Canadians don't shop online


Recommended Posts

No thanks, just browsing, online shoppers say

MARINA STRAUSS

Globe and Mail Update

Canadians are trailblazers when it comes to banking and paying bills online. They're even comfortable buying concert tickets and booking travel.

But when it comes to snapping up a kettle or a cardigan, they've been slow to embrace virtual shopping. They tend to do the research on the Web and then head to the mall to make the purchase.

The paradox emerges in a study by New York research firm EMarketer, which called the phenomenon the Canadian conundrum.

?In recent years, Canadian e-commerce has stagnated in something of a ?chicken or egg' situation,? the study says.

?Canadian online shoppers complain that Web retailers are not serious about selling on their websites,? said EMarketer, which analyzed data from several reports. ?Meanwhile, retailers feel that too few Canadians are shopping online to justify the costs of operating an online store or doing it well.?

Duncan McKie, president of market researcher Pollara Inc. in Toronto, sa big deterrent for Canadian consumers is the time it takes and the high cost of getting Internet purchases delivered delIf you've got to wait three, four or five days for something you can walk out and purchase in a mall ? what's the point?9;s the point??They want it nowThey want it now.?

The problem stems from the comparatively expensive and underdeveloped systems in Canada to move goods from Web retailer to customer, he said. In contrast, U.S. e-tailers have found the economies of scale to provide free, 24-hour shipping, especially during the cruciDuring the current shopping rush, a recent Pollara survey found, about two-thirds of U.S. consumers will shop online; in Canada, shoppers will make purchases on the Internet at only half that rate, Mr. McKie said. Mr. McKie said.

Many retailers in Canada haven't exactly raced to provide extensive online shopping, said Jeffrey Grau, senior analyst at EMarketer, who wrote the report on Canadian e-commerce. They're content to sell through their stores and don't want the technical headaches of running a website. They don't want the costly challenges of marketing in two languages and shipping to geographically dispersed customers.

?Some large retailers have neglected their websites,? Mr. Grau said, pointing to weak website designs and functionality. They have trouble tracking orders and meeting delivery deadlines, he said. And they have limited selections.

Amazon.ca, for example, offers a much narrower array of products than its U.S. counterpart, while department store retailer Hudson's Bay Co. has a smaller range of merchandise online than in its outlets, the EMarketer report says.

Heavyweight discounter Wal-Mart Canada Corp. has no e-commerce at all, despite the popularity of its online shopping site in the United States. Its U.S. e-shop does not ship outside that country. And clothier Gap Inc., with stores under its own, Old Navy and Banana Republic banners, is also without an online buying site in Canada, even though it has more than 230 outlets in this country.

Andrew Pelletier, a spokesman for Wal-Mart Canada, said it is planning to offer e-commerce, and in the meantime has one of the country's most visited informational websites. ?Ultimately we would rather be right, than fast.? Few, if any, general merchandisers provide a complete online product selection, he said.

?Canadians generally want a very broad assortment of choices to draw from in all of their shopping channels,? he said. ?Perhaps the lack of this expansive assortment online is one of the reasons Canadian customers have not yet embraced e-commerce quite as quickly as their American counterparts.?

Gap also is exploring e-commerce in Canada and, for now, has a ?pre-shop? website to browse, said spokeswoman Tara Wickwire. The global merchant will not conduct e-business internationally until it is sure it can deliver the level of service that customers expect of its brands, she said.

Still, the report said Canada's e-commerce market is gaining momentum. Considerably more Canadians plan to buy gifts online this holiday season than last year, and a number of chains have launched online stores recently. Even fine jewellery purveyors Tiffany & Co. and Henry Birks & Sons Inc. have an e-commerce presence.

And Sears Canada Inc. has set an example for other major retailers, the report says. Last year it teamed up with Amazon to refashion its site. Even so, Sears' online sales are just an estimated $175-million of the retailer's total annual $6-billion.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/sto...Technology/home

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/524078-canadians-dont-shop-online/
Share on other sites

Well if the price of shipping to Canada was lower and if the fear of customs kicking you in the arse when they charge you 30% more wasn't there, I'd buy off ebay more often.

And as to buying off retailer's e-stores, it's not as advanced (or not even existent) as the American counterparts, so no one really cares.

Why buy something and wait for it to come when you can get up off your lazy a*s and buy it and bring it home.

That idea inspired this poll:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...=524080&st=

I bought everything in-store this year.

I only do a bit of online shopping - the occasional purchase from Play.com and eBay and that's it. Everything else I go out of my way to buy in the stores. At least you can check the condition of the goods instore - when it gets delivered, you only know whether it's in perfect working order when you unwrap everything, and it can be a pain to return to get a replacement. And if you discover something is missing in the box after you buy the product instore, it's just a case of showing them the receipt and you'll get your part.

Online is just easier and cheaper. I guess i'm just better at anticipating my needs than Canadians, so I dont have to rush out and get things :whistle:

*Warning* may be an attempt to wind up the Canadian posters in this thread.. ;) :shifty:

I don't find it cheaper or easier. You have to wait and hope that it arrives correctly. It's a bit like gambling.

Plus, you have to pay for shipping (even when they offer "free" shipping, the shipping cost is just bundled into the item price).

I just like getting the item the same day and knowing that if it doesn't work correctly I can get it exchanged easily.

(even when they offer "free" shipping, the shipping cost is just bundled into the item price).

Anyone who's ever done any price comparisons knows this is just not true. Frequently stuff costs less online than in stores, while still offering free shipping if you spend a certain amount.

Anyone who's ever done any price comparisons knows this is just not true. Frequently stuff costs less online than in stores, while still offering free shipping if you spend a certain amount.

FutureShop charges the same, online or in-store. The same is true, as far as I can tell, from Chapters/Indigo.

That idea inspired this poll:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...=524080&st=

I bought everything in-store this year.

Same, the only thing I bought online was my laptop and that wasn't because I was lazy or anything, it's only because Dell is not available as a retailer store. Even going to a Dell direct store requires the same things you would use at home to buy online (They pretty much just make an online order for you over there.)

I mean, honestly, I am out most of the time so if I need anything I can just get it on my way.

I usually purchase in-store, simply because I want to have it NOW :p

I purchase online when I don't need it so soon (usually computer parts from Newegg, or car electronics from Crutchfield), or if I can't find it in any shops around here, or if the deal online is just that good that it would be stupid to buy it in-store.

But I'm not Canadian, so it doesn't really matter :laugh:

When I want something, I want it now. If I have 30min of bus to make to get something now, it's better than pay shipping (if applicable) and wait until tomorrow...

Only PC Parts, this is different, PC stores don't usually hold stock and buying online come interesting but even there, I pay for express shipping... :whistle:

I usually purchase in-store, simply because I want to have it NOW :p

I purchase online when I don't need it so soon (usually computer parts from Newegg, or car electronics from Crutchfield), or if I can't find it in any shops around here, or if the deal online is just that good that it would be stupid to buy it in-store.

But I'm not Canadian, so it doesn't really matter :laugh:

You can be, it's as easy as applying for immigration and moving here. Then you can join the dark side :shifty: (and our fuutre plans to take over the south :devil:) Not that anything could happen :whistle:

I don't find it cheaper or easier. You have to wait and hope that it arrives correctly. It's a bit like gambling.

How is it gambling if online shopping is so successful? It's gambling if you're talking about DOA but as far as receiving the package itself, the company really have to sucks and to be a screwjob to pull this one out. That's why you got sites like bizrate that lets customers review these online stores.

It's gambling if you're not careful when buying online and not using your judgement and get screwed, that's your fault because not every store in town is perfect either.

Yes, there are arguments on how you don't save that much to shop online versus in-store but the selection is much more wide online that you can find anything you need without moving your ass. The best example I use is cellphones and computer hardware. For cellphones, well we always buy unlocked phones for obvious reasons but as far as computers go, whenever I go in a computer store to purchase something, they say they have to "order it from the warehouse" in a way of avoiding restocking fees. Anywho, it takes them as long to receive as it takes me to receive parts from ncix.com which is located in Vancouver, always between 2 to 4 business days.

If I see the same item in-store and online and the prices is just a bit cheaper online, if course I'll buy it in-store and get the item now but the reason I buy online is either

1) I can't find it in stores

2) The price is significantly cheaper

And it happens many times that either of the above pushes me to buy something online.

How is it gambling if online shopping is so successful? It's gambling if you're talking about DOA but as far as receiving the package itself, the company really have to sucks and to be a screwjob to pull this one out. That's why you got sites like bizrate that lets customers review these online stores.

It's gambling if you're not careful when buying online and not using your judgement and get screwed, that's your fault because not every store in town is perfect either.

I was specifically thinking of DOA or wrong item shipments. What a hassle it would be to have to send it back and wait again. Who would pay for the shipping back to the company? Who would pay for the shipping back to you again?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft today announced a new endeavor that aims to make it simpler for Godot developers to get their products into the Xbox PC ecosystem. Dubbed the "XBOX Godot Sample," this is a new public reference for developers using the open-source engine. This is set to serve as an example of how Microsoft GDK, Xbox Services, and PlayFab can be integrated into their projects. The sample is available now on GitHub as a working example. This covers key features in gaming projects that developers may need to release their projects on Xbox PC, with everything from matchmaking and game sign-in to gamepad compatibility with Godot being covered. This release is being called the first step in giving Godot developers the tools to bring their games over to Xbox PC, with more changes to come based on feedback and issue reports. However, the company was clear that this is not related to bringing Godot projects to Xbox consoles. The engine's open development model stops it from accessing console SDKs due to the requirement of NDAs and legal contracts. Here's how it explained this Godot sample project's focus: This is a source-only sample, not a product. It's MIT-licensed at the wrapper layer; the GDK and PlayFab dependencies still require their own installs and license acceptance, consistent with our other XBOX samples. There is no set update cadence for support or maintenance. We’ll watch the repo, monitor issues, and iterate where it makes sense, but this isn't a commercial release. That said, we’re excited to hear your feedback and see any community PRs, as we evolve this together. This is the first step in bringing Godot for XBOX on PC. We plan to evolve it over time based on what the community tells us is most valuable. This sample is built specifically for XBOX on PC. It doesn’t include support for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One. If you’re already building for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One, please talk with your XBOX representative. If not, you can get started by signing up here. Game developers can find the XBOX Godot Sample by heading to GitHub over here. Documentation on how to get started with Godot for building an Xbox PC project can be seen here.
    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • It is notable that around 70% of web browser users choose Google Chrome. However, it is puzzling why anyone on Windows would opt for Chrome when Microsoft Edge is often superior in many aspects and comes pre-installed. Edge collects less data, uses less RAM, and is more optimized for Windows as a native Microsoft product. While some may point to bloat in Edge, much of it can be removed with simple tools, requiring no more effort than installing Chrome. Meanwhile, Chrome reportedly downloads large amounts of AI data (4 GB) without explicit consent. I'm sure you Chrome users love that, or? Here is one example of a tool that doesn't even need to be installed to be able to use: https://github.com/TheBobPony/MSEdgeTweaker Although Microsoft’s aggressive promotion of Edge may be questionable, the browser’s current advantages make it a preferable choice over Chrome today, even if Chrome may have been better in the past.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!