Mac OS X 'Leopard'-related Discussion


Recommended Posts

If the Dock didn't create a reflection for the icons, then old icons would look perfectly fine. The three prime examples being:

picture42fc5d.pngpicture6a24e6.png

Transmit

picture5fd494.pngkeynoteadd2f.png

Keynote

picture338289.pngtrashbd8ee.png

Trash

These all look fine on the 3D Dock until that reflection is added.

When you are right you are right, but leave it to them not to see the obvious. They say Microsoft went overboard with Aero, Apple went overboard with reflections (coverflow included)

Coverflow perhaps the only one which really shows that Apple are not completely heartless. Instead of just ripping it off they decided to employee the guy that made it. Yeah I'm happy for him but what about the other developers?

Why should Apple (or any other company) purchase software that they could re-created better or cheaper by themselves?

Maybe im being too much of a sensationalist but has anyone else noticed the serious lack of quality thats going into Apple designs recently?

Prime Examples:

Leopard's Dock (making something already pretty cluttered..even more cluttered looking)

The "Plastic" Theme in general (wtf was wrong with 2nd revision Aqua anyway?)

iPod Nano 3g (aka Biggie Smalls)

i probably could cite more (like the iphone headphone jack/ipod 6g video output restrictions) but im just talking about aesthetics right now.

Apple is supposed to make stuff that looks good, works good, and ultimately makes you feel "comfortable" and the leopard interface changes are making customizablity worse (in some cases) and making the entire system define apple's Form over Function binge (if only the form was good enough to make up for the limited of function..)

anyway sorry for the rant but i needed to say it

Edit: spelling

I disagree, I think Leopard looks very nice, and the Dock is only as cluttered as you make it. On Tiger, my Dock has five permanent icons, everything else is quickly launched with QuickSilver.

And the 3G nano is quite beautiful, you need to see it up close to appreciate it.

Why should Apple (or any other company) purchase software that they could re-created better or cheaper by themselves?

It's unethical to call someone else's idea and product a feature of your own operating system. Why should I pay for Leopard to get features I already have and a GUI I can already recreate?

I wanted to see some compelling features not what we have received. Tiger from Panther was a great step up. The features it had like Spotlight were a big thing. Core Image was huge. I feel that Leopard doesn't offer a big enough step over Tiger to warrant a purchase when some of its biggest features are already available for Free from 3rd party developers.

But as I said above this is a very small part of my issue with Leopard. The majority of my problems with it come from the very poor design choices. The layout is good but the icons, interface colours, the menu bar, the dock and even the folders are very poor and look like something you would see on to be honest an Open Source Linux project that has just made some concept imagery for people to salivate over without actually thinking about the usage.

I do see some elements of what Vice is saying. You certainly can't look at a current Leopard desktop and not draw comparisons with Vista. Its perhaps more ironic for Apple to do that given that they've lambasted Microsoft for doing that to them for years.

I can't really say at this point whether i'll like Leopard. They do seem to have gone a bit nuts on the reflections etc but they're all minor GUI tweaks.. frankly i'm only interested in knowing how well the system runs, how functional it is, how well it all works.. i'm slowly finding myself using Windows less and less now that i've finally got a powerful enough Macintosh and i'm enjoying it and if Leopard helps smooth that transition even further then great.

There are some killer features and for me Time Machine is something you'd consider paying like $50 for.. so the the new, refreshed OS is easily worth an additional $79 on top of that.. I still see OSX as one of the best value operating systems on the market. If I could buy a Linux distro with the finish and polish of OSX, i'd pay $129 for it. As it is, there simply is not one out there. And this isn't intended as a dig at Linux as i've been using it now for 10 years.. I love it and I love how far it has come, but it just doesn't have the feel and ease of use that OSX does obviously.

I think the vastly improved Finder in Leopard alone may warrant a purchase. Yes, there are alternatives like Path Finder, but nothing beats having a powerful Finder built in. And even Path Finder doesn't work as seamlessly as the new Finder does when it comes to browsing local computers on your network. Unlike in Tiger, networked computers literally appear in Finder as if they were local external hard drives.

I do see some elements of what Vice is saying. You certainly can't look at a current Leopard desktop and not draw comparisons with Vista. Its perhaps more ironic for Apple to do that given that they've lambasted Microsoft for doing that to them for years.

I can't really say at this point whether i'll like Leopard. They do seem to have gone a bit nuts on the reflections etc but they're all minor GUI tweaks.. frankly i'm only interested in knowing how well the system runs, how functional it is, how well it all works.. i'm slowly finding myself using Windows less and less now that i've finally got a powerful enough Macintosh and i'm enjoying it and if Leopard helps smooth that transition even further then great.

There are some killer features and for me Time Machine is something you'd consider paying like $50 for.. so the the new, refreshed OS is easily worth an additional $79 on top of that.. I still see OSX as one of the best value operating systems on the market. If I could buy a Linux distro with the finish and polish of OSX, i'd pay $129 for it. As it is, there simply is not one out there. And this isn't intended as a dig at Linux as i've been using it now for 10 years.. I love it and I love how far it has come, but it just doesn't have the feel and ease of use that OSX does obviously.

You raise some really great points there. Mac OS X is good value for money when you consider the overall package. If your moving from another OS to Leopard that's great. I just cant see myself personally moving from Tiger to Leopard. If I was on Panther or Jaguar sure. Or even had a very old PPC Mac (G4 or lower Desktop or a G3 or lower Laptop) I would consider buying a new Mac after Leopard was released. I have to admit if Leopard runs a lot better then Tiger (For instance I know it has Dual Core optimisations for the first time it scales to more then 4 processors efficiently) then I'll simply have to switch as I have a Dual Core laptop and if the GUI is more responsive (Which I would really welcome) then maybe I can put the rest of my gripes behind.

And yes I agree $125 USD is a great price for Mac OS X especially compared to Windows Ultimate which is like 3x that price and in my opinion comes with the same if not less of a feature set. (Although I say the same about Vista to Tiger).

Well I will be buying it regardless. I've wanted a Mac for years and now i've got one I wanna actually enjoy paying for an OS upgrade, and be one of the people queueing at my closest Apple store on release day to see if I can score some freebies ;)

Totally underastand where you're coming from though. Its certainly not like Tiger is a bad system to be basing your upgrade decisions from.. Leopard is a pretty hard sell for someone already happy with their Tiger setup. But if you are, as you say, coming from a few versions back or from outside Mac ownership all together, it is a mighty tempting prospect.

I think the vastly improved Finder in Leopard alone may warrant a purchase. Yes, there are alternatives like Path Finder, but nothing beats having a powerful Finder built in. And even Path Finder doesn't work as seamlessly as the new Finder does when it comes to browsing local computers on your network. Unlike in Tiger, networked computers literally appear in Finder as if they were local external hard drives.

I have a feeling that the Finder isn't much improved. I think it will still beach ball of death every so often and is still relatively non-functional compared to Path Finder (which is too big and bloated). I was hoping Apple would make a happy medium between the two. There's at least a few components I'd like to see fixed in the Finder.

IMO, one of the desktops that I see as having the most potential but falls abit on execution is Enlightenment DR17. I think there are some components there that Apple could use. Heck, I was trying it out on my only PC ... PII 300 and a 32 MB ATI card and it flies! If only my iMac G5 could do as much with 3 times the resources ....!

Overall, there's enough in Leopard to have me upgrade to the new OS - it'll make for a nice MP3 server. I'll put it next to my stereo system. I'm not sure about hardware. I'm waiting to see if they're still willing to release a cheaper Mac Pro ... or if I make enough $$$ in the next 6 months to budget for a Mac Pro.

Also about Apple locking down stuff in the OS. It's my opinion that they shouldn't be locking down anything. Anything in the OS can be used incorrectly to create an unstable environment if your going to sell me Milk let me see the Cow it came from.

In that case use Linux. Apple offers an OS that is secure and can't be compromised by any random 3rd party application that likes to use system frameworks beyond their original purpose.

Like I said earlier Mac OS X Leopard will have enough public frameworks that can be used for advanced animations for user interfaces without hacking into critical system processes.

If the Dock didn't create a reflection for the icons, then old icons would look perfectly fine. The three prime examples being:

picture42fc5d.pngpicture6a24e6.png

Transmit

picture5fd494.pngkeynoteadd2f.png

Keynote

picture338289.pngtrashbd8ee.png

Trash

These all look fine on the 3D Dock until that reflection is added.

ahh - now that you've pointed that out, thats really annoying. Do you think they will be changing that?? surely they can't leave it like that??

im starting to get the feeling it will be like vista and will end up being a "work in progress"

I honestly can't be too bothered about the Dock reflection. Overal the Finder and applications look great and polished.

^ but usually apple has been known for detail and thats what makes it a great looking product. Paying attention to detail.

And they did. Basically every icon has updated 16x16, 32x32, 256x256 and 512x512 pixel states where they paid great attention to detail. Basically all applications have been redesigned to share the same Unified look and window layout. The overal UI is much more polished and consistant than Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger has been the past 2,5 years.

The Leopard UI is more consistent, but not more polished, it looks far "cheaper" than Tiger did. Now Neo will most definitely disagree with me and some others will too, but comparing them side by side you will notice the difference in quality. Granted its not a train wreck or anything, but it definitely shows someone different is working on its GUI this time around. As for the statement regarding it being like Vista, thats a bit much, Leopard will be a prime OS as far as functionality and programs go, its GUI will be the work in progress imo. I like the direction they are going but they didn't quite make it yet and it certainly shows. Only downside is Apple has never really updated the theme of a Mac OS release, so don't count on it changing much until 10.6, but its very obvious whoever is doing the new work isn't as critical for every fine detail as the previous designer was. Pixel perfectionists will be upset by this, but the average person won't. I just hope they finish the resolution independence as that was one feature I was really looking forward to.

Btw the new nano is quite nice in person, in pictures especially dead on, it looks terrible, like a big crappy photoshop bevel, in your hand its quite different.

And simxx17, welcome to the team in October, I'm picking myself up a nice fully loaded 24" iMac once Leopard is released. Coming from Windows your going to love the Mac OS, best OS I've ever used, Linux might be more advanced (as they would say) but Mac OS is far far more user friendly. Just remember to make your "shortname" with capitals as you can't change it (easily), and you see it in every finder window, just a little pet peeve of mine.

i dont know about resolution independence coming in a patch update... its not very often a 10.x.x update brings features in..

that being said i dont use the resolution independence features of vista so i dont really care but just my feeling is that this feature might not be coming

vista doesn't have resolution independent features as far as i know, and i auto-hide my dock and rarely use it so im not really muffed with it ... using spotlight to launch apps is easy, so the dock has been kinda useless for me since 10.4

will i upgrade to leopard? heck yes ... at least we don't have a vista on our hands. if anything is left 'unpolished' its probably because of the time it took to make os x resolution independent.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • BrowserOS 0.46.0 by Razvan Serea BrowserOS is a free, open-source Chromium-based browser that runs AI agents natively, offering a smarter, more productive browsing experience. It supports Chrome extensions and integrates AI agents to automate tasks, fill forms, and streamline workflows. Your data stays on your computer: you can use your own API keys or run local models via Ollama, making it a privacy-first alternative to tools like Perplexity, Comet, or Dia. With built-in productivity tools and app integrations, BrowserOS boosts efficiency while keeping control firmly in your hands. Being Chromium-based, BrowserOS lets you effortlessly import your bookmarks, passwords, and Chrome extensions in just a few clicks. BrowserOS works with OpenAI GPT models, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and local AI models via Ollama or LMStudio. You can use your own API keys and effortlessly switch between providers. BrowserOS Agent Your AI productivity assistant that organizes and manages your browsing effortlessly Quickly list, group, or close tabs Save and resume browsing sessions Search your history and organize bookmarks Switch instantly to the tab you need BrowserOS Navigator – Automate web tasks with ease Navigate websites and search automatically Interact with pages without manual effort Handle repetitive tasks in seconds What makes BrowserOS special Feels like home - same familiar interface as Google Chrome, works with all your extensions AI agents that run on YOUR browser, not in the cloud Privacy first - bring your own keys or use local models with Ollama. Your browsing history stays on your computer Open source and community driven - see exactly what's happening under the hood MCP store to one-click install popular MCPs and use them directly in the browser bar (coming soon) Built-in AI ad blocker that works across more scenarios! BrowserOS 0.46.0 changelog: Run Claude Code & Codex right in your browser — We've extended the agent harness to bring full coding agents into BrowserOS. Claude Code and Codex now come bundled and plug straight into the assistant, so you can drive your browser with the agent — and the subscription — you already use. A brand new experience — A redesigned new tab, a calmer composer, and a rebuilt command center for switching between agents. The whole assistant is cleaner, faster to reach, and easier to live in. New MCP tools — We rebuilt the browser tool surface from the ground up — a tighter, more reliable set of tools for agents to drive the browser. Plus one-click install of BrowserOS as an MCP server into the agents you already run, with automatic URL sync. Chromium 148 — Updated to the latest Chromium base with all recent upstream fixes and security patches. Streamlined — We've pulled back a few features that weren't getting much use — Skills, Soul, and Memory — so we can focus and ship better versions of them soon. Download: BrowserOS 0.46.0 | 181.0 MB (Open Source) Download: BrowserOS for macOS | 485.0 MB Links: BrowserOS Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      590
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!