• 0

Definitive Best Antivirus 2007


Definitive Best Antivirus  

1407 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • [url=http://www.avira.com/]Antivir[/url]
      43
    • [url=http://www.avast.com/]Avast![/url]
      118
    • [url=http://www.grisoft.com/]AVG[/url]
      159
    • [url=http://www.bitdefender.com/]BitDefender[/url]
      21
    • [url=http://www.clamwin.com/]ClamWin[/url]
      5
    • [url=http://www.f-secure.com/]F-Secure[/url]
      13
    • [url=http://www.kaspersky.com/]Kaspersky[/url]
      258
    • [url=http://www.mcafee.com/]McAfee[/url]
      35
    • [url=http://www.eset.com/]NOD32[/url]
      581
    • N/A
      174
  2. 2. Your Choice?

    • [url=http://www.symantec.com/]Norton[/url]
      85
    • [url=http://www.pandasoftware.com/]Panda[/url]
      21
    • [url=http://www.sophos.com/]Sophos[/url]
      17
    • [url=http://www.symantec.com/]Symantec (Corporate)[/url]
      114
    • [url=http://www.trendmicro.com/]Trend[/url]
      38
    • [url=http://www.anti-virus.by/en/]VBA32[/url]
      7
    • [url=http://www.windowsonecare.com/]Windows Onecare[/url]
      83
    • [url=http://www.zonelabs.com/store/content/catalog/products/sku_list_zaav.jsp?dc=1]Zone[/url]
      49
    • Other (Please specify below)
      71
    • N/A
      922


Question

A fresh "Best Antivirus" poll for 2007. Please use this as a reference when researching antivirus utilities. As time goes on, the poll can be updated to add further options.

Due to limitations of IPB - this will be seen as 2 polls. Select the Antivirus program you wish to vote for, and choose N/A in the other poll.

Happy voting!

Poll choices are links to the software pages.

Edited by Joel
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/526708-definitive-best-antivirus-2007/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
It's your computer and your systems safety however,

Norton is more like a virus than an Anti-virus.

It takes over your system, hogs your resources and unfortunately,

doesn't' rank very high in the protection scheme.

It is also very widely used and is one of the reasons why we have so many infected computers. IMHO

Well thats your opinion, an antivirus app is only as good as it's definition file.

Some engines do scan without latest defs, but know if something is suspicious.

  • 0
My Norton Anti Virus Subscription expired should I stay with them and re-sub scrip or go with nod32 can I have reasons please thank you.

If you read these topics, and go to www.av-comparatives.org you'll find all the proof you need. Use the SymNRT tool and install Avast or AntiVir. try them out, see how you like them.

  • 0
I'm afraid you're suffering from denial and have also been living under a rock for a very long time now. Norton is the absolute worst anti-virus. I've tried 20 products and Norton is in its own league of crapiness.

Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition and Norton Antivirus are two seperate things.

I have seen the "user" or "home" versions that Symantec installs preloaded on new machines. Yeah, it sucks big time.

However I see no problem with SAV Corp 10.1. Plus, try managing 1200 workstations with antivirus software with anything else But Symantec System Center. ;)

  • 0
Has anyone else tried the Aol branded Kaspersky?

Yes, I have. It's exactly what you'd think it is. It's Kaspersky with AOL's name on it. The GUI is the same otherwise and so is the functionality and processes; "avp.exe", two instances as usual.

- The installer includes a "Security Toolbar" which I passed on.

- It also does not give you a custom install option so the File and Mail Protection components are installed regardless.

- The icon looks like the turnable knob you'd find on a washer or dryer.

- When you install it, it will ask to reboot, do a 5MB update and then reboot again.

- The activation code is good for 1 year, upon expiration the program will immediately become completely unusable.

- Kaspersky's trial period is for 1 month.

Conclusion: For the exact same thing for 11 additional months of it not pestering you to purchase it or whatever, use AOL's branded version.

Oh, and incase you want the installer and activation key without having to submit your e-mail address to AOL:

RapidShare Download Link

Activation Code: GUYP2-KJZWV-6X8ZW-ZBFQ7

  • 0

+1 vote for Avast! (Home Edition)

been using it since i switched from AVG.... definitely caught more, and been a great Freeware Anti-Virus.. I also got 4 other comps using it, and anytime any of them get a virus warning, i get a Messenger Popup (through messenger service) on my comp with details... :)

  • 0

I'm using Norton Antivirus and have done for a long time, although I think that there probably is a better one out there. It's pretty good with Viruses and my computer doesn't crash or anything but it has made Networking quite a tricky business.

  • 0

I was using NOD32 trial version. After it timed out, i looked at the tests of the av-comparatives, and decided to try Antivir. (as it had really good results in the tests) And i gotta tell you, while i was using NOD32, i noticed no virus warnings at all, even with very high detection settings, but after a while i installed Antivir, it started to give virus warnings time to time (usually worms). So i think we should reconsider our choices.

  • 0
I have now switched to NOD32!

and highly recommend it! (Y)

Same here. I switched from ZoneAlarm Security Suite as it was giving me problems. Now I just run Nod 32 with a NAT router and everything works flawlessly. Nod 32 is definitely a great virus scanner and very light on resources. It can be scanning and you will barely notice it at all. Great software.

  • 0

I'm currently using AVG Free, downloaded the EICAR test file and it... PASSED THROUGH!?! I'm considering switching away, I want something light weight that doesn't hack around Windows (ahem, Norton) and has a decent detection rate. From what Im seeing in the thread its a toss up between Kaspersky and NOD32. Recommendations?

  • 0

The anti-virus with the highest detection rate of all is G-DATA AntiVirusKit 2007, but it's not free and won't even let you update the definitions without having a valid registration key for it. It uses Kaspersky's and Avast's engines. 2006's version used Kaspersky and BitDefender, but BD was replaced by Avast so that AVK would consume less resources.

In regards to detection rate between Kaspersky and NOD32, Kapersky detects more, but isn't as good on the proactive side as NOD32. NOD32 is rock-solid stable, consumes minimal resources and scans very quickly and thoroughly.

If you go with Kaspersky, do a custom install and deselect everything but the on-demand scanner itself. Kaspersky has cleaned out malware from dozens of systems I've used it on. It's pretty much the only product I personally trust.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • They already threw the Ultra 1st gen under the bus?
    • Right, Google... because that's who this is going to. Google, the company who's entire business model is geared around ad revenue and your personal data.
    • That is the natural course for regulations. First to protect the consumer. Then to protect the business/industry from upstart competition. There are countless examples across history.
    • I have never been a huge fan of libre, it feels really good but exactly when you need an advance feature for data wrangling it falls short every time or has bugs. I am all for euro office if they can deliver a good and usable alternative to MS office with backing of govt function.
    • Go on, I'll bite. How does windows (nice comment on an 'article' which doesn't actually involve it ) lock users out of their data then? Been using it since 3.1 back in 92 and not once have I been locked out of my data? Perhaps you mean Bitlocker? In which case the average user (who doesn't mess about) will have been forced to use a MSA, and in which case the recovery key would have been saved to said account..... If the user did happen to bodge around and not use an MSA then Bitlocker wouldn't have become live (as it cannot without a safe place to store the key) I want to point out Bitlocker and MSA are not connected and you can of course force it on without a safe place to store the key, but you do that with your eyes open. So your standard consumer who knows no better sets up an MSA, gets bitlocker and a recovery key stored off box, with a route to reset their password. All of this notwithstanding the fact, if your data is important, you back it up, no ifs, no buts, no-ones responsibility other than your own. Important data lives in at least two locations, one of which is offline and recovery is tested, otherwise that data wasn't really that important. Disks, fail, laptops get lost, phones end up down the toilet, tablets get stolen, if your only copy of data is on a single device you're doing it wrong.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      86
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!