Rainbow Six: Vegas |x360| Early Impressions


Recommended Posts

So I picked up my preorder of Rainbow Six: Vegas earlier today.

I was not even planning on opening it honestly, as I have yet to beat Gears Of War yet and not only that I am still very much amped about GOW's multiplayer and will be for quite sometime to come, but my GF's brother, whom I game online with quite often, called me up shortly after I got home from work, and simply asked me "are you ready to do some R6 CoOp? This game kicks ass!"

I told him no doubt, I would call him in an hour because since all I have played was GOW I wanted to get reacquainted with the controls again, and then we could play.

Create A Character With Vision Camera!!!

The entire next hour I did not even touch the game. Literally all I did for an hour was play around with creating my custom online character using my XBox Live Vision Camera. I can say after playing around with it for so long, that the best time to create a character is during the day, with natural sunlight as the lighting. I had to artificially simulate light as my living room is fairly dark lit only by one floor lamp. So I plugged in another lamp and tried it in several different positions... facing towards me, then away from me, then towards the cieling, then towards the floor... Even without ideal lighting conditions, it is unbelievable how much the face recongintion software works, the character looks EXACTLY like me. It is just slightly washed out because of the image I had to settle for, but it still looks damn good. After playing with it, I know for a fact with better lighting it can look even better. Truly they nailed this whole create a character with the camera feature, it even recreated my beard exactly how it looks. I am thoroughly impressed with the face mapping feature, and look forward to when I can do it during the day so it looks even better than it already does... I also look forward to this being implemented into other games, and now after seeing it in action, I am even more upset that TH Project 8 eliminated the feature.

Onto The Gaming: CoOp & CoOp Only.

After creating myself, I finally played the game, and so far all I have tried is the CoOp mode.

I am just so excited more games are utilizing CoOp, and I can say if this was the only mode they included in the game, I would be completely content and happy just with the CoOp. It was tons of fun, ran smooth as can be, and it was only the two of us. One of his friends already as the game, and one of my friends plans on at least renting it, so I look forward to when there can be 4 of us at once playing CoOp. It is not done as well as Gears Of Wars CoOp, but it is damn close.

On Thursday or Friday when I create my character using natural light, when I am done I will snap a picture of my TV, and if it comes out decent, I will post the shot of me as a character along with a picture of me taken that same day, so everyone can judge for themselves.

Summary (For Now)

From just playing the CoOp, I can say this game has a very bright future and I will be playing the hell out of it. I have not even tried Single Player or regular old Multiplayer, and I am already thoroughly impressed. What surprised me most is I figured after GOW, I would judge every game to it and not enjoy anything else, but that simply is not the case, and I am already glad I made the purchase.

Oh one last thing, I do not think either demo released for this game really truly did it justice.

IMO this is right up there on the top of the list of must have holiday titles. :yes:

I will update this thread within the next few days when I do play some SP & MP, but I also look for others to share the opinions and experiences with the game as well.

9.1 on gamespot

http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/rai...p;click=topslot

9.3 on ign

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/745/745678p1.html

looks like an awesome game. i loved all the rainbow six games and i'll definitely get this since i enjoyed the demo.

Thanks DirtyLarry, great impressions there, if I do decide to pick it up (need to complete GoW, SC: DA, Saints Row etc, etc) I think this will be the time for me to get the vision Camera.

A question, the create a character with vision camera, is the character used for Single player, CoOp and Multiplayer, or is it only some game modes?

Looks like a great game, I am loving all these great games.

I'll be interested in getting this if it makes it to PC. One question though; are the maps and gameplay more like RvS again (map planning, multiple routes to a location) or like Lockdown (no map planning, one route)?

I'll be interested in getting this if it makes it to PC. One question though; are the maps and gameplay more like RvS again (map planning, multiple routes to a location) or like Lockdown (no map planning, one route)?

It's like Lockdown in that case, no planning. Lots of it done on the fly though. Routes are linear until it comes to a room or hostage situation then planning is involved in clearing the room.

My observations are from the demo btw.

Thanks DirtyLarry, great impressions there, if I do decide to pick it up (need to complete GoW, SC: DA, Saints Row etc, etc) I think this will be the time for me to get the vision Camera.

A question, the create a character with vision camera, is the character used for Single player, CoOp and Multiplayer, or is it only some game modes?

Looks like a great game, I am loving all these great games.

No problem. (Y) Create a character is just for CoOp and Multiplayer I believe, not 100% sure but I do not think you can use it in Single Player, which makes sense because then your friends can see you.

As far as the maps, there are several different ways to approach each situation as far as I saw last night from doing the CoOp. We put it on Realistic, and kept dying plenty, so we really had to be strategical with the routes we took, and when one way was not working so well, we switched it up to a completely different approach.

I am loving the new health system in R6, GoW, and CoD3. Health packs always felt like it took away from the immersion for some reason. I'm picking up my pre-order later today so hopefully I'll get some good time in with the game over Thanksgiving with my cousins.

And here's to hoping co-op becomes a staple in all of the future blockbuster titles. Ever since Contra, co-op through an entire game has the been the most fun.

Does R6 Vegas play more like R63 and R63:Black Arrow, or does it play more like R6:Lockdown and R6:Critical Hour. I only ask because Lockdown and Critical hour deterred way to far away from the core style of R6 play. Movement felt off, accuracy was a joke, and the graphics actually worsened. R63 and the expansion Black Arrow where outstanding games though. I enjoyed them alot. Since Lockdown, I have been throughly disaapointed with the series and have always hoped that they would return to the roots. I liked the PEC mode for the most part, but it was the actual core gameplay that has been faulty. Has it been returned or does it still stray from the path?

ehm, this vision camera and RSV 'make-your-own-character' isnt really THAT awesome..

Tony Hawks had it for the PS2 :s

The Tony Hawk create a character, which I played around with my fair share as well, is for all practical purposes a joke compared to this one. So even though you are indeed correct that it is not a new concept so to speak, the implementation of it is without a doubt the best ever done in a video game.

Does R6 Vegas play more like R63 and R63:Black Arrow, or does it play more like R6:Lockdown and R6:Critical Hour. I only ask because Lockdown and Critical hour deterred way to far away from the core style of R6 play. Movement felt off, accuracy was a joke, and the graphics actually worsened. R63 and the expansion Black Arrow where outstanding games though. I enjoyed them alot. Since Lockdown, I have been throughly disaapointed with the series and have always hoped that they would return to the roots. I liked the PEC mode for the most part, but it was the actual core gameplay that has been faulty. Has it been returned or does it still stray from the path?

Wish I could answer you, but I have not played Rainbow Six since one of the very early versions, and I cannot even remember which one it was.

Does R6 Vegas play more like R63 and R63:Black Arrow, or does it play more like R6:Lockdown and R6:Critical Hour. I only ask because Lockdown and Critical hour deterred way to far away from the core style of R6 play. Movement felt off, accuracy was a joke, and the graphics actually worsened. R63 and the expansion Black Arrow where outstanding games though. I enjoyed them alot. Since Lockdown, I have been throughly disaapointed with the series and have always hoped that they would return to the roots. I liked the PEC mode for the most part, but it was the actual core gameplay that has been faulty. Has it been returned or does it still stray from the path?

I had just played the demo so don't take my word for it, Look's to me just like lockdown and critical hour. Graphic wise there's a lot of improvement, but game play is not like the one on PC (I know it's for console only but new games doesn?t stick to their roots) I don't know if it's a good thing or bad. Since the developers are not the same, the young ones (looking at the developer?s video preview on IGN) are in it for money. :whistle:tle:

this facial recognition SUCKS for me....I'm not bald ffs, I want my hair!

i keep getting "invalid front picture, please take it again"....now im getting "invalid side picture, please take again" and each time i have to wait like 5 damn minutes for it to generate an "invalid" image :/

This thing is killing me, at least I got the achievement for it though, but damn, this is not nearly as cool as I hoped it would be.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!