• 0

Definitive Best Backup Software 2007


Definitive Best Backup software  

310 members have voted

  1. 1. For Home?

    • Acronis True Image
      172
    • EMC Retrospect
      2
    • Nero BackItUp
      6
    • Norton Ghost
      43
    • Norton Save & Restore
      2
    • Windows Backup
      27
    • Other (Please specify below)
      19
    • N/A
      39
  2. 2. For Work?

    • Acronis True Image
      119
    • EMC Retrospect
      5
    • Symantec/Veritas
      36
    • Windows Backup
      18
    • Other (Please specify below)
      20
    • N/A
      112


Question

A fresh "Best Backup Software" poll for 2007. Please use this as a reference when researching backup utilities. As time goes on, the poll can be updated to add further options.

Please choose one app or N/A per category when voting.

Happy voting!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/526712-definitive-best-backup-software-2007/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Acronis True Image 10 , its the best backup and restore software i have used till date.

I like its bootable cd also which allows me to restore the image without even booting into windows.

Never had any problems with backup and restoring via it.

Also like its compression rate and image restore time.

I have also used Norton Ghost 2K2 and 2K3 thats my second choice.

  • 0

I've actually had wonderful luck with Areca Backup for at home and work. It's free too!

I have it set up on my parents' computer. I have it scheduled to run a batch backup every two weeks and then it E-mails me with the results, so I know if everything went okay or if there was a problem. Very handy. Also, there is an update/improvement to the software pretty much every time I check which is always nice.

  • 0

Just saw this thread and I registered just to post. For imaging, Acronis TI is great. However, the best definitive backup program I would have to say is rsync. Not user friendly but definitely the best.

I backup 250GB of data every night over the internet with DSL on one end and Cable on the other (including several databases with over 3GB of data). It typically takes under an hour! Additionally, I have 5 separate instances of the data and am only using about 350GB of storage. This is because rsync only transferrs the changed data and also supports hard linking files. So if we only change and/or add 100MB of data, that's all it transferrs, even if some or all of that was added to a multi GB database. Hard linking is cool because the exact same files are only physically stored on the backup server once and they appear in each and every one of the backup folders. Not until you delete the last instance of the file does it remove the physical data. And with the patched rsync that supports vss, backups are heaven.

Rsync to an offsite server all the way. :cool:

  • 0

Hi people,

I'm new to doing backups and I would like a backup app that backs up from a client to a file server across a LAN, the thing is are there any that can run tasks while in non-administrator mode? I dont need file compression.

SyncBackSE seems to be a nice app, but I'm not sure if it does non-admin backups.

Any helpful suggestions or experiences?

Thanks in advance

  • 0
I've never use any backup software before. But now I'm interested.

I need one that would automatically backup my internal HD to my external automatically once a week or I could do it manually. Would any backup software do?

I have never used anything other than Ghost and True Image and I find True Image to be much better than Ghost in everything. I really love that software.

  • 0

What I'm really looking for is something that would update my internal to the external. Say I add, tweak, or delete files on my internal. So once a week, it should update the minor change to the external. Maxtor OneTouch did that job. I just never tried it. So I don't think Ghost or True Image accomplish that task. Or does it?

  • 0
I use NovaStor NovaNET at work, kinda does the trick. Although it gives some bizarre errors sometimes.

Is there a better backup software out there which is similar?

You can take a look at True Image workstation. It can also backup trough network and executes scheduled backups. From my personal experience I can claim that it is rather stable and easy in use. Furthermore it is cheaper than Novanet.

  • 0
Acronis True Image is awesome, but I really do like the new Windows Backup app in Windows Vista. If you need something that doesn't have a lot of features, but is still pretty powerful, and you don't want to spend a lot of money, I'd recommend Windows Backup if you have Windows Vista.

Otoh, I would not recommend Vista's built in backup. The following reasons uphold my statement:

1) If you do a full backup, then reinstall Vista, you cannot restore your files without doing another backup. If you don't do another backup, the program says "You have not yet backed up this computer" and then exits. Kinda pointless.

2) A full backup isn't exactly full. I only found this out after the event, but after restoring my D: drive after what I thought was a full backup, ALL my program files (e.g. .EXE files) were missing. It turns out Vista doesn't back up program files. So I've had to reinstall all my games (WoW, FSX, MSTS) and hunt down the disks for older games like Q3Arena.

YMMV.

Now I could have prevented a lot of heartache by spending more time reading how to use it, but I don't expect backup software to behave like this. Ever. Coming just weeks after my NAS drive failed without a backup, I was more than a little put out.

I am now going to try out Acronis True Image, people seem to like it :)

  • 0

General Hardware-Oriented System Transfer ( GHOST ) :laugh: ...of course... with the powerful scripts You can do almost Anything...No issues, even with SATA disks...You only need less than 2mb space for the DOS .exe.

Even it has powerful diagnostics of the file system and hard-drive. NO major issues in a lot of diferent hardware.

The Definitive backup and cloning tool...!. Yes Sir...! :whistle:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!