• 0

Definitive Best Firewall 2007


Definitive Best Firewall  

715 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • BitDefender
      23
    • BlackIce
      11
    • Comodo Firewall
      131
    • F-Secure Net Security
      6
    • Hardware Firewall/NAT Router
      139
    • Jetico
      7
    • Lavasoft
      12
    • Linux based Firewall Distro
      22
    • Look 'n' Stop
      14
    • N/A
      350
  2. 2. Your Choice?

    • McAfee
      27
    • Microsoft ISA
      9
    • Netveda Safety.NET
      4
    • Norton
      24
    • Omniquad
      1
    • Outpost
      90
    • Sunbelt Kerio Personal Firewall
      51
    • Tiny
      11
    • Windows Built In Firewall
      138
    • N/A
      360
  3. 3. Your Choice?

    • Windows OneCare
      39
    • ZoneAlarm
      216
    • Other (Please specify below)
      62
    • N/A
      398


Question

A fresh "Best Firewall" poll for 2007. Please use this as a reference when researching Firewall utilities. As time goes on, the poll can be updated to add further options.

Due to limitations of IPB - this will be seen as 3 polls. Select the Firewall program you wish to vote for, and choose N/A in the other polls.

Happy voting!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/526714-definitive-best-firewall-2007/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Outpost Pro ... Looks quite good and I see it gets good marks on testing, but some people report browser slowdown and that it's almost "too secure" ..

Anyone here experience browser slowdown issues with Outpost Pro ? Does it lag your pc as much as ZA Pro ?, Any other drawbacks to look out for ?

Ive tried Outpost Pro before COMODO 3.....and i couldnt stand the slowdowns....it was lagging ALOT, uninstalled after a few mins.

Tested some different configs, but no luck.

I have a Core 2 Duo with 1GB RAM.

Ill keep COMODO 3 with my Vista Ultimate machine, it seems the best choice for me now.

  • 0

Outpost is a joke............it blocks everything. Browsing slowed to dial up speeds. I tried Comodo 3.0 and it still needs work. Too many settings and that pending file thing is annoying. Went back to ZAAS which I have free when patch Tuesday offered it.

  • 0
I tried Comodo 3.0 and it still needs work. Too many settings and that pending file thing is annoying.

The beta version had some bugs, but it seems to me that the final version its ok.

I agree with you with the "too many settings", but this is a good thing for those who want to go deep into the firewall configs.

Most of the time you can use the default settings and add advanced rules with time.

  • 0

Ok after hearing all ther hype about Online Armor I thought I would give it a try. Wow. I am impressed. Very Small foot print. Doesnt bug you. Works with all games and unlike Comodo or ZA it wont lock up your games. The thing about is thats its free. Was the best leak tester also.

http://www.matousec.com/projects/windows-p...sts-results.php

http://www.tallemu.com/online_armor_free.html

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Windows Server gets DNS over HTTPS (DoH) support by Usama Jawad For the past few months, Microsoft has been previewing DNS over HTTPS (DoH) for Windows DNS Server, touting it as a foundational upgrade for zero-trust enterprise networks. It essentially introduces encrypted, authenticated DNS for the networks rather than transmitting DNS traffic in clear. Now, the company has introduced the general availability (GA) of this feature. The GA of DoH encourages organizations to deploy the solution in production environments without implementing a new client-to-resolver architecture. DoH helps improve the overall security of the network and reduces the risk of spoofing due to its zero-trust design. This is a significant change because pretty much every interaction with the network requires interfacing with DNS. DoH offers several advantages over standard DNS traffic, such as encryption using HTTPS, preventing unauthorized inspection, man-in-the-middle attacks, and traffic analysis. Since it leverages TLS certificates so that clients can verify the identity of the DNS server, it prevents spoofing through this authentication mechanism. Additionally, it's built on the DoH standard defined by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), which means that it should work with modern RFC 8484-compliant clients. Finally, it integrates into the existing network architecture seamlessly and can even run in parallel with standard DNS, so that customers can migrate to the new technology at their own pace. Microsoft says that in the past few months of preview, DoH has become more stable, and customers can confidently deploy it in production environments with proper guidance. Microsoft has emphasized that migrating to DoH is necessary for organizations that are moving toward zero-trust DNS solutions. Windows clients already support DoH, but the latest availability on Windows Server provides encrypted DNS to all endpoints. The company has also mentioned that "while this release focuses on encrypting client-to-resolver communication, support for encrypted communication between Windows DNS Server and upstream DNS resolvers is planned for a future update." You can follow Microsoft's guidance to deploy DoH here, but keep in mind that you need a Windows Server 2025 installation with the latest Patch Tuesday updates installed.
    • Lol I had one of these turn faulty in Jan, guess it wasn't just bad luck lol
    • I'm team Rossmann all the way. I have the exact same NVME, altough not in an array like him.
    • It had gone weeks ago. Although thinking about it I'm on the beta.
    • They thought value of their goods would forever only drop like it used to and didn't account for sudden increase in price because of all the Ai hype. Tough luck Samsung, don't try to weasel this one out. Also American customer protection laws are a**. In Europe, you need to be compensated for a functioning product of same or better characteristics (not same price point as when it was originally bought!) if it can't be repaired and when you receive a replacement product your warranty starts from scratch because you received a different item than you previously had and old warranty thus cannot apply to it anymore. If your actual item was successfully repaired, warranty gets extended for the period the item was in service. If item is repaired to a significant extent, warranty also starts over from scratch because major part of it was replaced. Americans need to fight to get this kind of consumer protections because they are constantly getting screwed over.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      184
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      159
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!