Mac OS X 'Leopard'-related Discussion


Recommended Posts

Hm.. well i'm all installed and up and running.

Actually its not blowing me away quite how I hoped it would. I appreciate my Mac Mini is on the 'low end' of the hardware ladder for Apple but things like the magnify effect on dock are now stuttery slow where they were smooth in Tiger (thanks to the pointless reflections I guess) though I already do like some features that have become obvious.

I suppose I should just get cracking with it and see how it appeals after a few weeks!

Is it still indexing? It usually takes a few hours after the initial install to get it at full speed.

Did a clean install (totally wiped my system disk ready) - thinking that the 2D dock might be a better idea but it seems a shame given that its one of Leopards prettiest features! :)

I'm on a MBP and the 3D dock does feel sluggish, they need to do some optimization on it.

I guess wait for 10.5.1. Although the Dock works fine for me. I've even customized it a bit, I've replaced the white glass with black glass.

I'm on a MBP and the 3D dock does feel sluggish, they need to do some optimization on it.

I'm on a 2.0GHz MBP and my dock feels snappy. The only thing that's a tiny bit jumpy is the expansion of a stack of my Applications folder into a grid.

Hmm, thats probably a really good idea. I've got an upgrade install and 10.5.1 would be a great opportunity to do a clean install and fix a considerable amount of bugs, anyone have any idea what kind of timeframe we expect for 10.5.1? Maybe we'll get a lesslaggy iTunes as well :o

Hmm, thats probably a really good idea. I've got an upgrade install and 10.5.1 would be a great opportunity to do a clean install and fix a considerable amount of bugs, anyone have any idea what kind of timeframe we expect for 10.5.1? Maybe we'll get a lesslaggy iTunes as well :o

i just don't understand all the issues you are getting, everything is running flawlessly for me.

i just don't understand all the issues you are getting, everything is running flawlessly for me.

Same here. Save for some minor UI glitches and some fluidity in the UI functions (Dashboard and Dock animations), I haven't seen anything alarming whatsoever. A huge contrast to 10.4.0, from what I can see.

Actually having spent a few hours using it now, magnification of the dock is the only slower thing i've noticed. Everything else (especially Safari!) seems to be fairly speedy - even a little quicker than Tiger in fact.. which is nice :)

I'm on a MacBook 2.16GHz with 2GB of RAM and I get lag with the 3D Dock, plus I think it looks crap, 2D dock is far better for work flow.

How does a different look change your workflow? It still does the same thing. If you complained about how Stacks changed the way folders worked, then you would be making sense.

Has anyone found performance from external (USB) drives to be... slow? I'm trying to copy my iTunes folder back from a FAT32 volume and its taking an eternity for something that is only a few GB in size!

How does a different look change your workflow? It still does the same thing. If you complained about how Stacks changed the way folders worked, then you would be making sense.

Very hard to explain, I just find the 2D dock with it's square boarder makes things far more centred and clean, but with the 3D dock things are almost like some Windows shortcuts thrown in on the bottom of the screen with true direction. BAH, very hard to explain, but I find the 2D dock looking more professional and clean, thus it improves my productivity.

Alright, with all the Leopard talk, I had to take the plunge. I'm fully operational after a clean install and, I must say, I don't notice any real speed difference versus a year-old Tiger installation. However, my biggest surprise is the new implementation of Spotlight. I don't know what they did, but searches are instant! Besides that though, Front Row (aka Apple TV) looks like rubbish, the dock needed to be heavily modded to be usable, and the damn transparent menu is god-awful annoying. I'm using LeoColorBar now with a black background so the bar appears brushed metal and matches the rest of the operating system. Although, I really would like my wasted blurring/transparency GPU cycles back.

All in all, moderately impressed, but definitely not worth $130.

Oh, and why do the menus have round corners? It just makes them look gaudy.

Leopard runs great on my powerbook G4 1.67GHz. The only thing I noticed to be faster in Tiger than Leopard on my machine is spotlight. Any ideas on why this is happening or how I can speed it up?

If you just installed it, give it a couple hours to index your drive. That's why it seems slow right now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!