• 0

Definitive Best Antivirus 2007


Definitive Best Antivirus  

1407 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • [url=http://www.avira.com/]Antivir[/url]
      43
    • [url=http://www.avast.com/]Avast![/url]
      118
    • [url=http://www.grisoft.com/]AVG[/url]
      159
    • [url=http://www.bitdefender.com/]BitDefender[/url]
      21
    • [url=http://www.clamwin.com/]ClamWin[/url]
      5
    • [url=http://www.f-secure.com/]F-Secure[/url]
      13
    • [url=http://www.kaspersky.com/]Kaspersky[/url]
      258
    • [url=http://www.mcafee.com/]McAfee[/url]
      35
    • [url=http://www.eset.com/]NOD32[/url]
      581
    • N/A
      174
  2. 2. Your Choice?

    • [url=http://www.symantec.com/]Norton[/url]
      85
    • [url=http://www.pandasoftware.com/]Panda[/url]
      21
    • [url=http://www.sophos.com/]Sophos[/url]
      17
    • [url=http://www.symantec.com/]Symantec (Corporate)[/url]
      114
    • [url=http://www.trendmicro.com/]Trend[/url]
      38
    • [url=http://www.anti-virus.by/en/]VBA32[/url]
      7
    • [url=http://www.windowsonecare.com/]Windows Onecare[/url]
      83
    • [url=http://www.zonelabs.com/store/content/catalog/products/sku_list_zaav.jsp?dc=1]Zone[/url]
      49
    • Other (Please specify below)
      71
    • N/A
      922


Question

A fresh "Best Antivirus" poll for 2007. Please use this as a reference when researching antivirus utilities. As time goes on, the poll can be updated to add further options.

Due to limitations of IPB - this will be seen as 2 polls. Select the Antivirus program you wish to vote for, and choose N/A in the other poll.

Happy voting!

Poll choices are links to the software pages.

Edited by Joel
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/526708-definitive-best-antivirus-2007/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

For People who says that A is better, B is better, please let us know as well, why you think it's better, so you can help other people :)

I'll go with Avast, just because it's free and catch all of viruses so far in my computer/email

  • 0

I think in terms in detection rate, Kaspersky is the best, but I prefer NOD32, even though it has a somewhat lower detection rate. I've used version 5 of KAV for a few months, and then the version 6 trial, but I found that it tends to cause some lag sometimes, especially in a directory full of many or large files.

NOD32 just happily runs in the background and I never notice it, until I get a popup about a completed update.

I still voted for Kaspersky though :p

  • 0

Crap name, great software. Trend Micro "PC-Cillin" Internet Security 2007. I've used Trend in various different guises since 1997 and it just gets better and better.

NO problems at all. Plus as I'm a beta tester (have been for the last 5 years) I get it for nowt. But I'd pay for it, too.

Free Anti Virus has got to be Avast!, hands down. Solid as a rock, reliable. And Free :)

  • 0

Many great posts from the previous thread should be included in this one because they were unbiased and very informative. Ghost96 made the best replies I had seen in ages.

http://av-comparatives.org

Best payware:

- Kaspersky (detection rate, update frequency)

- NOD32 (stability, memory usage)

Best freeware:

- AntiVir (detection rate)

- Avast

Regardless, nothing beats the human brain. If you have good knowledge on how to maintain a secure system and use computer sense, your need for an anti-virus software will vary. I'm currently using NOD32 and don't usually have it running unless I intend on scanning something I download, which is the only reason I use it. If I were to become massively infected (which never happens because I'm not naive or stupid) I wouldn't try to disinfect my system, I would just use my Acronis Rescue Media Boot CD to restore my system with an image file saved on my second HDD. Anything personal I keep in password-protection 7-Zip archives until I burn it to CD/DVD for safe-keeping (so my personal info/files are never compromised). I'm behind a DI-604 Router which I feel is pretty locked down. I use Opera with Java and scripting disabled. I use POP3 for e-mail through the Opera Mail Client. My G-Mail is imported into it from the actual site, then deleted from the site and saved onto my HDD where I can easily and quickly delete anything I don't want (I don't get spam/junk mail anyway). I have an nLited Windows XP Corporate SP2 installation where common exploitable components and EXEs are removed (which don't break any core OS functionality or anything I use). I use mostly open-source and freeware software and try to keep the number of programs installed as minimal as I can, which isn't directly related to staying secure, but it helps. And as I said, computer sense is crucial.

You could also use a second machine (old or new) and put Linux on it and have your network traffic filtered through that I imagine. I've personally never done it myself.

As long as you follow those general guidelines, you shouldn't ever have anything to worry about.

It's unfortunate that there are hundreds of millions of users out there who don't take such precautions, are naive, think they are invincible, don't understand how things work in the computer world, don't care, take things for granted, etc... and they complain that their OS or PC sucks or is slow, strange 1 minute calls to dozens of wherever-places show on their phone bill, a charge for a $5000 auction item on eBay shows on their VISA, everyone on their MSN contacts list received a message stating they want to have sexual relations with them and then are blocked and deleted, but not before all of them received a trojan horse download, and finally their system becomes unbootable. Yeah, it's really unfortunate...

Well, that's my two cents.

  • 0

NOD32 is the best of all the antivirus I've used. Kaspersky was not bad but is so much slower, not only with scanning but when you move several files around it takes a lot longer with Kaspersky running the background scan than it does with NOD32. I found NOD32 to be less hassle, I could leave it to do its thing.

  • 0

I have used Trend for years and it has never let me down in any of the areas that it covers. I have never been without protection, and it catches absolutely everything, both virus and malware that I have gotten. Plus the easy beta testing they provide really helps for?suggesting?options?and?relating?problems?directly?to?the?developers.

For free A/V though, I'd have to go with AVG free. Not quite as good IMHO, but still great considering it is free?:)d?small :)

  • 0

NOD32 is a great AV software. I switched from Symantec Norton to NOD32 and I am very happy. Symantec and Kaspersky both use up alot of resource and both are expensive software compare to the NOD32. For both Kaspersky and Symantec one year is about $70. But with Nod32 two years is $40. The new verison of NOD32 (Version 3.0) will come with a firewall coming this Feburary.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? You didn't really think this through did you? lol. The engine has all the tools a dev needs to optimize their game, Epic isn't gonna hold their hand to make sure they use them. Also, Epic isn't forcing anyone to use Lumen, Nanite or super high resolution meshes and textures. Most of the stuttering can easily be fixed by generating a PSO cache and compiling every shader before loading the game, it's up to the developer to set it up properly.
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!