AutoPatcher XP November 2006


Recommended Posts

Hi all, can anyone help me with this problem?

"Module Panic

! Module Panic on Microsoft XML Parser (MSXML) 3.0 SP7!

You are running Windows XP Professional SP2 (locale 1033) + IE7

Parent and/or Prerequisite item missing?"

i already have the earlier version of AP installed before(Aug) before installing this version. Also i got the IE7 and MS Office 2007 installed before installing this version(Nov) of AP too. Anyone have any idea of how to solve this problem?

Thank you

If you're using the Nov Full release, delete your old install before using this. If you're using the update, you must have all of the updates in between August and November

maybe be an stupid question, but since that cumulative updates replaces old ones and msie7 is an critical update that replaces msie6, why KB922760, that is an cumulative update for msie6 is doing on autopatcher november? that is really needed?

I was looking at the Windows Server 2003 SP2 RC2 patchlist and found a few things that apply to Windows XP SP2. Perhaps they would be useful to add to Autopatcher Dec/Jan.

(recommended)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/913296/

Jet 4.0 data engine update fixes issues that may occur on a Windows XP-based computer

- Fixes errors with languages not originally supported in Jet 4.0

(recommended)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/896427/

After you install security update 885250 (MS05-011), you may not be able to view the contents of

a subfolder on a network share by using Windows XP or Windows Server 2003

- Fixes missing files & paths from server service shares.

(recommended)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/899271/

The updated USB Video Class (UVC) driver for Windows XP with Service Pack 2 is available

- Adds DV rendering to stream DV from PC to device & MPEG2TS capture

(recommended)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/913538/

A WMI enumerator object is canceled before the client computer can finish using the enumerator

object on a Windows Server 2003-based or Windows XP-based client computer

- When a WMI enumerator object is cloned internally, the object is cancelled before the object

can be used.

There are TONS of other relevant hotfixes that have no official release yet but should be made final as SP3 for XP and SP2 for 2003 get closer... FWIW, here's the list I found, relevant or not (and I have way too much time on my hands):

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/915030/ (Windows Installer)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/910720/ (12 fixes to COM+ V12)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/896100/ (MDAC 2.8SP2 Update)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/911570/ (ADO Crash)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/894087/ (Reverse #s with Hyphens on VB)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/892050/ (USB 2.0 EHCI error in XP)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/895312/ (1394 error with NEC controllers)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/898439/ (Bug in ATAPI.sys with 48-bit LBA)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/902853/ (Unneccary RAID restore op on Hibernation)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/914028/ (Bug in USB driver prevents standby)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/890067/ (MSDOS programs with switches have error)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/894463/ (Lengthening delays with opening network files)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/897574/ (STOP error w/ removable odd media sector sizes)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/332134/ (EUDC fonts not appearing correctly)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/901026/ (Memory corruption with PrivateFontCollection)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/904563/ (Cannot Print EMF file >2GB)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/915415/ (Error with saving large GIF images via Image.Save)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/916199/ (XP Stops Responding when clicking or resizing a window)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/896269/ (Cannot rotate/save image in Win Pic & Fax Viewer)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/902390/ (STOP error when using a scanner)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/892496/ (Group policy error/slow links)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/899409/ (20 sec delay when accessing a redir folder)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/892049/ (IE6SP1 does not display shortcut for AX control)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/900732/ (IE6: Never Dial Connection policy not implemented)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905299/ (IE6: Does not display some EMF images correctly)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905498/ (IE6: onbeforeunload unexpectedly occurs)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/908209/ (IE6: can't use kerberos on non-std ports)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/914453/ (IE6: web apps break when using chunked encoding)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918366/ (IE6: PDF error on HTTPS)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918956/ (IE6: error when opening favorites pane)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/925418/ (IE6: "runtime error" messages)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905890/ (Program runs slow when net con. to home folder is slow)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/912354/ (Memory leak winlogon.exe)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/921401/ (Memory leak when capturing MIDI SYSEx messages)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/896336/ (RSH command doesn't accept input)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/902149/ (FTP client may echo acct information)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/907019/ (Network traffic is interrupt when hot swapping a NIC)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/909195/ (no results when doing a filtered WINS name search)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/909425/ (Error in WinHTTP with certificates)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/911262/ (Slow performance with programs using WMI)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/913522/ (Network problems with >1 NIC)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/914301/ (CoCreateInstance may return HRESULT failure)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/914841/ (how to simplify creating/maint of IPSec filters)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/916852/ (TCP Packet retransmission issue)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918334/ (Error message when program makes CreateFile call)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918837/ (Power Mgmt turned off with NDIS Wireless Net Adapt)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/920155/ (Explorer rand. gen. acc. viol. closes, wireless)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/896256/ (Dec Perf with >1 CPUs that support pwr mgmt)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/921411/ (USB dev. stop working after Intel Chip ID Utility)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/924441/ (PC stops responding with PowerNow! driver installed)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/893225/ (Printer performance problems)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/906688/ (Error text page prints unnecessarily)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917777/ (Add Printer Wzd stops responding)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/924078/ (Error opening Printer Properties on Network Printer)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/892090/ (Group Policy settings not applied w/ Kerberos)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/896687/ (Cannot en/decrypt EFS unless member of same domain)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/909737/ (MSChapSrvChangePassword may unexpectedly fail)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/914463/ (WMI obj causes errors with SACL/HKEY_USERS)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/920183/ (Kerberos allows many login retries despite errors)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/893605/ (OutlookEx error IDS_INSTALLFAILED)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/899182/ (Registry Key Permissions are incorrectly ordered)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/892346/ (Cannot drag-n-drop/copy files to CD drive)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/908536/ (Horiz. scroll bar may not respond to mouse control)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/910728/ (update to remove EnergyStar logo from scrn svr tab)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/916452/ (Change time zone GMT-500/eastern)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/916453/ (Change time zone GMT-600/central)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/921028/ (Change time zone GMT+200/Cairo)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/922599/ (Archive attribute cleared if cluster size >4KB)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/896679/ (Shadow session disconnected between 2 web clients)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/920192/ (error messsage with win32k!xxxMenuWindowProc+b4f)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/900730/ (PrimaryVolumeSpaceRemaining property not set right)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/904023/ (WinMessenger 5.1 error in unattended mode)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/906219/ (WinInstaller doesn't install when /PATCH is used)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/902346/ (WMI: error messages 0x80041032 & 0x80041003)

maybe be an stupid question, but since that cumulative updates replaces old ones and msie7 is an critical update that replaces msie6, why KB922760, that is an cumulative update for msie6 is doing on autopatcher november? that is really needed?

And that brings me back to my un-answered question here:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...amp;p=588112461

I remember you guys said that once the problematic-at-first SP2 was out, you still supported SP1 for some period of time...what's with WIE7/WMP11 ? I really don't want to install a browser that's said to break a slew of working things on my PC, and I don't really need a new and bloated media player when I already use much slimmer 3rd-party solutions. However, I DO want all the updates to my installed IE6/WMP10, just to be safe in case some program tries to exploit them - will AP Nov06+ releases still update IE6/WMP10 if user choses not to install their successors ?

Thank you.

at the current rate (~30mbit+), my remaining 500gb wont last the week till the bandwidth is reset on my mirror, at the mo its no problem but i may need to slow it down in the next few days if things dont slow down :p

Yeah there was something about the launch of the new autopatcher.com website that unleashed some get em while it's hot frenzy. for the first few days I received about 80-90GB of bandwidth. Now I average 50-60GB of bandwidth per day. its insane. I'm pretty much out of bandwidth so if there's an Autopatcher release this month, well it won't last long.

PsiMoon314:

The security updates for .NET Framework 2 do not always install on the first run with APXP. I suspect this is because on clean systems without .NET Framework 2 already installed, they are run before .Net Framework 3 is installed.

i'm testing it. i id an pre-release with december updates and i've removed .net 2. also ap indexes releases by his own release date, i've moved that to .net 3 (so, if you select to install .net 3, it should install that 2 security updates for .net 2 just after .net 3, that may do the thing happends fine). so far, it will runs on my test machines only.

maxkohl:

> will AP Nov06+ releases still update IE6/WMP10 if user choses not to install their successors ?

that can be done. i did it on my beta builds. i was thinking something about updates for msie7 just be showed for msie7 and msie6 updates not showed if you already have msie7. the same thing to wmp10, but i was unable to do it right (i've always got some errors). so, i've let it behind. there's another issue regarding it too: size. ap is becoming fat and it will only do an diet when sp3 arrive (that should be in 2008/2009). more fat, more bandwith...

anyway, it's easy do an "home made" version with that includes that sort of updates. you just need grab that removed updates from a previews version, put that on his original places and compile it again. the hard thing becomes just add the new updates for that

xyz123, ms already had annouce that sp3 will not arrive in 2007. so, you just may expect that for 2008 or later. but of course, ms can change his plans again and again...

more infos about in english at zdnet or here

[]s

Edited by supermouse

Im a little late with this release, i usualy download as each is released but this time

i've had nothing to update for a change :wacko: But as always thank you for the update :D

Not to format my new machine :shiftyninja:

Yeah there was something about the launch of the new autopatcher.com website that unleashed some get em while it's hot frenzy. for the first few days I received about 80-90GB of bandwidth. Now I average 50-60GB of bandwidth per day. its insane. I'm pretty much out of bandwidth so if there's an Autopatcher release this month, well it won't last long.

my bandwidth luckily gets reset usually a week before a release gets released so i usually have almost all of it ready to be burned :p

Hi,

xyz123, ms already had announce that sp3 will not arrive in 2007. so, you just may expect that for 2008 or later. but of course, ms can change his plans again and again...

I very much doubt that any new service packs will be released for Windows XP. At best you may get a hotfix rollup for XP SP2 at some point.

They may surprise us by releasing some tools for XP from Vista but that will only help the take up of new features on Vista, not to extend the life of Windows XP.

MS will be concentrating their efforts on Windows Vista for the next few months and maybe years so little time and effort will be expended on XP now.

Windows XP will become the "Windows 2000" of Windows family very quickly.

I predict the first Service Pack for Windows Vista in Q4 2007 or Q1 2008. MS may stop shipping new copies of Windows XP before then.

Kind Regards

Simon

first test with december version done. seems that can be removed:

KB911567

KB922760

for updates to .net 2, install it just after .net 3 doesn't work. at windows update, that updates for .net 2 are still there. but a restart maybe be needed in order to that updates work. anyway, if .net 2 is there, it can be done at once

Windows XP will become the "Windows 2000" of Windows family very quickly.

I predict the first Service Pack for Windows Vista in Q4 2007 or Q1 2008. MS may stop shipping new copies of Windows XP before then.

Kind Regards

Simon

IIRC, Windows XP originally had 5-year support commitment. It debuted October 25, 2001. Five years after that it was supposed to go into a long-term support mode for an additional 2 years, then 3 more years before product support gets pulled. Obviously that plan didn't work out and I don't recall how MS said they were going to support XP once Vista gets out. I senese XP becoming a "scapegoat" for Vista adoption-- all those technologies slated for Vista that were said to be backported to XP may never see the light of day (WinFS, et al if they ever are released). MS will probably end support for XP where it sees fit as long as a dollar is to be made; they'll Win2K it or worse.

I also was watching some of the video blogs from the project leaders of Vista. They suggested Vista may never have a "Service Pack" as we're accostomed to it (Updates & New Features). Vista's installation contains the minimum to get itself running on a PC and connected to the internet. This way vendors can send WHQLed drivers to MS via Microsoft Update; one consolidated place for all software & hardware updates. I hypothesize somewhere around the 2 year mark MS will do a SRP for Vista and re-RTM the OS for vendors (see XP Gold, XPSP1/a, XPSP2) - probably around the same time when Longhorn Server is introduced. I also believe MS will offer new technolgies for Vista progressively over the years and not bind those releases to the introduction of a Service Pack - as in Windows Firewall 2 in SP2.

Just my two cents.

don't know if is the correct topic to ask this question, sorry if i post in the wrong place, i'm new in autopatcher but i need some help.

i've just re-format my system and try to install the lite release of november/06 that i've downloaded, but i got this message after the autopatcher load the modules

'Module Panic on Windows Update v6

You are running Windows XP Professional Edition (Portuguese -- locale 1046) + IE6

Are you sure you downloaded the right release'

i don't get it. The FAQ on the autopatcher.com says that it will load on any windows version, showing only the included items (modules) witch match the running environment

i think that the core updates, like the securities update would match.

there's anything i can do to load the modules ?

i can't download another version cause i'm on a 56k dial-up connection now.

thanks in advance. :)

I'm afraid that although the AutoPatcher program will load on any locale of Windows, the specific releases are geared towards specific locales, in this case you've most probably downloaded an English release and it will, therefore, not work.

leandro m., i'm sorry pal, but there's no any official build for portuguese at this month. for brazilian portuguese, there's the mine, but it's unofficial.

by the way: if you have downloaded this version because of that description at superdownloads, forget about it. they don't have any clue about they are typing. an english release is intented to work in english versions of windows xp only. the same thing happends to other releases. yes, you can change locale to 1046 and it may work, but don't do it. you will do a great mess in your system.

tip: ask to a friend that have broadband download it for you or go to any cyber. it may helps.

i've read that description in the autopatcher official site, but now i saw here that isn't really any windows, only 'any english windows'.

actually i have access to broadband connection, but is in another city, i'd like to leave that computer here 'up to date', cause my sister uses it, and everytime i come back home stranger things happens to do system, well, next time i come back i fix that computer. ;)

thanks anyway :)

Hi,

xyz123, ms already had announce that sp3 will not arrive in 2007. so, you just may expect that for 2008 or later. but of course, ms can change his plans again and again...

I very much doubt that any new service packs will be released for Windows XP. At best you may get a hotfix rollup for XP SP2 at some point.........

Windows XP will become the "Windows 2000" of Windows family very quickly.

I predict the first Service Pack for Windows Vista in Q4 2007 or Q1 2008. MS may stop shipping new copies of Windows XP before then.....Simon

I agree with your analogy of XP becoming the next W2k. If MS decides to put off a service pack 3 for XP until sometime in 2008, and with mainstream support for XP expected to terminate in early 2009, then MS will probably decide not to issue a SP3 and do a "last minute / last rites" rollup update exactlyas they did with W2k. It's just not going to be a priority to issue a major service pack for XP. The difference being that service packs contain many, many more hotfixes and features which go through heavy quality control, where as a hotfix rollup contains much fewer patches and is minimalistic in nature, both quantity and quality. With the proximity of the expected SP3 release to date of termination mainstream support.... well... I wouldn't hold my breath for a SP3.

I thought they already confirmed that they were doing one?

Depends on what your definition of "confirmed" is. Yes, there are people at Microsoft working (as in mentally conceptualization and gathering of published hotfixes, etc.) on a SP3, and MS has let it be known that with all the hotfixes, patches, and other goodies released since the rollout of SP2, that it would seem logical to put together a SP3. However, they did EXACTLY the same thing as the sun set on Win2k mainstream support; promised a service pack, released a rollup update and told everyone to migrate to WinServer 2003 if you "really" want to make things better and "oh btw... we don't support win2k anymore"

It just doesn't make since from the viewpoint of corporate profit to expend valuable time and human resources in 2008 on a product, Win XP, you have slated for termination in 2009. It especially doesn't make since when you have a new and improved Vista package that is more secure, more bang for the consumer buck, and is rapidly gaining market / installed base in 2008.

Another mode of thinking with the lords of MS is that with the monthly releases of patches and fixes through MS update, why release any service packs at all? The delivery of critical security, important patches and new features through the update site, be they for XP or Vista should be more than sufficient for end user support. They believe that publishing Service Packs is simply duplication of effort after mainstreaming most fixes through automatic updates. I'd be surprised if there are ANY more Service Packs from MS, period.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!