• 0

Definitive Best Antivirus 2007


Definitive Best Antivirus  

1407 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • [url=http://www.avira.com/]Antivir[/url]
      43
    • [url=http://www.avast.com/]Avast![/url]
      118
    • [url=http://www.grisoft.com/]AVG[/url]
      159
    • [url=http://www.bitdefender.com/]BitDefender[/url]
      21
    • [url=http://www.clamwin.com/]ClamWin[/url]
      5
    • [url=http://www.f-secure.com/]F-Secure[/url]
      13
    • [url=http://www.kaspersky.com/]Kaspersky[/url]
      258
    • [url=http://www.mcafee.com/]McAfee[/url]
      35
    • [url=http://www.eset.com/]NOD32[/url]
      581
    • N/A
      174
  2. 2. Your Choice?

    • [url=http://www.symantec.com/]Norton[/url]
      85
    • [url=http://www.pandasoftware.com/]Panda[/url]
      21
    • [url=http://www.sophos.com/]Sophos[/url]
      17
    • [url=http://www.symantec.com/]Symantec (Corporate)[/url]
      114
    • [url=http://www.trendmicro.com/]Trend[/url]
      38
    • [url=http://www.anti-virus.by/en/]VBA32[/url]
      7
    • [url=http://www.windowsonecare.com/]Windows Onecare[/url]
      83
    • [url=http://www.zonelabs.com/store/content/catalog/products/sku_list_zaav.jsp?dc=1]Zone[/url]
      49
    • Other (Please specify below)
      71
    • N/A
      922


Question

A fresh "Best Antivirus" poll for 2007. Please use this as a reference when researching antivirus utilities. As time goes on, the poll can be updated to add further options.

Due to limitations of IPB - this will be seen as 2 polls. Select the Antivirus program you wish to vote for, and choose N/A in the other poll.

Happy voting!

Poll choices are links to the software pages.

Edited by Joel
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/526708-definitive-best-antivirus-2007/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
is it possible to turn off that annoying voice that says "virus database has been updated !" ?

i'm using avast 4 free version.

i wanted to try "AOL Active Virus Shield" ? is it good ?

It uses Kaspersky engine, which has a much better detection rate. You can also try Avira Antivir. It has a free version available and is a top notch product.

PC World India recently did an AV Shootout (carried out by Av-test.org). Kaspersky was the winner with Norton and Bitdefender being close 2nd and 3rd respectively. Nod32 once again performed rather poorly. Its only advantage is it's heuristics (it was the best performer in proactive defense tests). But that doesnt really matter as kaspersky has a response time of less than 2 hours.

  • 0
ive been using kaspersky for a while but it was slowing down my system

i switched to NOD but its very good but the interface is ugly

so now im trying panda

Panda? OMG...You think Kaspersky slowed down your PC? Wait until you install Panda...It's worst.

Good luck brother.

  • 0

I tried AOL (Kaspersky) and it wouldn't allow me to access the web!

Maybe it was a conflict with ASHAMPOO Firewall I don't know but I went back to Norton AV/Ashampoo FW with no problems.

  • 0

A friend of mine told me that in those anti-virus showdowns in magazines and on the internet when ever they put Avira AntiVir in the mix it pretty much kills all the other contenders. Can anybody elaborate on that. I'm currently using NOD32.

  • 0
A friend of mine told me that in those anti-virus showdowns in magazines and on the internet when ever they put Avira AntiVir in the mix it pretty much kills all the other contenders. Can anybody elaborate on that. I'm currently using NOD32.

Well I can't comment on Kaspersky 7.0 since I haven't tried it out, but I have used 6.x and NOD32 more than enough times to tell you that Avira AntiVir is quite impressive. Scans hella fast, the detect rate is probably the best (depending on the test sites you visit of course) and it doesn't use much in the way of resources on my machine.

I still prefer NOD32, simply because I've used it for years and I will probably always keep it. But Avira AntiVir is a VERY good AV app, its solid.

  • 0
Well I can't comment on Kaspersky 7.0 since I haven't tried it out, but I have used 6.x and NOD32 more than enough times to tell you that Avira AntiVir is quite impressive. Scans hella fast, the detect rate is probably the best (depending on the test sites you visit of course) and it doesn't use much in the way of resources on my machine.

I still prefer NOD32, simply because I've used it for years and I will probably always keep it. But Avira AntiVir is a VERY good AV app, its solid.

While 10.2 is definitely a nice AV, antivir has a higher detection rate and uses less resources last time I checked.
Thanks for commenting on my question guys, I'll give it a try. :)
  • 0

there will be a nod32 version 3 as well as the security suite,as for beta 2 i dont know i tried an earlier one and it worked great.i keep nod32 on as it does no bug me unless something comes around and it is very light.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do; get an innate understanding of the night sky or a "quicker" path to astrophotography end results. I put "quicker" in quotes because with my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions, half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, spending a few hours shooting, merging photo sessions, etc. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!