God or god -> do you capitalize God/god?


Do you capitalize God/god?  

212 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you capitalize God/god?

    • God - I do it religiously
      85
    • God - I do it because it accepted, but dont belive in God
      67
    • god
      60


Recommended Posts

I personally find it a bit insulting as agnostic/atheist to be forced to capitalize god.

you cant be both. if your wavering then your agnostic.

It seems to infer that god does exist

it infers that it is the name of something, that something could well be the 'idea' of God being a 'being'.

And to the inevitable 'get over it' or 'what diffrence does it make', it does. Its no different from using the N***** word, after all those are just letters right?

no, those letters have meanings attached, just as god does.

if you said n***** you'd be insulting someone, if you said God with a capital you'd just be saying you believe that god is a being that has the capacity for a name.

I personally am agnostic and I do capitalize God becuase it is a name.

It depends on the context in which I use the word... Referring to an Abrahamic god, I do it to indicate that it is an Abrahamic god (e.g. Yahweh, God, Allah, ...) In general, no; I've never seen anyone write it as, say, "Zeus was a Greek God" (I don't know if he was or wasn't ;)).

Good question.

Yes, I do capitalize it; but that's because my English teachers always me so. Plus, there's a religious factor as well.

Why?

Because.

He said it's a grammar rule...how's he supposed to explain to you why.

It's the same as capitalizing the first letter in the names of countries and names...and religions and prophets, etc...

  • 6 years later...

Holy baloney!  What a thread bump!

 

 

I find it rather frustrating to be required to write god in a manner that betrays my personal beliefs.

 

Such like I find it frustrating to be required to write the Big Bang theory is the absolute truth, but that is very much in doubt.

 

It's a title, therefore should be capitalised.  As has said before, grammar is all.

If Im referring to the Christian god "God" then yes I do, because it's the name of that god. I'm im referring to other deities as gods, I don't capitalise it.

 

Yup, my sentiments exactly. 

I personally find it a bit insulting as agnostic/atheist to be forced to capitalize god. It seems to infer that god does exist, but every time I hand in a paper to a professor where I do not capitalize it, they mark it up. I find it rather frustrating to be required to write god in a manner that betrays my personal beliefs.

And to the inevitable 'get over it' or 'what diffrence does it make', it does. Its no different from using the N***** word, after all those are just letters right?

akk my poll didn't attach!

I dont see how that betrays your beliefs if you havent got any. Your an atheist, so why would it matter how you write it. And the reason its with a capital, is because its not just a word, he is the one and only and thats what God is called by.

But why? Isn't the christian god originated from the jewish believes, where his name is yahw (or something like that)?

 

edit: Google says it's "Yahweh".

I have no idea, it's not something I've ever looked into or had any interest in but Christians call him God, so that's what I'll call him :P

Either, it depends on the the message I'm try to convey. I feel that being offended is just finding offense to find offense (if you are looking for offense, you'll always find it in life unfortunately). I feel similarly for the following things: "bless you", "God bless you", "Merry Christmas". If folks are being cordial, why be offended by what they say even if you don't believe as they do?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
    • >Improved system sounds when using Windows in dark mode. The story behind that bug would be an interesting one.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      442
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      200
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!