Microsoft's Revamped WGA Puts Burden On Users


Recommended Posts

People who bash the WGA remember:

MS have the right to install any software that helps prevent copyright infringement. It's all in the EULA. So that class lawsuit won't work. The judge will simply throw the Windows EULA at whoever started the suit.

Hence I would do the same if I spent years working on a good operating system only to have it stolen and put out on bittorrent with cracks.

Piracy DOES hurt Microsoft. Remember MS is a huge company and money goes to the department of whichever the money was used to buy for, so if you bought Windows, money would go to the Windows department. Yes, therefore it's MS's but it's used for that department. So if you keep pirating, Windows department won't have enough to keep it going thus the end of Windows would loom.

I spent years working on a good operating system Im sure but microsoft did not create OSX. They created crapy windows, last I heard we still get BLUE SCREEN, and lest not mention SPYWARE, and all that other CRAPPPPP

This kind of report won't help them in thier "fight" against piracy. What a fcking rip off.

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/98967/brits-to...ffice-2007.html

Is it any wonder why people used pirate copies when M$ are ripping people off. All the pirates are doing is ripping them off? Those prices are obscene.

"Only" 70% more in the UK? It's even worse in Germany, the German Amazon already released the prices (update/full version).

Most versions are nearly twice as expensive! :crazy:

That's already ludicrously obscene!

Windows Vista Home Basic: 139€ ($185)/259€ ($345) -> 87%/73% more

Windows Vista Home Premium: 229€ ($305)/329€ ($438) -> 92%/83% more

Windows Vista Business: 279€ ($372)/419€ ($558) -> 87%/87% more

Windows Vista Ultimate: 349€ ($465)/549€ ($731) -> 80%/83% more

I think it has been established that WGA does give false warnings to paying customers and if anyone says different they are just plain wrong. That being said, how does a paying corp. customer such as myself eliminate this problem short of a reinstall?

I admit that I've run pirated copies of Windows and Office in the past, but now I have legit copies on all my computers. Even when I ran a pirated copy, though, I never had any issues with WGA whatsoever. It's within every right for Microsoft to protect their intellectual property. I'd do the same.

Obviously not :rolleyes:

Looks like piracy is really "hurting" M$ :rolleyes:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6191812.stm

If they don't use anti-piracy measures they will get an increase in piracy and a large loss in sales.

This will result in lower revenues.

They've got to keep up the fight.

If they don't use anti-piracy measures they will get an increase in piracy and a large loss in sales.

This will result in lower revenues.

They've got to keep up the fight.

Yeah but how many people actually buy retail Windows? I would assume most of their profits are from OEM and business sales.

I don't have an issue with WGA on my own system however I have annoying gripes about the license of Windows XP in general the way that Microsoft go about forcing WGA updates on consumers, how you must call them on the telephone to activate your copy of Windows XP, how you cant just forever transfer your copy of Windows XP from 1 computer to another and the price of Windows in general is day light robbery.

They make me annoyed but they own most of the market and although how they did that is up for debate I am practically forced to use Windows XP because of the applications I use demand it. Overall Windows (XP & Vista) are not great and we get a raw deal as consumers ripped off in every way possible.

Anyway I'm running Windows XP MCE. Reluctantly.

Yeah but how many people actually buy retail Windows? I would assume most of their profits are from OEM and business sales.

I second that :) OEM is one of microsoft strong points :)

Anyway i have never had a problem with WGA nor is notifications 1 reason i dont have it installed :blink: is there really any need of it when there are plenty of alternatives?

But you will get the odd person complaining about it :) well if you can't live with WGA switch OS they even state that you have the choice to install it or not and say in there disclaimer if you dont agree to the terms set discontinue to use the software or don't install it sooo.

With vista they will be able to switch off so called doggy installs.

So my point is quite simple if I buy something / vista when does it become mine ? :huh:

Name any other thing that you buy (Car, Food, House) that after you buy it, it wants to make sure that you had.

If you look at how much games (Gears Of War) and films (King Kong) cost to make compare these to how much it takes for software. Yet we feel its right to pay for over priced software that one day could be removed from us!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • The funny thing here is that like 70% or so of the web browser users use 'Google Chrome' as web browser. What I don't understand is that why on earth would ANYONE choose 'Google Chrome' on Windows when 'Microsoft Edge' is not just better in most things, but it's already there right out of the box for the Windows users. Microsoft Edge has less data collection (yes, that's a fact), less RAM usage and is more optimized for Windows (as it's a Microsoft product) right out of the box. I'm sure you will come with the argument of bloat in Microsoft Edge. Sure, but most of that can be fixed with a simple tool (there are many good ones out there for this). Yes, that require a couple of clicks in the same way as it requires several clicks to install 'Google Chrome'. And I'm sure you really love the 4 GB of AI-slop 'Google Chrome' is downloading without you agreeing to it. Fun right? Sure, the way Microsoft is pushing Microsoft Edge on users might not be the best way of doing it and might need to change. But I would never choose 'Google Chrome' over 'Microsoft Edge' today anyways. I'm sure there was a period back in the days when 'Google Chrome' actually was better in most things, but that period is not today.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
    • That stupid annoying Sign in with Google on all these sites now... get the fk outta here
    • I was just being silly based on David Uzondu's comment ☺️
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!