• 0

Definitive Best Antivirus 2007


Definitive Best Antivirus  

1407 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • [url=http://www.avira.com/]Antivir[/url]
      43
    • [url=http://www.avast.com/]Avast![/url]
      118
    • [url=http://www.grisoft.com/]AVG[/url]
      159
    • [url=http://www.bitdefender.com/]BitDefender[/url]
      21
    • [url=http://www.clamwin.com/]ClamWin[/url]
      5
    • [url=http://www.f-secure.com/]F-Secure[/url]
      13
    • [url=http://www.kaspersky.com/]Kaspersky[/url]
      258
    • [url=http://www.mcafee.com/]McAfee[/url]
      35
    • [url=http://www.eset.com/]NOD32[/url]
      581
    • N/A
      174
  2. 2. Your Choice?

    • [url=http://www.symantec.com/]Norton[/url]
      85
    • [url=http://www.pandasoftware.com/]Panda[/url]
      21
    • [url=http://www.sophos.com/]Sophos[/url]
      17
    • [url=http://www.symantec.com/]Symantec (Corporate)[/url]
      114
    • [url=http://www.trendmicro.com/]Trend[/url]
      38
    • [url=http://www.anti-virus.by/en/]VBA32[/url]
      7
    • [url=http://www.windowsonecare.com/]Windows Onecare[/url]
      83
    • [url=http://www.zonelabs.com/store/content/catalog/products/sku_list_zaav.jsp?dc=1]Zone[/url]
      49
    • Other (Please specify below)
      71
    • N/A
      922


Question

A fresh "Best Antivirus" poll for 2007. Please use this as a reference when researching antivirus utilities. As time goes on, the poll can be updated to add further options.

Due to limitations of IPB - this will be seen as 2 polls. Select the Antivirus program you wish to vote for, and choose N/A in the other poll.

Happy voting!

Poll choices are links to the software pages.

Edited by Joel
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/526708-definitive-best-antivirus-2007/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

For People who says that A is better, B is better, please let us know as well, why you think it's better, so you can help other people :)

I'll go with Avast, just because it's free and catch all of viruses so far in my computer/email

  • 0

I think in terms in detection rate, Kaspersky is the best, but I prefer NOD32, even though it has a somewhat lower detection rate. I've used version 5 of KAV for a few months, and then the version 6 trial, but I found that it tends to cause some lag sometimes, especially in a directory full of many or large files.

NOD32 just happily runs in the background and I never notice it, until I get a popup about a completed update.

I still voted for Kaspersky though :p

  • 0

Crap name, great software. Trend Micro "PC-Cillin" Internet Security 2007. I've used Trend in various different guises since 1997 and it just gets better and better.

NO problems at all. Plus as I'm a beta tester (have been for the last 5 years) I get it for nowt. But I'd pay for it, too.

Free Anti Virus has got to be Avast!, hands down. Solid as a rock, reliable. And Free :)

  • 0

Many great posts from the previous thread should be included in this one because they were unbiased and very informative. Ghost96 made the best replies I had seen in ages.

http://av-comparatives.org

Best payware:

- Kaspersky (detection rate, update frequency)

- NOD32 (stability, memory usage)

Best freeware:

- AntiVir (detection rate)

- Avast

Regardless, nothing beats the human brain. If you have good knowledge on how to maintain a secure system and use computer sense, your need for an anti-virus software will vary. I'm currently using NOD32 and don't usually have it running unless I intend on scanning something I download, which is the only reason I use it. If I were to become massively infected (which never happens because I'm not naive or stupid) I wouldn't try to disinfect my system, I would just use my Acronis Rescue Media Boot CD to restore my system with an image file saved on my second HDD. Anything personal I keep in password-protection 7-Zip archives until I burn it to CD/DVD for safe-keeping (so my personal info/files are never compromised). I'm behind a DI-604 Router which I feel is pretty locked down. I use Opera with Java and scripting disabled. I use POP3 for e-mail through the Opera Mail Client. My G-Mail is imported into it from the actual site, then deleted from the site and saved onto my HDD where I can easily and quickly delete anything I don't want (I don't get spam/junk mail anyway). I have an nLited Windows XP Corporate SP2 installation where common exploitable components and EXEs are removed (which don't break any core OS functionality or anything I use). I use mostly open-source and freeware software and try to keep the number of programs installed as minimal as I can, which isn't directly related to staying secure, but it helps. And as I said, computer sense is crucial.

You could also use a second machine (old or new) and put Linux on it and have your network traffic filtered through that I imagine. I've personally never done it myself.

As long as you follow those general guidelines, you shouldn't ever have anything to worry about.

It's unfortunate that there are hundreds of millions of users out there who don't take such precautions, are naive, think they are invincible, don't understand how things work in the computer world, don't care, take things for granted, etc... and they complain that their OS or PC sucks or is slow, strange 1 minute calls to dozens of wherever-places show on their phone bill, a charge for a $5000 auction item on eBay shows on their VISA, everyone on their MSN contacts list received a message stating they want to have sexual relations with them and then are blocked and deleted, but not before all of them received a trojan horse download, and finally their system becomes unbootable. Yeah, it's really unfortunate...

Well, that's my two cents.

  • 0

NOD32 is the best of all the antivirus I've used. Kaspersky was not bad but is so much slower, not only with scanning but when you move several files around it takes a lot longer with Kaspersky running the background scan than it does with NOD32. I found NOD32 to be less hassle, I could leave it to do its thing.

  • 0

I have used Trend for years and it has never let me down in any of the areas that it covers. I have never been without protection, and it catches absolutely everything, both virus and malware that I have gotten. Plus the easy beta testing they provide really helps for?suggesting?options?and?relating?problems?directly?to?the?developers.

For free A/V though, I'd have to go with AVG free. Not quite as good IMHO, but still great considering it is free?:)d?small :)

  • 0

NOD32 is a great AV software. I switched from Symantec Norton to NOD32 and I am very happy. Symantec and Kaspersky both use up alot of resource and both are expensive software compare to the NOD32. For both Kaspersky and Symantec one year is about $70. But with Nod32 two years is $40. The new verison of NOD32 (Version 3.0) will come with a firewall coming this Feburary.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have never been a huge fan of libre, it feels really good but exactly when you need an advance feature for data wrangling it falls short every time or has bugs. I am all for euro office if they can deliver a good and usable alternative to MS office with backing of govt function.
    • Go on, I'll bite. How does windows (nice comment on an 'article' which doesn't actually involve it ) lock users out of their data then? Been using it since 3.1 back in 92 and not once have I been locked out of my data? Perhaps you mean Bitlocker? In which case the average user (who doesn't mess about) will have been forced to use a MSA, and in which case the recovery key would have been saved to said account..... If the user did happen to bodge around and not use an MSA then Bitlocker wouldn't have become live (as it cannot without a safe place to store the key) I want to point out Bitlocker and MSA are not connected and you can of course force it on without a safe place to store the key, but you do that with your eyes open. So your standard consumer who knows no better sets up an MSA, gets bitlocker and a recovery key stored off box, with a route to reset their password. All of this notwithstanding the fact, if your data is important, you back it up, no ifs, no buts, no-ones responsibility other than your own. Important data lives in at least two locations, one of which is offline and recovery is tested, otherwise that data wasn't really that important. Disks, fail, laptops get lost, phones end up down the toilet, tablets get stolen, if your only copy of data is on a single device you're doing it wrong.
    • Clearly that feature isn't for us. It's for the ad spam marketers so they can more directly target us about going to places we might want to go again...but without understanding context clues. Like for the flight someone took for a friend's funeral. We want to be reminded of that every time we open an app, a browser, or email, right? Right, Siri?
    • Is your Apple Watch supported? Check the watchOS 27 compatibility list by Aditya Tiwari Apple kicked off WWDC 2026 with a ton of announcements, mostly centered around Apple Intelligence improvements, the Siri AI, and Liquid Glass updates. However, there is a lot of other stuff that couldn't catch the limelight. Let's talk about watchOS 27 and which models are supported by the newest operating system. According to the Cupertino giant, watchOS 27 will be supported on the following Apple Watch models when it arrives later this year: Apple Watch Ultra 3 Apple Watch Series 11 Apple Watch SE 3 Apple Watch Series 10 Apple Watch Ultra 2 It's a stark contrast with last year's watchOS 26 update, which had almost a dozen Apple Watch models in its list of supported devices. Apple supported models all the way back to Apple Watch Series 6. That said, if you own one of the five models, you'll need an iPhone 11 (or later) with iOS 27 to install the latest update. Yes, Apple has shown some extra love to the iPhone 11, and it old horse supports the iOS 27 update. watchOS 27 beta 1 is now available for developers and interested power users through the Apple Developer Program. So, if you're among those who like to play with fire, you can download it to your supported Apple Watch. Otherwise, the public beta for watchOS 27 will be available next month. The freshly baked Apple Watch update comes with Siri AI - an advanced, fully conversational version of Siri powered by Apple Intelligence due for later this year. A new dynamic app grid features icons for five Siri-suggested apps. You can use a new tap gesture to open a widget in the Smart Stack, and a new Find My app finally clears the mess of Find Devices, Find Items, and Find People on Apple Watch. Workout Buddy can run without an iPhone nearby and offers new insights based on data, including your progress for pace, distance, and workout duration. Apple improved its motion tracking algorithms to measure the distance of indoor treadmill runs and walks more precisely. Speaking of other changes, the music playback on watchOS 27 starts faster and you can create custom passes for any membership or card that uses a QR code or barcode, then easily access them in the Wallet app or pin in the Smart Stack.
    • "and pull old flight details from your email during back-and-forth conversations" The Siri I've become to know and trust. I've always wanted to pull info on old flights. /s
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      85
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!