. Better technologies will continue to come along for many years yet and eventually become very affordable, yet there will come a point when all that there is left to add is bloat. That is, unless a revolutionary new branch of technology is suddenly realised (nanotechnology, AI, quantum computing, etc.).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!