How much do Mac parts really cost?


Recommended Posts

you are WAY off on the motherboard... you cant just slap a generic one in there thats an EFI motherboard which you cant even buy right now as a stand alone part... its a custom Intel EFI board based on the 945 or 975 chipset, dependent on if you are buying now or last year and what tier you buy at aka mac or mac pro, xserve...etc ... it costs apple about $350 a board from Intel...

Apple doesn't sell individual components to build their computers, they just sell computers, like Dell and HP. Why would you compare a bunch of parts to a fully assembled car, then claim the parts are a better buy?

I'm pretty sure the Mac Pro's motherboard uses an Intel 945 chipset. It's not as proprietory as you think.

its more then you think, its a custom made EFI board that intel and apple designed together, it's not a standard off the shelf OEM board

You bring up one or two good points, but if you watch the revelation of the Mac Pro, you'll notice that the specs are clearly designed to be able to let you customize the computer in a lot of different ways. Many of the items that you use in your computer do not match up to the Mac hardware, for example Xeon vs. Core 2 Duo, and IDE vs. SATA. The Mac hardware uses higher standard hardware and manufacturing; while the average user could use your computer and be quite happy with it, the average user is not a "pro". Try and do a little more research if you do a revised copy, and I'll be able to agree with you. I use a Mac because I like the hardware and higher standard of it, and because Mac Os X is, in my personal opinion, better than Windows XP. Windows Vista might give it some good competition.

Please, take my advice and use it; you won't convince me to go back to a PC, but with more factual information, you could easily convince me that Macs cost more.

Nice try.

Well Apple has to make money somehow. If its too pricey don't buy it. Welcome to capitalism. To me Apple is way overpriced for the hardware that you get. Thats why I run OSX 10.4.8 on my Compaq Presario V2000 . I rather buy my own hardware and install OSX on it.

heres a nice deal for you:

you know... companys make profit. thats how everything here works. if you dont like it, you do have an option:

build a time machine (see the "haha"?) and go back to the 50s. travel to the sovjet union and there you go.

no, sorry, that was bad.

of course apple hardware is expensive. but there is one thing you should never forget:

the hardware is built around the OS and not vice versa, you dont put the OS on a prebuilt hardware.

with an apple you get the all-in-one-package. you get the support, you get 110% supported hardware,

you get design (which of course it a matter of taste), you get the OS, which runs, as implied by something said before,

110% supported by the hardware and you get, if you decide to go pro, the option of upgrading.

people who buy macs, sorry for the bit of black and white painting, usually actually HAVE the money to afford

something all-in-one like this, because they need something that really works 100% flawlessly for their work

or something.

and all the people out there owning a mac where willing to pay a bit more for what actually is offered by the

apple corp.

but thats just my pov.

* Two 2GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon "Woodcrest" processors

* 1GB memory (667MHz DDR2 fully-buffered DIMM ECC)

* NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT graphics with 256MB memory

* 160GB Serial ATA 3Gb/s 7200-rpm hard drive1

* 16x double-layer SuperDrive

ummm 1st. its Two 2GHz Dual Core Intel Xeons. You only have one, 2nd the memory cost so much more because its fully buffered + ECC. There is always money made on computers. Go price out a basic Dell Quad Core workstation. I'm sure it will cost you about the same as a entry Mac Pro.

Well Apple has to make money somehow. If its too pricey don't buy it. Welcome to capitalism. To me Apple is way overpriced for the hardware that you get. Thats why I run OSX 10.4.8 on my Compaq Presario V2000 . I rather buy my own hardware and install OSX on it.

you probaly soulden't talk about running OS X on PC's, pretty sure its against the rules here because it's against Apples agreements.

PS: I'm pretty sure the Mac Pro uses a 5000-series chipset, not some 945 junk.

You're probably right, I just remember hearing about how the 945 mobos support EFI and are running on a BIOS layer, I don't remember where I heard the connection to current Macs.

It's not hard to notice he chose the cheapest PC components ever, and then he says that the Mac is more expensive... Ok..

Cephas comparison is A LOT more accurate, but you still cannot really compare apples and oranges, they both have different components. Some, like the processor and maybe the DVD write are the same though.

Grab Apple's 10-Q or 10-K filing that they turn an average of 30% profit on their hardware. If they're sacrificing margin on the low-price gear it will have to be made up by selling more expensive kit with a higher margin in order to maintain that gross margin.

No need for all the fancy guess work and approximating to work out how much Apple is taking above-and-beyond the cost of sales for every system sold.

It's not that I don't know I'm paying a premium, it's just that I don't care. I bought a computer as a solution to a collection of problems, I value the quality of that solution, not the little bits of metal and plastic that from the most obvious part of it. Saving a few bucks (even a few hundred) isn't worth the hassle of hobbling together a PC from pieces out of the parts bin, getting an OS—that doesn't run the software I want to use—on it, and then playing tech support for the whole mess if anything goes wrong.

There's also something to be said about not having an eye-sore in the office.

mind you the CD reading and writing (R not RW) on the "SuperDrive" is only 32X instead of the standard for the past half decade of 48-52X but that?s ok
We have had 48x-52x cd burning for half a decade?, my cd burner i got 2 years ago maxes out at 32x (although it can read at 48x)

Must have been a old burner when i brought it:rolleyes:s:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!