• 0

Definitive Best Antivirus 2007


Definitive Best Antivirus  

1407 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • [url=http://www.avira.com/]Antivir[/url]
      43
    • [url=http://www.avast.com/]Avast![/url]
      118
    • [url=http://www.grisoft.com/]AVG[/url]
      159
    • [url=http://www.bitdefender.com/]BitDefender[/url]
      21
    • [url=http://www.clamwin.com/]ClamWin[/url]
      5
    • [url=http://www.f-secure.com/]F-Secure[/url]
      13
    • [url=http://www.kaspersky.com/]Kaspersky[/url]
      258
    • [url=http://www.mcafee.com/]McAfee[/url]
      35
    • [url=http://www.eset.com/]NOD32[/url]
      581
    • N/A
      174
  2. 2. Your Choice?

    • [url=http://www.symantec.com/]Norton[/url]
      85
    • [url=http://www.pandasoftware.com/]Panda[/url]
      21
    • [url=http://www.sophos.com/]Sophos[/url]
      17
    • [url=http://www.symantec.com/]Symantec (Corporate)[/url]
      114
    • [url=http://www.trendmicro.com/]Trend[/url]
      38
    • [url=http://www.anti-virus.by/en/]VBA32[/url]
      7
    • [url=http://www.windowsonecare.com/]Windows Onecare[/url]
      83
    • [url=http://www.zonelabs.com/store/content/catalog/products/sku_list_zaav.jsp?dc=1]Zone[/url]
      49
    • Other (Please specify below)
      71
    • N/A
      922


Question

A fresh "Best Antivirus" poll for 2007. Please use this as a reference when researching antivirus utilities. As time goes on, the poll can be updated to add further options.

Due to limitations of IPB - this will be seen as 2 polls. Select the Antivirus program you wish to vote for, and choose N/A in the other poll.

Happy voting!

Poll choices are links to the software pages.

Edited by Joel
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/526708-definitive-best-antivirus-2007/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Here is the latest, took it from PC Magazine - May 08, 2007

122728on19042007eu7.png

AntiVirusKit 2006 has a clean interface and is easy to navigate-even for the novice. On the other hand, it has plenty of customization features for more advanced users to personalize the program to fit their needs.

The program uses both the Kaspersky and the Bitdefender scan engines which means it uses about double the system resources as the other products. The software also took about 4 hours to scan an 80 GB hard drive versus the 30 minutes the higher-ranked programs take.

The software has won several antivirus test awards, though it didn't pass the level 2 from West Coast Labs, which means it failed to disinfect viruses after finding them.

Source: http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenre...kit-review.html

  • 0
No, you mean

Kaspersky

and THEN NOD32.

I accept your apology.

It's people like you that makes the internet suck, on the other hand it's balanced by people like Bryan84 who actually provide USEFUL posts.

I've stopped using AV programs since I installed Vista. Whenever I want to do a scan i use F-secure's online scanner.

  • 0
I used Norton 2003 and 2004 when they came out. They were resource hogs, and couldn't even get rid of the threats/viruses that it managed to detect.

Since then, I joined Neowin, got smarter and started using Avast because it was free.

Switched to Kaspersky, somehow I didn't really like the interface.

Now I'm using NOD32 and there is NO looking back :p

NOD32 (Y)

LOL so true... +1.!

  • 0

Kaspersky. I was a Norton monkey like most everyone else until a few years ago when I caught a clue. Read the reviews, went with Nod32 but didn't like interface, then went with Kaspersky. I'm completely happy.

FYI here is top10reivews take on the top 20:

Gold: BitDefender

Silver: Kaspersky

Bronze: F-Secure Anti-Virus

#4 PC-cillin

#5 ESET Nod32

#6 McAfee VirusScan

#7 Norton AntiVirus

#8 AVG AntiVirus

#9 CA Antivirus

#10 Norman Virus Control

#11 AntiVirusKit

#12 AVAST!

#13 Panda Titanium

#14 F-Prot

#15 PCTools AntiVirus

#16 ViRobot Expert

#17 WinAntiVirus

NA CyberScrub AntiVirus

NA The Shield AntiVirus

NA Windows OneCare

Source: http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/

Edited by nbtc971
  • 0
It's people like you that makes the internet suck, on the other hand it's balanced by people like Bryan84 who actually provide USEFUL posts.

I've stopped using AV programs since I installed Vista. Whenever I want to do a scan i use F-secure's online scanner.

Haha. I'm humbled. :) I personally feel it's up to personal preference of users to decide which they feel best. Only the results can show stats but only if you try then you will know. :)

they are all useless

when crrap happens, half of them dont detect anything!

Ermmm, not true. No virus got pass my Kaspersky till date.

  • 0
Can some give my a reasons why NOD32 is better than Kaspersky. And vice versa.

NOD32 is much faster and lighter than Kaspersky. It also has the best heuristics engine (so you'll be able to detect many new/unknown malware without updates). NOD32 also has a lower false positive rate than Kaspersky.

Kaspersky detects more malware than NOD32 does - it has the largest virus database and is more frequently updated than NOD32. It's also very good at cleaning infected files, while NOD32 doesn't clean infected files.

  • 0

Kaspersky issues very frequent updates. So if you have an internet connection it more than makes up for its weak heuristics. Nod32 on the otherhand lags behind in detection rate especially with trojans.

Btw, heuristics can lead to false positives. I read that NOD32 was detecting speedbit video accelerator as a malware, possibly because of the large number of connections it establishes on being started.

  • 0

i recently had the most updated version of Kaspersky...and looking at the definition ratings...its beats all the others...its 1st and 2nd!

i kinda wanted to try NOD32....mainly because it built on the same engine and its less cpu intensive

i need help...which shud i put back in position?? my KASPERSKy....or.....NOD32 ?/

i really like both

  • 0
i recently had the most updated version of Kaspersky...and looking at the definition ratings...its beats all the others...its 1st and 2nd!

i kinda wanted to try NOD32....mainly because it built on the same engine and its less cpu intensive

i need help...which shud i put back in position?? my KASPERSKy....or.....NOD32 ?/

i really like both

If resource usage is not an issue, then I would recommend Kaspersky. If you find yourself disabling your antivirus often for eg, to play games, etc (ie, it's affecting your system performance) then go for NOD32.

  • 0
avg free 7.5 because its free and it doesnt have the retarded layout of nod

It's not a retarded layout, it simply does not appeal to you, but it does to me. However, it is one of the best anti-virus products so the user interface should not be the top priority.

  • 0

NOD32 is much faster and lighter than Kaspersky. It also has the best heuristics engine (so you'll be able to detect many new/unknown malware without updates). NOD32 also has a lower false positive rate than Kaspersky.

Kaspersky detects more malware than NOD32 does - it has the largest virus database and is more frequently updated than NOD32. It's also very good at cleaning infected files, while NOD32 doesn't clean infected files.

Very well said!

*thumbs up*

  • 0

I'm using Kaspersky and also liked NOD32/ESET just fine.

I'm just here to say the TrendMicro is not a good choice from my experience with my own computer and other computers...lets stuff in and then can't get rid of it. :angry:

Kaspersky nuked the offending file immediately.

  • 0

Symantec Antivirus Corporate 10.2 is without a doubt, the best antivirus i've used in my entire life.

I swear it's like it's not even running. More efficient than Norton, AVG, Kaspersky, and NOD32.

  • 0

In all this diskussions I missed two excellent antivirus solution. When I evaluated for a new antivirus I found two that where quite unknown: Rising antivirus from china and Quick Heal from india. Especially rising found malware not detected by nod32 or kaspersky. Try it.

Generally I think, that main question is not if solution finds all known viruses but if it finds unkown viruses. Thats the point where all solutions are different. See the different test on www.virusbulletin.com.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My issue is I can't access the forum on mobile if the site is set to Desktop mode on Vivaldi because it can't complete the Cloud flare am I a bot check! I know this is a Vivaldi issues as it has started happening on all cloud flare check sites, it's so annoying, I've reported it but no fix yet.
    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!