Recommended Posts

From what I understand you need at least a 40" TV to take advantage of 1080P.

Ahh so 720p is true HD then just the resolution for smaller sizes? Just i dont want to fork out the money and find out I will need 1080 in the future or its not as good quality.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/515150-720-vs-1080/#findComment-588074058
Share on other sites

1080p is more detailed then 720p but with a smaller set it would definitely be less noticeable. 720p is still HD and still looks nice. I still have yet to see a 1080p screen in action only 720p/1080i.

a BB in my area had a Blu ray player on a 40" LCD running 1080p.... ::in Borat's voice:: wowwee!

as mentioned earlier though... 1080p really only shines on the bigger screens.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/515150-720-vs-1080/#findComment-588079670
Share on other sites

a BB in my area had a Blu ray player on a 40" LCD running 1080p.... ::in Borat's voice:: wowwee!

as mentioned earlier though... 1080p really only shines on the bigger screens.

I believe that's "wowaweewa" :p

On a more serious note, you can certainly input a 1080p signal to your TV but you need a TV that supports 1920x1080 resolution in order to actually display the signal.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/515150-720-vs-1080/#findComment-588079671
Share on other sites

a BB in my area had a Blu ray player on a 40" LCD running 1080p.... ::in Borat's voice:: wowwee!

as mentioned earlier though... 1080p really only shines on the bigger screens.

We had the Samsung Blu-Ray player hooked upto a 40" Samsung 1080p, it was spectacular! :|

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/515150-720-vs-1080/#findComment-588079805
Share on other sites

FullHD is 1080p nothing else. And the "FullHD" is a marketing name that Sony stick to their 1080p TV. I'm not sure if other brand use the "FullHD" name.

But HDTV can be 720p, 1080i or 1080p. If your TV can only do 720p, everything above that will be downscaled to 720p. You will loose some details, but it's not that bad.

And 1080 on a 32" HDTV would be, IMO, pointless because the set is too small to see all the details anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/515150-720-vs-1080/#findComment-588080525
Share on other sites

Well, I output a 1080i signal from my HD sat receiver to my LCD (which is 720p native), and I like it better than the 720 output. That's more of a subjective thing, I think.

Actually, it's going to probably come down to the comparison of the scaler in the sat. box and the TV set. Most TV's are going to have better scalers than the cable/sat boxes will, so letting the TV do the scaling work will usually yield better results.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/515150-720-vs-1080/#findComment-588081696
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I really hope the author's health is ok. Squirreling away a official backup of this software. Looks like the internet archive already cached a copy as well - https://web.archive.org/web/20...ldbit-soft.fi/software.html
    • AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
    • I can answer about the Linux bit. I only used AMD GPUs. I currently have a 9060XT (8GB) that fits my needs, I'm not a gamer, so I don't need that much GDDR. But lately, NVIDIA has grown a lot in the recent years. Oh, the horrors of NVIDIA drivers not working. But they have been getting better. I know a lot of members onm here that are running cachyOS and other distros, and are fine with a 4090/5090 variants. Really, though, I would stick with AMD variants.
    • Everything they say you can already do yourself on the registry by changing some things.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!