• 0

Definitive Best Firewall 2007

Asked by kinetix63,

 Share

Definitive Best Firewall  

715 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • BitDefender
      23
    • BlackIce
      11
    • Comodo Firewall
      131
    • F-Secure Net Security
      6
    • Hardware Firewall/NAT Router
      139
    • Jetico
      7
    • Lavasoft
      12
    • Linux based Firewall Distro
      22
    • Look 'n' Stop
      14
    • N/A
      350

  2. 2. Your Choice?

    • McAfee
      27
    • Microsoft ISA
      9
    • Netveda Safety.NET
      4
    • Norton
      24
    • Omniquad
      1
    • Outpost
      90
    • Sunbelt Kerio Personal Firewall
      51
    • Tiny
      11
    • Windows Built In Firewall
      138
    • N/A
      360

  3. 3. Your Choice?

    • Windows OneCare
      39
    • ZoneAlarm
      216
    • Other (Please specify below)
      62
    • N/A
      398

Question

Grand Master

kinetix63 Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

A fresh "Best Firewall" poll for 2007. Please use this as a reference when researching Firewall utilities. As time goes on, the poll can be updated to add further options.

Due to limitations of IPB - this will be seen as 3 polls. Select the Firewall program you wish to vote for, and choose N/A in the other polls.

Happy voting!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/526714-definitive-best-firewall-2007/
Share on other sites

185 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Grand Master

raskren

Posted
Posted
A fresh "Best Firewall" poll for 2007. Please use this as a reference when researching Firewall utilities. As time goes on, the poll can be updated to add further options.

Due to limitations of IPB - this will be seen as 3 polls. Select the Firewall program you wish to vote for, and choose N/A in the other polls.

Happy voting!

Where is OneCare?

  • 0
Experienced

+Cryton Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted (edited)

Welp where is Sygate Personal Firewall? I used to use that firewall, but then I changed to Comodo to see what it's like, and it wasn't "all that" so I went back to Sygate. (Comodo uses more memory and resources than sygate (although it does protect against more) and also has a ghey UI and won't STFU asking me if my apps can connect to the internet.. I'VE TOLD YOU FIREFOX CAN CONNECT TO THE DAMN INTERNET, SO FO ASKING ME EVERY TIME I START FIREFOX WITH A DIFFERENT URL WHETHER IT CAN STILL CONNECT, YES, YES IT FRICKEN CAN CONNECT TO THE INTERNET THANKS)

  • 0
Grand Master

kinetix63 Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted
I voted other as I use Sygate Personal Firewall Pro, its never let me down in the years I have used it.

I removed it from the poll because I was under the impression that it's not on sale any more after they've been bought by Symantec. If this is incorrect, please let me know and I will re-add it.

  • 0
Grand Master

+BeLGaRaTh Subscriber¹

Posted
  • Subscriber¹
Posted
I removed it from the poll because I was under the impression that it's not on sale any more after they've been bought by Symantec. If this is incorrect, please let me know and I will re-add it.

You indeed are correct, it is no longer available as Symantec bought it out and abandoned it, pity really as its far superior to what they still offer currently :(

But that's just my opinion :)

  • 0
Collaborator

hulkachopblocker

Posted
Posted
Welp where is Sygate Personal Firewall? I used to use that firewall, but then I changed to Comodo to see what it's like, and it wasn't "all that" so I went back to Sygate. (Comodo uses more memory and resources than sygate (although it does protect against more) and also has a ghey UI and won't STFU asking me if my apps can connect to the internet.. I'VE TOLD YOU FIREFOX CAN CONNECT TO THE DAMN INTERNET, SO FO ASKING ME EVERY TIME I START FIREFOX WITH A DIFFERENT URL WHETHER IT CAN STILL CONNECT, YES, YES IT FRICKEN CAN CONNECT TO THE INTERNET THANKS)

Meltdown in progress.

  • 0

Guest Jeremy of Many

Posted
Posted

If you can afford a hardware firewall, then either get a router or a second machine and run a Linux distro on it.

If you can't, then use Outpost or Comodo.

Or go with neither and rely on computer sense (safety guidelines to prevent malicious infections/instrusions in the first place).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to question listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By +Edouard · Posted

    • what other retro software do yall use

      By Som · Posted

      My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • EA Sports UFC 6 review: Brutal, satisfying, and surprisingly accessible to newcomers

      By Nick H. · Posted

      Bugger, you beat me to it!
    • EA Sports UFC 6 review: Brutal, satisfying, and surprisingly accessible to newcomers

      By +Good Bot, Bad Bot · Posted

      I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!